For Dr. Brian Young Mclean
When nature has work to be done,
she creates a genius to do it.
EMERSON
Prologue
IT WAS JULY 26, 1935. Tens of thousands came to the Los Angeles City Hall to pay their respects to William Mulholland. Scores of black limousines circled the streets as mourners lined the sidewalks waiting to bid farewell to the retired chief engineer of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. At exactly 10:00 A.M., City Hall’s huge bronze doors swung wide, and the waiting crowd streamed inside the building’s massive, four-story rotunda.
Elaborate funeral wreaths of chrysanthemums, gladioli, and red and white roses surrounded the body, which lay in a flag-draped, blue steel coffin. Gifts, hand-written notes, personal tributes, framed photographs, mementos, and garden bouquets had been lovingly placed beside his funeral bier; a myrtle wreath from President Franklin D. Roosevelt and a hand-penned note of condolence from former President Herbert Hoover were among the offerings.
City officials, celebrities, working men, and families silently queued toward Mulholland’s coffin. Among the mourners were publisher Harry Chandler, banker Joseph Sartori, philanthropist George L. Eastman, humorist Will Rogers, University Chancellor Ernest C. Moore, six United States senators, four state governors, scientists, millionaires, engineering associates, and men who had worked with him in the tunnels and in the field.
As mourners passed the open casket, they stopped briefly to stare at the waxen features of “The Chief,” now finally at peace in death. Some placed tokens and gifts inside his coffin or near the pyre. Others gently touched the brow of their beloved Chief, or whispered a prayer, then awkwardly moved on.
Meanwhile, throughout the city, eulogies praised William Mulholland for his honesty, modesty, valor, intellect, humanity, and, above all, his spectacular achievements for the city of Los Angeles. At 2:00 P.M., for ten minutes, two million residents of Los Angeles halted commerce to pay homage. Flags at all schools and public buildings were lowered to half-mast. Water in the Los Angeles Aqueduct was stopped for one minute as it flowed from the river in the Owens Valley. One thousand miles across the desert, ten thousand men working on the Colorado River Aqueduct paused with reverence to stand bareheaded, their steam shovels, drills, and tractors silenced in tribute.
“We are a forgetful generation,” declared Los Angeles Mayor Frank L. Shaw, “but pray God that this community will never forget the everlasting debt of gratitude it owes this human diamond. His like we may never see again.”
IT HAS BEEN SAID of heroes that for every devoted admirer won on the precarious climb to glory, two enemies are incurred. William Mulholland was no exception. Coupled with the outpouring of tribute was enough hatred, both within the city of Los Angeles and in Owens Valley, 250 miles to the north, to prove he had labored and struggled in the world. There had been many among the mourning crowd who had come not to revere but to damn; some even blamed him for the violent deaths of their kin.
They, too, had left gifts among the tribute offerings. Placed inconspicuously amid the rose petals of a huge funeral wreath draped across the foot of Mulholland’s casket was a small glass vial tied with a ragged fragment of red cotton, now faded and stained. Many would have recognized it as a commemorative from the opening of the Los Angeles Aqueduct. The tiny vial had been saved all those years by someone who had been in the crowd that day. When opened, the vial emitted the unmistakable, acrid odor of urine.
Yet even this dismaying commentary was lost amid the tributes and praise. Like Moses, William Mulholland had gone to the mountain and had brought back life–in the form of water–to a city dying of thirst. He transformed a land that could not support 250,000 souls into a flourishing oasis harboring millions.
ONCE THE PROCESSION at City Hall ended and the last bereaved were gone, the bronze doors of City Hall were closed. Now William Mulholland would be transported to his eternal place of rest, a mausoleum situated upon a sunlit rise overlooking the city for which he had accomplished and sacrificed so much.
Requiescat in pace great dreamer, great builder,
great friend of our fair and prospering city.
Acknowledgments
William Mulholland’s office files during his tenure as Chief Engineer and General Manager are part of the collections of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s Historical Records Program. The correspondence and other papers proved invaluable in chronicling the career of William Mulholland. I am especially indebted to Dr. Paul Soifer, project manager for the Historical Records Program, and consulting archivist Thomas Connors, both of the Bancroft Group, for their generous assistance.
Many people have made this book possible. I am deeply grateful to Joyce Purcell, Senior Librarian, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Craig G. St. Clair, company historian for the Los Angeles Times,Charles Johnson of the Ventura County Museum of History and Art, Kathy Barnes of the Eastern California Museum, and Thomas M. Coyle of the Los Angeles County Medical Association Library. I also thank the librarians at the University of California, Berkeley, Water Resources Center Archives, the Henry Huntington Library, the Moses H. Sherman Foundation, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Special Collections.
Special thanks to Jim Allen, Karen Chappelle,Michael Dougherty, Sandy Ferguson, Bob Feinberg, Jeffrey Forer, Louise Fraboni, Lee Harris, Burt Kennedy, Shelly Lowenkopf, Keith Lehrer, Steve Paymer, Roger S. Roney, Robin Shapiro, Rick Solomon, Richard Somers, Jean Stine, Paul Ward, David Williams, and Digby Wolfe.
Enough appreciation cannot be expressed to Catherine Davis and James H. Davis, Noel Riley Fitch, Dr. James Ragan, Susan Vaughn, and the late Tommy Thompson.
My heartfelt thanks are due my editor, Scott Waxman, and literary agent, Richard Curtis. Finally, I am especially indebted to Larry Ashmead at HarperCollins, who graciously gave his support to this biography.
MARGARET LESLIE DAVIS
Brentwood, CaliforniaFebruary 1993
1
Genesis
The good works of some are
manifest beforehand.
1 TIM 5:25
WILLIAM MULHOLLAND and Fred Eaton set out for the Owens Valley from Los Angeles on September 4, 1904, in a two-horse buckboard. Their trek to Inyo County would take five grueling days, and the two friends decided to camp out along the way, living on a miner’s diet of bacon, beans, and hard liquor. They later joked that their route could be easily traced by following the trail of empty whiskey bottles—dead soldiers—left in their wake.
The first twenty-five miles out of Los Angeles were uneventful. Eaton managed to negotiate the buckboard through the familiar dry washes of the Big and Little Tujunga Rivers without difficulty. The going got rough when they reached the notorious Newhall Grade where the narrow, unpaved road climbed forty-two degrees. The adventurers, one the chief of the Los Angeles Water Department and the other a former mayor, had to unload three weeks supply of food, water, horse feed, and bedding and push the buckboard behind the horses to get to the top, then trudge back down the grade to retrieve the supplies.
At the town of Newhall, in the Santa Clara Valley, Mulholland and Eaton spent the evening drinking at the local saloon. The next morning they traveled northwest to Saugus and east into the Soledad Canyon, where for thirty-five miles they struggled through a narrow and difficult mountain pass, and unexpectedly struck water. Their wagon sunk miserably into the soggy earth. The two civic dignitaries removed their boots and waded in, pushing, shoving, and cursing at the wagon and horses for two hours until the vehicle’s wheels finally lifted to solid ground. After passing through the town of Acton—stopping at a small brick hotel where they liberally refreshed themselves at the bar—they journeyed fifteen more miles to the tiny, weather-beaten desert town of Palmdale, population twenty-five.
There, Mulholland guided the wagon across the summit of the Tehachapi mountains, altitude 3,800 feet, where he could see for a distance of 150 pollution-free miles the desert terrain that lay further ahead, a staggering vista of mountain peaks and dry lakes.
Entering the Mojave Desert after traveling through the junctions of Del Sur, Elizabeth Lake, Fairmont, and Willow Springs, Mulholland and his friend reached the sunbaked town of Mojave. After a night’s drinking and rest in a deep featherbed at a Mojave hotel, the men departed shortly after sunrise. They had traveled a distance of ninety miles in two days.
Pushing forward across the baked desert floor, Mulholland heard the wheels of the buckboard crunch over miles of hard gravel and dry rocky washes. He saw the rock and boxwood headstones of men who had died in the desert, alongside the bleached skeletons of stage horses, their harnesses scattered along the isolated trails.
Some distance further, the desert melded into a gorgeous shade-mirage of turquoise and deep maroon, softening the hellish atmosphere of heat. When the wind blew, dust devils bounced wildly among the sage and greasewood; Joshua trees rose in the midst of nothing and stretched forth their twisted arms, as though warning travelers that the land’s legacy was death.
The next day, Mulholland and Eaton reached a beautiful sandstone canyon called Red Rock, and came to the only sign of habitation within twenty miles—a shack of unpainted boards owned by an old Irish oxcart builder. The enterprising old desert rat had dug a water well and mounted a hand pump on it, and in front of the shack waiting for the travelers he had filled pails with water. A sign in lead pencil cautioned: WATER 10 CENTS A PAIL.
Drinking his fill, Mulholland joked, “Fred, there’s no use traveling further—we’ve found the water for Los Angeles.”
“The only problem,” Eaton laughed, “is it’s just too damn expensive.”
Next, the two men reached the summit of the canyon, at last climbing to an altitude of 4,400 feet above sea level. As they progressed, the desert’s floor rose higher and higher, in step with the peaks of the snow-capped Sierra Nevada mountains looming alongside them. After four days and nights, the two men approached Mt. Whitney. They ventured another twenty-two miles on the high plateau, crossing a number of small canyons. More than once, Mulholland and Eaton were forced to unload their packs and put their shoulders to the wheel to get the buckboard up the steep walls of rocky, dry creek beds. Finally, after passing through the desert town of Olancha, they reached their destination.
Standing bareheaded in the chill, William Mulholland beheld for the first time the breathtaking, spectacular body of water called the Owens River. Gleaming too brilliantly to look at directly in the morning sun, the vast expanse appeared in the distance like a great, silvered mirror. It meandered down the length of the valley where it discharged its waters into a large alkaline lake at the lower end. Bordered by lush salt grass, reeds, water birch, and willows, the banks of the roaring river were fined in red columbine, orchids, and tiger lilies.
Mulholland’s engineering mind could not help calculating—even amidst all this beauty—that within the Owens River were flowing at least four hundred cubic feet of water per second, enough water to provide for a city not of two hundred thousand, but of two million people. The distance to Los Angeles was overwhelming, but Mulholland knew the Owens River sat at an elevation of four thousand feet, whereas Los Angeles lay only a few feet above sea level. The water, carried in open and closed aqueducts and siphons, could arrive at Los Angeles 250 miles south by power of gravity alone. As Eaton had told Mulholland earlier, costly pumping plants would not be necessary, and not one watt of pumping power would be required. Without a doubt, Eaton had discovered the resource that, once tapped, would free their city from stagnation.
“I thought you were crazy,” Mulholland shouted to his friend over the noise of the rapidly moving water. “But our supply of water is indeed in the Owens Valley.” It was one of the supreme moments of his life, and his thoughts would return to it many times, especially during his later years, after tragedy had struck.
William Mulholland had been taken to the top of the mountain; and like Moses he had been granted a vision of his people’s deliverance. His miracle was not to part the sea, but to part the sands; not to keep the waters back, but to bring them forth and create rivers in the desert.
Mulholland and Eaton bathed in the cold, clear water, washing away the grime and sweat of their long journey. “Cleansing powers,” Mulholland exuberantly called to his buck-naked friend, commenting on the water’s purity, over the river’s roar. “And with no equal.” Mulholland, the former lumber camp stevedore, happily went unshaven, while the elegant Eaton peered at his reflection in the mirror like water and shaved with a porcelain whisker brush.
In the midst of the vast Mojave, as coyotes yapped at the moon in the inky blackness, Mulholland and Eaton huddled in the flickering glow of their campfire in the shivering cold desert night. They fondly talked about the Los Angeles which had so effectively shaped each of them and supported their careers, and about the vision they had for it once the precious water was delivered. Although only two weeks apart in age, the relationship between the sophisticated Eaton and the unleavened Mulholland had initially been that of father and son. Eaton had groomed the industrious immigrant for promotion at the Los Angeles City Water Company, and Mulholland had paid dutiful respect and allegiance to his mentor.
Eaton’s upper-class pedigree as the son of a prominent citizen and his dapper appearance contrasted sharply with Mulholland’s poor Irish beginnings and his peasant’s physique. While Mulholland’s crude repertoire of ribald jokes at times embarrassed Eaton, he still appreciated Mulholland’s disarming honesty and his simple love for literature and classical music.
In turn, Mulholland was intrigued that the smooth-mannered Eaton could guzzle hard whiskey in a smoke-filled poker game as easily as he could sip English tea at a political fundraiser. The friendship may have seemed curious, but it would prove to be the most important relationship between two men in Los Angeles’s early history.
For the next ten days, Mulholland charted the valley and the river’s course. His key problem was determining where the water could be diverted from the soda-filled Owens Lake, at a point before the river’s water gathered, then wastefully evaporated—”doing nobody any good,” except for the flocks of gathering lake birds that had adapted to its bitter salinity. He studied the problem in detail, tracing the proposed route of the aqueduct in improvised sketches and making rough surveys with an aneroid barometer and pocket level. Eaton and Mulholland calculated, measured, and debated every detail until they reached a rough agreement.
The region’s beauty continued to fascinate Mulholland. The Owens River was bordered by lush salt-grass meadows, willow trees and cottonwoods. Reeds, rushes, aster, marigolds, desert buttercups, and floral colors of pink, lavender, white, and gold thrived along its banks. The river’s waters ran the valley’s full length, and were so clear, so pure, and so cold that they offered a haven for a wide variety of trout and wildlife. The Owens Lake brimmed with fowl, from swift-flying teal to honker geese, and as Mulholland and Eaton approached the lakeshore, thousands of them lifted en masse, taking flight.
Mulholland realized that without the Owens River running through the middle of the valley, fed by the eternally melting snows from the High Sierras, the area would be as arid as the Mojave Desert and its only life would be cactus, sagebrush, and chaparral. At the lower end of the valley, the river emptied into the 73,000-acre Owens Lake, an inland alkaline sea; its high soda content rendered it useless for irrigation.
At Owens Lake, Mulholland and Eaton camped overnight, cooking a goose in an open campfire, drinking whiskey, and smoking cigars. Mulholland lay face down in the luxuriant grasses, enjoying their coolness and velvety caress against his cheek.
“How wondrous are the works of the Almighty … and man is one of them,” Mulholland murmured.
At daybreak, the two wanderers were off again. Mulholland maneuvered the buckboard through the placid valley. Eaton pointed to the abundant orchards loaded with peaches, pears, plums, and apples, and vines heavy with ripening grapes. Each ranch they passed straddled a stream from the rich river’s waters. Their irrigated acres were loaded with bountiful crops of hay, alfalfa, and cereal grasses. First settled in 1861 by hearty pioneers who arrived in covered wagons, and later by successful livestock and mining companies, the lovely valley Mulholland was now exploring had grown into a network of farm communities.
When the first pioneers entered the valley, they settled along the river banks and dug irrigation ditches with hand tools, gradually diverting the river’s adjoining streams of water onto the parched land, an acre or so at a time. For years the isolated, determined pioneers waged battle against heat, disease, famine, and floods. Slowly the desert bloomed with vegetation, and the canals were extended farther and farther from the river.
Finally, valley inhabitants constructed flood diversion canals to run down from the hills. Irrigation ditches traveled five miles or more from the river now to reach the secluded homesteaders. It was a water system that engineer Mulholland stopped to inspect and admire. Along the river, Mulholland also observed a series of small, prospering villages—Lone Pine, Independence, Big Pine, and Bishop. Unproductive land had been transformed into prosperous ranches; desert shacks had evolved into fine farmhouses, flanked by barns, silos, shade trees, and flowers. Settlers had built roads and schoolhouses. Now eight thousand people were living in the valley.
But all this wonder and bounty, wrought so tenaciously by the blistered hands of the valley natives, was virtually unknown to the far-off, troubled inhabitants of Los Angeles. Like conquering heroes, William Mulholland and Fred Eaton had discovered its beautiful secret, and as others would soon say, like thieves in the night, they were now conspiring to claim the valley’s watery lifeblood as their own—no matter what the price.
IF MULHOLLAND’S BUMPY RIDE up to the valley from Los Angeles had been enlivened with liquor, his ride back was spent ruminating over more sobering thoughts. He realized that the problems of bringing water to Los Angeles would be immense, and the physical enterprise of the construction of an aqueduct would be staggering. It would be a momentous undertaking.
Though the Panama Canal, the New York Aqueduct, and the Erie Canal were larger and vastly more expensive, this project would be unique in water engineering because of its barren mountain and desert terrains. The Owens Valley Aqueduct would be the fourth-largest engineering project to date in American history, and the longest aqueduct in the Western Hemisphere. “It was as if Boston had decided to draw its water from the St. Lawrence River, or Washington, D.C., were reaching out to the Ohio, or St. Louis were reaching across the state of Illinois to Lake Michigan, author Kevin Starr would write years later, affixing the project’s rightful place as one of the wonders of the budding twentieth century.
More important than the challenging engineering problems, Mulholland realized that such a monumental undertaking posed equally formidable political difficulties; the city council would have to approve it, though Mulholland believed they might now endorse any scheme that held promise. The thorny legal issues of water rights, city and federal approvals, and, naturally, sufficient capital would remain Mulholland’s greatest obstacles. He braced himself for the countless problems that would have to be solved before construction could even begin. Surprisingly, the most formidable barrier to the project would turn out to be the one obstacle Mulholland never considered—and would never have thought possible.
Following Mulholland and Eaton’s return to Los Angeles from their excursion in the Owens Valley, the two men embraced and said their good-byes. Eaton told Mulholland that he was traveling to San Francisco to visit his daughter. Mulholland assured Eaton that he would meet with the members of the Board of Water Commissioners and begin the battle to secure permission to build the great aqueduct.
Unbeknownst to Mulholland, Eaton boarded a train bound for New York. There he hoped to raise sufficient capital from investment bankers to secretly purchase the necessary water rights along the aqueduct route before the city had time to act. Eaton intended to sell the much-needed water to Los Angeles. The scheme, he calculated, could earn him estimated annual fees of $1.5 million. Fred Eaton’s plan was to save the city of his birth and enrich himself immeasurably at the same time.
As Mulholland met in closed-door sessions with members of the Board of Water Commissioners, he was informed of Eaton’s sudden ambition to gain control of the massive project. Mulholland was dumbfounded. Technically, there was nothing illegal in the proposal, but Eaton’s apparent betrayal gave Mulholland pause. He viewed Eaton’s deception as a personal assault and an egregious abandonment of the public trust. Mulholland feared the scheme would render the city’s water supply hostage to the interests of private owners, and jeopardize construction of the mammoth project.
Mulholland’s dream was of a vast, citizen-owned water and power system that would foster unlimited industrial and residential growth. For Mulholland, not profit but the unparalleled challenge of constructing the waterway and delivering the city from drought would be his enduring reward. For Eaton, the exploitation of Owens Valley water was an enterprise designed for financial gain.
Until now, Eaton and his protégé in the Water Department had maintained their close relationship. As a result of Eaton’s plan, their twenty-five-year-long friendship would begin to unravel, and each man would come to view the other as his most dangerous adversary.
2
Hand of Betrayal
Take heed
that ye not be deceived.
LUKE 21:8
THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS and officials from the Water Department greeted Mulholland’s revelation of the bountiful water supply in the Owens Valley with enthusiasm if not hosannas. But when they learned of Eaton’s intentions to feather his own nest from the project at the city’s expense, they were appalled that one of their own, a former city mayor, had decided to unfairly impede the city’s progress.
Mulholland quickly contacted City Attorney and Water Department Chief Counsel William B. Mathews, who, by happenstance, was in New York City, and asked him to meet with Eaton and persuade him to call off his plan.
Mathews quickly learned it was too late. Eaton had already secured options on key tracts of Owens Valley land. Eaton announced that the Owens River water was now exclusively in his hands and that he intended to develop and control all hydroelectric power generated from the proposed aqueduct. Mathews relayed Eaton’s grandiose ambitions to an outraged Mulholland.
To resolve the stalemate, Mulholland called upon a longtime colleague, Joseph Lippincott, a man who could change loyalties like a chameleon changes color, to act on the city’s behalf and talk sense to Eaton. Lippincott had been in the Owens Valley as an official of the U.S. Reclamation Service, examining the feasibility there of a giant federal irrigation project. If the federal plan went forward, all the necessary land and water rights would be transferred from private to public ownership. Lippincott shrewdly told Eaton that the Reclamation Service would not withdraw from the Owens Valley unless the Los Angeles Aqueduct was “public-owned from one end to the other.” With this news, Lippincott undercut Eaton’s lofty dream of private water wealth.
Eaton quickly returned to the bargaining table with a new and more ominous scheme. Eaton had managed to obtain a valuable $450,000 option on cattleman Thomas B. Rickey’s expansive Owens Valley ranch. To the wealthy and eccentric Rickey, the property—called “Long Valley”—was merely 25,000 acres of grazing land. To Eaton, it was the site for the only feasible reservoir in the valley, a level stretch of meadowland 20 square miles in size, with the potential to store approximately 183,000 acre feet of water. Eaton knew a massive storage reservoir at Long Valley would be critical to the long-term success of the aqueduct. In a transaction that should take its place alongside the purchase of Manhattan Island, Eaton only had to hand over a good-faith deposit of $100 cash to Rickey to bind the deal.
Eaton returned to Los Angeles and offered Mulholland a new compromise. Eaton would sell his Owens Valley land options and associated water rights to the city but insisted on keeping half of the Rickey lands for himself. He would retain 12,000 prime acres of the existing Rickey ranch (including the valuable Long Valley reservoir site) and extend a perpetual easement to the city for construction of a small reservoir at Long Valley. If the city did not accept his offer, Eaton told Mulholland, he would use the ranch as a haven for his budding cattle empire and take his offer elsewhere. There were others who would pay handsomely for an option on land sorely needed by the city of Los Angeles.
Eaton’s threat triggered a wave of alarm in the halls of the Water Department where officials recognized the land’s value. They would be forced to pay the price to the owner, whoever it might be, and better the devil they knew than some Eastern syndicate that might drive the price beyond reach. Eaton then added to tensions by speaking with reporters about his intentions in the Owens Valley and his comments made front-page news:
Were it not for the fact that Los Angeles must accept the proposition as presented or lose all hope of saving itself from water famine, I would like to see the scheme defeated. This water right is a valuable thing and if it were not for the fact that the city would be robbed of what it needs most I would like to have them throw the lands back onto my hands.
Enraged at Eaton’s self-serving public statements, and fearing the city council’s ratification of the project was jeopardized, Mulholland clashed with Eaton in heated arguments for two straight days. The secrecy surrounding the aqueduct route was disintegrating, posing the threat of land speculation, and Mulholland was weary from long arguments and futile pleas; he finally reached a verbal settlement with Eaton in June 1905. The City of Los Angeles would accept Eaton’s demands: In addition to his $450,000 price, Eaton received the 12,000-acre ranch, 4,000 head of cattle, horses, mules, and farm equipment—a sizeable return from his modest investment. He earned an additional $100,000 on commissions for other properties he secured on behalf of the city.
To celebrate, Eaton hosted an informal reception at the posh California Club, an exclusive men’s club where Water Department officials and invited V.I.P.s met to congratulate him on his successful efforts in securing water rights for Los Angeles. Both Mulholland and W. B. Mathews were in attendance; despite the hair-splitting sessions they had been enmeshed in only days earlier, the three men drank heavily into the early hours of the morning and generously toasted the success of their future enterprise.
Eaton continued to ruminate over his lost multi-million-dollar dream. He felt his share of profits for solving the city’s water problems was pitifully small and he was convinced he had needlessly sacrificed his financial ambition for an ungrateful city. “I have not received one dollar of city money, not even for expenses,” Eaton complained to the press. Walking with a slight limp, his face pale and drawn, he appeared exhausted, and confided to friends that he was suffering from a severe attack of rheumatism brought on by his continued travels into the high altitudes of the Owens River country. “I have lived in this western country long enough to know what water is worth,’’ Eaton blasted. “I probably know better than anyone else how much I could have made out of that option on the Rickey property. Private capital is waiting to put a million more into that valley than the city is buying it for.”
Eaton worked himself into a frenzy decrying his loss of profits through civic fidelity. “Why, yesterday,” Eaton moaned to the Examiner,” the old man Rickey came to scold me because I had thrown away a chance whereby we could have gone in together and made a big pile of money. He said I beat him and myself out of at least half a million.”
Despite the warm reception of friends and colleagues who celebrated his civic beneficence, privately, Eaton was increasingly alienated. He was convinced he had been cheated out of a fortune and vowed to Mulholland that he would make no further concessions regarding the Rickey ranch.
Just days after the ebullient party at the California Club, Mulholland and Mathews re-examined their deal with Eaton, and soberly realized the city required a larger reservoir. They approached Eaton again, hoping to secure a more extensive easement in Long Valley which could be employed when the city grew large enough to require a permanent storage reservoir. Eaton told Mulholland and Mathews that he had given them “damn well enough for the money” and would not let them “flood his valley” under any circumstances.
Mulholland had intended to construct a 140-foot dam at Long Valley whose storage capacity would be double that of all other possible reservoir sites. Had he been able to erect a dam on the Long Valley site, Mulholland would have assured Los Angeles a supply sufficient to meet its needs through even the most prolonged droughts. Mulholland’s plan would have preserved the Owens Valley as well and allotted residents enough water to keep 80,000 acres of first-class farmland under cultivation. It was Eaton’s standoff over Long Valley which guaranteed, as William Kahrl wrote, “that there would be insufficient water for both Los Angeles and Owens Valley in any future drought, and gave birth to the bitter Los Angeles Aqueduct controversy and the basis for the eventual sacrifice of Owens Valley.”
The bargaining became so heated that Mulholland and Mathews left, threatening that “everything was off.” But the next day they returned and obtained Eaton’s begrudging consent to a reservoir only one hundred feet high.
As a consequence of Eaton’s restriction, the city was forced to construct the needed reservoir elsewhere, a decision that would trigger far greater tragedy and ill will than Eaton’s clever machinations in 1905 could justify. To some, Mulholland committed a major error in failing to secure the Long Valley reservoir site, and he would later be accused of snubbing his nose at a more practical resolution with Eaton out of “petty niggardliness and almost fanatical pride.”
The two men’s deep-rooted feelings of mutual resentment were kept from public scrutiny. Despite the thorny contracts they hammered out, Mulholland and Eaton were forced by circumstance to unite publicly in their efforts to sell the project to the citizens and the press. In public they appeared cordial and warm although Eaton now maintained little enthusiasm for the Owens River project since he stood to profit less by it.
THOUGH FIFTY-ONE YEARS OLD, with hair nearly white (from two years of haggling in the Owens Valley, he claimed), Eaton was still remarkably handsome. In June 1906, fit and trim, suffering only from an occasional bout of rheumatism, Eaton quietly slipped into the city attorney’s office at noon to marry his second wife, twenty-four-year-old city office stenographer Alice B. Slosson. Eaton intended to spend his honeymoon at Long Valley and designed a special heavy-duty motor car to traverse the sands of the desert and the little traveled roads of the valley.
On hearing news of the marriage, Mulholland immediately sent Eaton a letter of congratulations, and recalled the day he confided to Eaton plans of his own impending marriage. Four years after he had succeeded Eaton as Chief Superintendent of the Los Angeles City Water Company, Mulholland married Lillie Ferguson, a fair-skinned, dark-haired native of Port Huron, Michigan. Lillie gave birth to their first child, Rose, one year later. She later bore him four more children: two daughters, Lucille and Ruth, and two sons, Perry and Thomas.
By year’s end, Eaton had established a permanent residence at the Long Valley ranch, commuting to Los Angeles with his new bride once a month. His world had changed drastically. Once viewed by valley residents as their betrayer, he now seemed one of their own after his protracted bitter fight with the city. Soon this ex-mayor of Los Angeles would become the premier citizen of the Owens Valley.
3
Sweet Stolen Water
Ho, everyone that thirsteth,
come ye to the waters.
ISA. 55:1
AT A SECRET MEETING with members of the Board of Water Commissioners and leading Water Department officials, newspaper owners were informed of Mulholland’s visionary plan to build the longest aqueduct in the world. Fearing that Owens Valley land prices would skyrocket if news of the mammoth undertaking were publicized, publishers were sworn to secrecy in an unusual “gentleman’s agreement.”
To thwart speculation, the city had arranged to send Eaton back to the Owens Valley to acquire the necessary remaining options on downstream water rights below Long Valley. Furnished with official credentials (provided by the ever-agreeable Lippincott) which seemingly identified him as an agent of the federal government, Eaton met with unsuspecting Owens Valley farmers who thought they were aiding the proposed federal reclamation project as they signed over their water rights to the city, instead. On the same day that the Reclamation Service publicly announced that it was abandoning its project in favor of Los Angeles, Mulholland and Eaton returned to Los Angeles after a last buying spree in the Valley. “The last spike is driven,” Mulholland happily announced to Water Department officers. “The options are all secured.”
The city’s deception at the expense of the unsuspecting Owens Valley landholders apparently was complete. Now the newspapers could make their simultaneous announcements of William Mulholland’s plan for the great man-made river that would bring water to Los Angeles. Mulholland knew that the newspapers’ editorials had to convince the people that the project was both necessary and urgent, so they would act quickly to approve millions of dollars in bonds and new tax assessments. Within twenty-four hours, the news would be public.
Unfortunately, the fourth estate’s gentleman’s agreement was breached. On the same day as Mulholland’s announcement, an alert reporter in Independence wired the Los Angeles Times with the scoop of a lifetime. Fearing that the story might break first in the Owens Valley newspapers or leak from other sources, editors of the Los Angeles Times decided they dared not wait the remaining twenty-four hours before making their announcement. The following morning, Times’sheadlines blared: “Titanic Project to Give City a River!”
Its front page revealed the city’s whole plan, causing perplexed readers to consult their atlases to pinpoint the Owens River. Los Angeles readers responded to the news with acclamations of joy as they read about the “concrete river” which promised to increase their number to two million and transform the sun-baked San Fernando Valley into an agriculture-rich Eden. City water officials could not have written the story better.
“To put it mildly, the values of all San Fernando Valley lands will be doubled by the acquisition of this new water supply,” stated the Times grandly but inaccurately. Within ten days of the story San Fernando Valley properties soared five hundred percent. Land options were gobbled up by competing realtors and new buildings sprouted over the arid land like mushrooms after a spring rain. Such was the force of the news that feelings of renewed wealth, prosperity, happiness, and fortune descended upon the city—even though nothing had happened yet.
Meanwhile, a number of rival Los Angeles newspapers (chief among them William Randolph Hearst’s Los Angeles Examiner) ,which had agreed to hold back the aqueduct story until given the nod by water officials, smarted over the embarrassing scoop by the double-crossing Times . Hearst began a long series of diatribes against the Times’s editors, who responded in kind with heated accusations.
Insult led to insult, and soon a full-scale newspaper war raged. As vitriolic accusations were hurled from both sides and circulations skyrocketed, Angelenos followed the battling dailies with varying allegiances.
Meanwhile the people in the Owens Valley were outraged to learn not only of the federal government’s desertion but of the predictions of their bleak future. “It probably means the wiping out of the town of Independence,” stated the Times flatly, and a quote attributed to Mulholland that the land in the valley was “so poor that it didn’t pay to irrigate it” added fuel to their mounting anger.
In Bishop the day the aqueduct story broke, Fred Eaton faced a menacing crowd of farmers enraged at what they considered their victimization by the former Los Angeles mayor. They threatened to string a noose around his neck. Barely escaping with his life, Eaton denied any wrongdoing, later announcing in an Owens Valley newspaper that he planned to spend his now considerable wealth and remainder of his life in the valley, adding, “in being a good neighbor I shall have an opportunity to retrieve myself and clear away all unhappy recollections.” Then, once back in Los Angeles, he vented his rage upon water officials for allowing the Times to place him in such a life-threatening position. “They say I sold them out, sold them out and the government too; that I shall never take the water out of the valley; that when I go back for my cattle they will drown me in the river.”
For his own dubious role in the scheme, Joseph Lippincott did not escape the rage of the duped valley citizens. His actions were criticized even in the Oval Office, where impassioned pleas were put before President Theodore Roosevelt by Owens Valley citizens and their congressional representatives to restore the Reclamation Service’s original water project in the valley. As hostile feelings continued to grow among Owens Valley ranchers, area newspapers launched virulent attacks on Lippincott and “the Los Angeles cabal of water-seekers.” Hatred for Lippincott, the man whom valley dwellers felt betrayed them most, ran so high that one angry crowd plotted to kidnap him, but at the last minute failed to carry out their plan.
In Washington, the Reclamation Service officials acted quickly to rid themselves of Lippincott’s taint by demanding his removal from office. Lippincott quickly resigned and almost immediately was offered a more remunerative, $6,000-a-year job with the Los Angeles Board of Public Works. He would join Mulholland on the city’s payroll as Assistant Chief Engineer of the Los Angeles Aqueduct.
On the Monday following the Los Angeles Times announcement, members of the Los Angeles City Council met to order an immediate polling on the issuance of $1.5 million in bonds to pay for land and water rights purchases in the Owens Valley. The first of two bond ballots (the first in 1905 for $1.5 million for land rights and the second in 1907 for $23 million in construction costs) was to be held on September 7, only three weeks away, notoriously the hottest time of the year. The council then adjourned to a champagne luncheon with William Mulholland, Fred Eaton, W. B. Mathews and the city’s Board of Water Commissioners.
For the next three weeks, Eaton and Mulholland launched a vigorous round of campaigning, speech-making, and pressing the flesh. Night after night, they visited civic groups to urge their vote. Despite Eaton’s waning enthusiasm as dreams of his potential windfall dwindled, his own interests forced him to continue his role as a leading project advocate.
Conveniently, the September heat delivered the final touch. As temperatures exceeded 100 degrees prior to the election and as water levels concurrently dipped, Mulholland used the city’s oldest enemy—drought—to scare the daylights out of the hot and thirsty citizens.
In his basic stump speech, Mulholland wiped his sweating brow with his handkerchief and sympathized with the sweltering and tired members of his audience. He decried the “current emergency,” warning that the entire city would soon be bone-dry. As the hot spell continued and water consumption skyrocketed, Mulholland refused to let the events go unheralded.
“This illustrates better than anything else could, the absolute necessity for securing a source of water supply elsewhere,” he announced. “We must have it”
And have it they did. The Chamber of Commerce, the Municipal League, the Merchants and Manufacturers Association, and all leading civic and commercial organizations threw their zealous support behind the bond issue. Boosters heralded the gigantic undertaking as the key to creating a Garden of Eden in the southland, thus assuring Los Angeles’s future prominence as one of the world’s great cities.
Detractors pulverized the project as ill-conceived and ripe for graft, designed to make a handful of important men fabulously wealthy while bankrupting the citizens of Los Angeles with over-taxation. In one stinging charge that left the natives of Owens Valley feeling both irate and joyous, a respected Pasadena physician announced that his scientific tests revealed that Owens River water was a “vile bed of typhoid germs,” and therefore, unfit to drink.
Mulholland, Eaton, and their entourage of assistants continued to feast and boost, sometimes challenging their endurance by dining at three or more banquets during the course of a single evening as they traveled from one appearance to the next. After delivering their speeches, they were applauded, interviewed, and photographed, and the two men would often conclude their remarks standing side by side with arms uplifted in victory, looking very much like a presidential ticket.
At one highly publicized appearance before the Municipal League at the stylish Westminster Hotel in downtown Los Angeles, William Mulholland was received with unrestrained enthusiasm. Prominent businessmen, members of the city council and judiciary, bankers, lawyers, and publishers—all the movers and shakers of the city with the means to get any issue off the ground—listened intently in concerned silence as he began a passionate appeal. By meeting’s end, Mulholland had whipped the room into a frothy intensity, like a preacher conducting an old-fashioned revival meeting.
“If we could only make the people see the precarious condition in which Los Angeles stands!” pleaded Mulholland. “If we could only pound it in to them!” he added, pounding his own meaty fist.
“If Los Angeles runs out of water for one week the city within a year will not have a population of 100,000 people. A city quickly finds its level and that level is its water supply!”
Waves of wild applause erupted into bursts of cheers and whistles. Like the consummate stage performer he had become, Mulholland knew instinctively how to win his audience.
Historians disagree on how grave the “water famine” was that faced the city of Los Angeles in 1905. Some speculate that the drought was really a brilliantly orchestrated scare tactic. But internal memoranda from the Department of Water and Power and Mulholland’s own correspondence indicate that prior to the election he had been forced by outright necessity to prohibit the sprinkling of lawns, restrict water flow into city fountains and parks, and order strict prohibitions of sewer flushing and domestic household water waste in order to preserve the water supply. He frantically installed elaborate pumping devices in underground artesian wells, and, when that failed, halted irrigation in the San Fernando Valley. Infuriated San Fernando farmers sued, causing Mulholland to spend countless hours at the county courthouse defending his department’s actions.
Mulholland claimed reservoir levels during this period were the lowest he had ever seen. Weeks before the election, during the hottest part of the summer, the Buena Vista Reservoir’s supply had fallen eight feet by 10 A.M. and sunk yet another foot before nightfall. Mulholland assessed the situation as critical and mandated a reduced water consumption of one million gallons a day. The city, Mulholland concluded solemnly, now “faced outright water famine.”
Though he may have resorted to some exaggeration in his plea for votes, official records substantiate that Los Angeles’s water supply had declined rapidly by 1905, and his concern for the city was genuine.
In the Owens Valley, local newspapers woefully predicted the valley’s own demise and encouraged prominent citizens to fight the “water poachers” all the way to the White House if necessary. A bill was sponsored in Congress by wealthy anti-aqueduct landholders to prevent Los Angeles from using any Owens water for irrigation, but in a midnight meeting at the White House, President Theodore Roosevelt, who had signed the Reclamation Act to maximize use of natural resources, predictably vetoed the bill, giving Los Angeles permission to do with the water what it wanted.
GOSSIP AND INNUENDO surrounding Fred Eaton’s financial interest in the aqueduct fizzled and by election day, he was virtually approbation-free. But shortly before the voters were to cast their ballots, new rumors surfaced that a powerful land syndicate had secretly bought up land options in the arid San Fernando Valley and stood to make millions when the aqueduct water arrived. Revelation of the syndicate’s existence immediately threw the whole campaign into a tailspin, and posed the most blistering threat to passage of the bond issue.
Weeks before the election, the Los Angeles Examiner, still smarting over the Times’s scoop, broke a story some called the “Scandal of the Century” and claimed that through illicit communications long before the aqueduct’s plan was made public, wealthy men were allowed to buy up San Fernando Valley lands at bargain prices.
The Examiner revealed that almost a year earlier on November 28, 1904, less than three months from the day Mulholland and Eaton set out in their buckboard for the Owens Valley, a syndicate of private investors, acting on inside information supposedly limited to government officials, purchased a $50,000 option on the Porter Lands—16,200 arid acres in the north end of the uninhabitable and unfarmable San Fernando Valley—an option that, if the aqueduct were to be constructed, would be worth millions of dollars. The Examiner named ten syndicate members, each of whom held one thousand shares in the “San Fernando Mission Land Company,” at a par value of $100 per share. The list included Leslie C. Brand, president of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company, raft magnate Henry E. Huntington, Edward H. Harriman of the Union Pacific, W. G. Kerchoff, president of Pacific Light and Power, and Joseph F. Sartori, president of the Security Trust Savings Bank. Of special interest to the tabloid writers were syndicate members Harrison Gray Otis, publisher of the Times; Edwin Earl of the Express; and Moses Hazeltine Sherman, trolley magnate and member of the Los Angeles Board of Water Commissioners.
The Examiner claimed that this syndicate, which had paid $35 an acre for the Porter Ranch, stood to make a profit of $5,546,000, as land values increased from $200 to $4,000 an acre. Although the option had been arranged before the syndicate learned the full details of the aqueduct’s proposal, members of the group benefited handsomely from inside information provided by Moses H. Sherman who, as a member of the Los Angeles Board of Water Commissioners, could not have been a better set of eyes and ears. Apparently, he leaked Mulholland’s intentions to build the giant system to his colleagues. Thanks to Sherman’s dual role as Water Board Commissioner and syndicate investor, his cohorts were fully apprised of the city’s plans in the Owens Valley, and were able to exercise their options on the Porter Ranch the same day that Fred Eaton telegraphed the water commission that his option on the Rickey ranch in Long Valley had been secured.
“Why should Mr. Eaton and his conferees have given the profitable tip to Messrs. Otis, Earl & Co.?” queried the Examiner. “Was this a consideration for newspaper support?”