Acknowledgements

Thanks to Chris Charlesworth and Andy Neill at Omnibus Press.

Guy Garvey, Mark Potter, Craig Potter, Pete Turner, Richard Jupp, John Bramwell and the great I Am Kloot, Guy Lovelady and Ugly Man, one of Manchester’s mightiest labels, Andy Rourke, John Nuttall, Todd Eckhart, Chris Hewitt and Ozit Morpheus, Tony Michaelides, Michael Mackey, Dave Haslam, Sue Langford, Simon Donahue, Barney Hoskyns, Terry Christian, Mark Radcliffe, Dermo Northside, Clint Boon, Phil Chadwick, Michael Winterbottom, Chris Coupe, George Borowski, Henry Normal, Doves, Pete Jobson, Blueprint Studios, John Robb, Simon Reynolds, Tim and Maxi Hudson, Joe Matera, Luke Turner, Sean McGhee, Julia Adamson, Gary Atkinson, CP and Pam Lee, Mark Hodkinson, Ro and John Barrat.

Special thanks to: Lindsay Reade, Tosh Ryan, Kathryn Turner, Karen Middlehurst, Julie Howard and Katrina and Ben Cross of Bribie Island and all at the Warrington Guardian.

Sources: BBC 6 Music, The Bury Times, Clash, Classic Rock, The Daily Telegraph, Granada Television, The Guardian, The Independent, The Manchester Busker, Manchester Evening News, Manchester Festival, MOJO, Panache, Q, The Quietus, Record Collector, The Rochdale Observer, Rock’n’Reel, Rock’s Back Pages, Subculture Manchester, The Times and Unconvention/Blueprint Studios.

Introduction

It’s now mid-2009 and Elbow stand at the crossroads. Almost two decades of history lies in their wake. Eighteen years of being in the shadows; four albums, several hundred gigs, several million whispers, the friendly voice of anti-celebrity. For so long they had remained the secret of some kind of underground; a hidden beauty and a dark enigma, sumptuous and ever-so-slightly illicit.

How things have changed. The band’s hugely celebrated triumph of 2008 has hurtled them towards a giant audience, with one song in particular, ‘One Day Like This’, seeping from the walls that guarded that secret, on to radio and television, soundtracking documentary and sports shows alike. Elbow have finally received the attention they always deserved and seemed destined never to find.

But who are the invisible masses who purchased Elbow’s Mercury Prize, Brit Award winning The Seldom Seen Kid? I have an intelligent, articulate friend who has listened attentively to all of Elbow’s albums, has watched them at a variety of mud-splattered English festivals and yet still, somehow, doesn’t get it.

“I can’t grasp what is special here,” she admitted, just a week ago.

“How do you know when you are an Elbow fan?”

Not a bad question, actually. There is no question of genre here. You don’t belong to any known club. Despite Elbow’s comparatively advanced years, it doesn’t appear to be an age thing at all.

“When did you first get Elbow?” she enquired.

My mind flashed back to sparsely attended gigs in darkened cellars on Manchester’s Oldham Street. Although I had seen the comparatively youthful band on a small number of occasions at gigs in the city’s Northern Quarter, I hadn’t quite connected with them, despite the fact I was a long-term admirer of some of the people closest to them – John Bramwell, I Am Kloot and Doves among others. It took something precise, different and utterly personal to find myself in a position to be touched by Elbow.

It was my birthday. It was painful. I was out and I was arguing. Arguing with a woman I loved who had, it seemed, ‘moved on’.

Suffice it to say, the evening didn’t end well. I arrived home with a bunch of birthday presents, finding myself drifting into that surreal state of heartbreak. One of these presents happened to be Elbow’s first album, the reflective, forceful, poetic beauty titled Asleep In The Back. It somehow seemed such an unlikely present and Elbow, I truly thought, had seen their moment wither and die. But there was something special there.

I played it twice through on the hop. It wasn’t the standard ‘break-up’, album and, like some, I always had Dylan’s Blood On The Tracks on standby, just in case things went badly wrong. It wasn’t remotely twee or hugely self-indulgent either. Nor did it seem maudlin. There was something almost joyful about a lyric that began in a dark place and twisted into a barrage of surreal imagery – uplifting imagery.

I only vaguely knew who singer Guy Garvey was as his Bury roots didn’t exactly shine through. But I loved the way that Elbow seemed wholly unafraid to use pre-punk influences; Pink Floyd most obviously, but I heard all kinds of bands that might appear unhip – there was even a touch of ELO in there. By the end of the second play-through, I was smiling while sinking the Merlot. Elbow were already a special band.

I was a fan. It was an inner thing. I had sat down that night, thoroughly expecting another chunk of dross aiming for indie-landfill. I was wrong. In time Elbow would become – Radiohead fans stay calm – the greatest British band of their time. If you had told me this at the time, I wouldn’t have been surprised.

The basic notion behind this book stretches back several years. At the time, the subject wasn’t to be centred solely on Elbow and, in fact, came with a different and self-explanatory title: ‘Pounding’ Doves, I Am Kloot, Elbow and the Sound of the Manchester Underground. It was in that order of eminence too, with Elbow, rock’s perennial underachievers, most definitely Manchester’s best kept secret. There are echoes of that lost and never-to-be-written book here.

For so many years, this was the position inhabited by Elbow. When trying to convey frustration whenever some shallow new pop sensation would grasp the media spotlight, I thought, “What about bloody Elbow? They have no chance, this day and age.”

Elbow are a triumph of heart over empty style, of emotion over the superficial, of reality over celebrity. They are a reactionary band in the sense that they have retreated to the days when musicality was good and image was of secondary importance. For Elbow are nothing if not multi-dimensional. Funk boys and indie scallywags one minute, heartfelt soul boys and shameless proggers the next. This is the most obvious reason why Elbow are loved, for they represent the best of all the great music that has permeated our lives over the years. Good taste in short.

That alone would be enough. But there is a rare honesty here; reportage, if you like, of everyday life. Garvey’s celebrated lyricism is, at once, childish and bristling with intelligence. It speaks a simplistic language and, by tradition, it has no place at the front of such sophisticated music. When, post-Mercury Awards, Elbow performed with a full orchestra, the lyrics occasionally seemed ill-fitting. This is a now time-honoured Garvey trick – the paradox of beautiful orchestration underlying outbursts of everyday Northern angst. After a while, after several listens, what seems awkward suddenly seems perfectly natural. That’s a vision of an artist in the true sense of the word.

It’s exactly what Guy Garvey is – in a similar way to Morrissey or Mark E. Smith. However, there lies another difference for Garvey, by many accounts, is wholly approachable, not the celebrated curmudgeon as in Smith or the wholly aloof Morrissey. He is often to be seen wandering along Manchester’s Oxford Road, frequenting a number of local bars, often standing alone and perfectly willing to chat to anyone who happens by. Yet this affable giant of a man is also known for not answering text messages, not replying to phone calls, not returning communication. A naturally reticent man, whose shyness informs his music. As with all shy people, it’s easy to misunderstand, to underrate, and to dismiss, one reason why so many years passed without Elbow making any serious headway.

However, when the message finally emerged to a large market, it was all the more powerful for its time in the shadows. It is, therefore, the true sound of the underground.

Chapter One
Bury and Bryan

The heart of Lancashire, the hub of the industrial revolution, is surrounded by evocative Cottonopolis. The names of the towns close by – Preston, Burnley, Rochdale, Wigan, Oldham, Blackburn – resonate with images of cultural clichés; the dark Satanic rows of red brick terraces, sprawling markets, hearts of gold and grit. The evocative northern imagery still exists and, without doubt, in all the Lancashire towns, there still exist elements of day-to-day strife. But there is also considerable regeneration. The Pennine—Lancashire dream, inspired, in part, by Tony Wilson and logoed by Peter Saville, has seen the area shift to a new contemporary level, as far from Lowry-esque landscapes as it is possible to get.

Despite this, Bury is slightly closer to Manchester than the other towns, its true cultural neighbour being the Salford of Prestwich, Cheetham Hill, Sedgley Park, Heaton Park, all languishing significantly on the other side of the M60 ring road. Bury is indicative of the north Manchester psyche. In musical terms, this is important. Think of Mark E. Smith and his lifelong home of Prestwich, his band, The Fall, a Salfordian dream, a north Manchester attitude against Factory Records with its sharp sleeves and contrived images.

“We couldn’t ever have signed for Factory … southern Manchester trendies … we are fro ‘up here’”

“Up here” evoking the aloofness of satellite towns. Nowhere is this more epitomised than Bury. More relevant is the fact that Smith’s iconic ‘diamond’ knotted jumper of 1979 had been purchased by his mother from Bury’s famous market. A jumper from Bury market could be seen as the ultimate riposte to the lavishly garbed new romantic creatures of London’s Camden.

In Smith’s florid lyricism, Bury was symbolic in the sense that, in his eyes, it was a town of grounded intelligence as opposed to Stockport’s shiny car pretensions. Equally interesting was Bury’s Square One Studios. Back in the mid Eighties, this pristine rectangular studio provided a north Manchester alternative to Stockport’s Strawberry Studios, which had been producing high quality Manchester recordings since the late Sixties. Typically of Bury, Square One seemed a deliberately businesslike, pedantic studio, bereft of the cosy glamour of Strawberry, which had been built from the base of the 10cc/Mindbenders musician clique.

In the mid Eighties, north Manchester bands such as The Chameleons and The Monkey Run produced recordings of comparable sheen from the Bury studio.

But back then songwriting seemed a lost and archaic art. The very idea of a rock band or a singer-songwriter evening would be the subject of hip youthful mockery. “Guitars are for dads. Singer-songwriters? Do me a favour.” And yet Elbow, who would emerge into the mainstream some two decades down the line, were firmly rooted in such an esteemed tradition. Equally bizarre, the band most closely associated with Elbow, if only for their age, geographical location and facial hair, were Doves – a band firmly rooted not in the singer-songwriter genre but on the Hacienda dancefloor and, in their previous incarnation as Sub-Sub, scoring chart success during the age of ‘Madchester’.

Crafted songwriting was not for the hedonists of distinction, who crammed the postulating vibe of the Hacienda. The media came to Manchester to witness an orgy of dance, of beer-bellied men in orange T-shirts, girls spinning around the edge of the dance floor, the idiotic worship of the DJ, the imported sounds of the E generation.

That’s not to knock it too much – the movement was a release of energy, a “flash”, if one was to take music journalist Simon Reynolds’ line, that pushed music to a new level and certainly pushed Manchester to a new level, pumping youth and vibrancy into the city’s ongoing regeneration plan. In the wake of Happy Mondays, the shape-shifting local bands suddenly pushed the rhythm, becoming both danceable and bankable. Even James, one-time purveyors of weird folk, were transformed into an awkwardly effective semi-dance act and, in their wake, The Mock Turtles, spinning from sullen indie to enter the realms of the new psychedelia, as well as a host of others, from World Of Twist to Northside.

The media camped on Whitworth Street, filtering the message across the world. Manchester had become a home of dance and ecstasy, garbed in Gio Goi, the streetwise threads of Happy Mondays, supplied by brilliant chancers the Bagianno brothers. In the city centre it sure was kicking off, but slowly turning from Day-Glo to darkness.

While the Hacienda captured headlines, at the other end of Whitworth Street, within the railway arch named The Green Room, emerged a wholly different and individual artistic upsurge, seemingly unloved, profoundly unhip and unhyped, apart from in the local press. An event called The Manchester Busker started to silently gather pace. It was simple in format and, I proudly state, partly instigated by the author, who deserves none of the credit, which is all due to the tireless work of promoter Chris Coupe and business partner Damian Brehony, together known as CC Brickwall.

Mocked by those seemingly in the know, these singer-songwriters, comedians and ranting poets, by a painfully slow process, started to build their own audience. From this lost breed came a rich seam of talent – filtering out from Caroline Aherne’s initial success as Sister Mary Immaculate and Mrs Merton, who began life as a Frank Sidebottom character. Beyond that came Steve Coogan and Henry Normal, his partner in Baby Cow Productions, rising from being a lonely, penniless poet living in the darkened rooms of Failsworth sending off demo tapes to local papers, to Henry Normal, the unlikely saviour of the British comedy empire, now collector of BAFTAS…

Why is this relevant to a book about Elbow?

Beyond the success of Coogan, Normal, Aherne, Craig Cash et al, were the songwriters who punctuated those Manchester Busker performances, great, royally ignored lost talents who believed wholeheartedly in the power of the song. The small but big-hearted singer-songwriter John Bramwell, known as Johnny Dangerously who, years down the line, would re-emerge to worldwide cultish appeal as the idiosyncratic songwriting force behind I Am Kloot. Through a series of albums filled with disparate songs, filching from every given genre, I Am Kloot slowly evolved into a genuine triumph of unfettered songwriting.

There were others. Perennial Manchester ‘outsider’ songwriter George Borowski, previously known as ‘Guitar George’ and still, as I write, releasing great and ignored albums, lost classics. And, of course, the late Bryan Glancy, now known as the muse behind Elbow, the man to whom the band dedicated their Mercury Prize.

A gentle soul locked in an unlikely place where The Velvet Underground might meet Neil Young … and in that class, too. A lost, legendary, shadowy figure in shades, self-effacing, darkly, unfashionably ‘nice’, popping up, mid-set, to deliver ‘Propping Up The Bar’, a great little gem among a nest of great little gems.

Bryan was all heart, all vision, all talent – attributes that were largely absent during the days of Happy Mondays. However there was no visible bitterness with Bryan. He became known as a perennial scenester; a big-hearted ferocious enthusiast, introducing people to people, musicians to musicians, and journalists to journalists, not for his own gain.

At the turn of the Nineties, Glancy and Dangerously could be seen almost nightly on small pub stages, arts centres and semi-comedy venues of Manchester. It was a world away from the Hacienda’s famous thrust, but no less valuable. I recall talking to Bryan at a Busker event at The Romiley Forum in Cheshire.

“What on Earth are we doing playing out here?” he laughed. “It’s because you live here, don’t you? And you will give us a write-up.”

It was and I did. That night, alone on an unlikely stage, Bryan was little short of awesome before a first-time audience comprising parochial strays catching an easy night out. A gathering who, upon entering, had little idea of what a Manchester Busker event might be, an audience not entirely suited to the charms of Johnny Dangerously and Bryan Glancy.

The story of Elbow begins here because, as Guy Garvey would often state, both Johnny and Bryan would become massively important in Elbow’s development. Glancy would gain a shadowy omnipresence in the echoes of all four albums to date by Elbow, who would make certain that his name would never be forgotten.

Although Elbow would be forever associated with the songwriting fringes of the Manchester music scene and would garner much fondness for that, things are not always so black and white. In a March 2009 interview with Q magazine, Guy Garvey expressed the view that, without The Stone Roses, Elbow would never have existed. “They left a legacy, the Roses,” Garvey stated. “That style of rhythm-wah that John Squire played on that first record is what every 15-year-old lad goes for. Even now. They start with the Roses and move forward.”

As a 15-year-old lad Garvey would take the train from Bury into Manchester every weekend. It was a complete look, part encouraged by the hippy style of his sisters, now morphed into the Madchester scene that couldn’t help but affect him. It was, as he stated, “like United and City”, the choice was simple. Happy Mondays, with their loose funk rave and state of seemingly endless party, or The Stone Roses, fully embracing the dance scene and yet retaining the distance of a proper band. Garvey naturally swung to the latter as he had spent years listening to the late Sixties music that was such a heady influence on the Roses. The Byrds, Joni Mitchell, James Taylor, Neil Young, Crosby, Stills & Nash, Grateful Dead as well as Fairport Convention, John Martyn and Nick Drake.

“… Everybody started dressing like it was a retake on Woodstock,” Garvey told Uncut. “It was just amazing. It was all right for lads to wear flowers and stuff again. I had a paisley bandana, a pair of massive 16-inch bellbottom jeans and floral hoodies a go-go.”

Garvey’s Roses fixation came to a head when, following a period of exile, NME tracked the band down to Bury’s Square One Studios, much to the amazement of Guy himself.

“It was like Whistle Down The Wind where she thinks she has found Jesus in a barn. The whole world was looking for them [The Stone Roses] and they were in our hometown.”

Funnily enough, future Elbow guitarist Mark Potter was working as a pizza delivery boy in Bury and, to his utter astonishment, found himself delivering to The Stone Roses at Square One. The only problem being that no one in the town would believe him. Not that it mattered. The link had been made. The Stone Roses, already one classic album deep into their own legend, had become little short of gods on the streets of places like Bury. Despite having been rather disliked by the Manchester elite for some years, the Roses had become more than a band – they were a look, an attitude, a grimace, the first truly ‘Manc’ band. Their studied belligerence would be copied half a decade later with the sudden explosion of Oasis.

There were obvious differences between Elbow and The Stone Roses; Elbow would not become ‘style icons’, front a new upsurge or movement, marry rock to dance or become synonymous with any kind of serious ‘attitude’. Nevertheless, there would be similarities between the early years of both bands. The Stone Roses, it is often forgotten, spent a number of years floundering in an unfashionable obscurity, their glittering talent failing to dent the rather closed shop in their own city; their early rockist leanings – which seem so ironic in retrospect – setting them aside from the house-music-soaked Hacienda elite.

Born 6 March 1974, Guy Edward John Patrick Garvey was named by his mother after Guy Fawkes. If this strikes a revolutionary streak, then it is further backed by the fact that Guy’s older brother, Marcus, was named after the Jamaican black nationalist Marcus Garvey, whose name also featured in numerous reggae lyrics from the mid-Seventies dub period. Surprisingly, his mother had spent time as a policewoman before having to leave the force when she married. Later, her driven determination to make her own way in life would surface when she attended university, Educating Ritastyle, to gain a psychology degree.

Although not unheard of, even in Bury, switching from running a household to a rather more ambiguous social position as a psychologist was certainly unusual. However, rather like Mark E. Smith and Morrissey, Guy Garvey came from a Lancashire background where working-class values were spiced by intellectualism. The notion that a working-class family from north Manchester would be held by the parameters of the shallow mainstream would not affect the Garvey family. The now, sadly all but lost idea of devouring books for the sake of knowledge and not merely to push through some exam was evident throughout Guy’s childhood. By all accounts his schooling was never interrupted by bouts of apathy or raucous behaviour and he never lost faith in the power of literature.

The centrepiece of the family living room was the book-stacked chimney breast, which offered all manner of intriguing tomes. Various encyclopaedias beckoned and would often be used in sturdy consultation to settle a family debate. Fiction and non-fiction were evenly mixed, with the best old-school novels of the mid-20th century such as Alan Sillitoe’s The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner sharing space with political tomes from esteemed commentators like John Pilger and the best American writers such as Norman Mailer, John Updike and Ken Kesey.

The heart of this literary bent probably came from his father, a proofreader who worked the night shift with Mirror Group Newspapers. He was probably more liberal than such a position might suggest.* During the early Eighties, his trade union stance took him to the picket lines as Thatcher’s grip tightened. Riots at Warrington, during the Stockport Messenger print workers’ battle with Eddie Shah, changed the course of local newspaper production. His support for this was tempered with pangs of guilt as his brother was a policeman. In times of intense polarisation, this would split many families, as Guy Garvey noted in Q, “Thatcher turned the police into her foot soldiers – she literally turned brother against brother. My dad never made it personal and if he had been out fighting with coppers, he would never tell us because he wanted us to respect the police. I suppose I get my sense of civic pride and duty from my dad.”

Guy’s father always brought home both the Daily Mirror, with its legacy of the left, and the opposing Daily Telegraph, which arguably provided the finest news coverage in the country. It wasn’t difficult to pass both tabloid and broadsheet onto the eager Garvey, whose precocious curiosity was evident, according to his elder sister Gina.

“Guy was always soaking things in. Always listening at school. It was obvious he would be an artist of some kind … or a journalist, perhaps.”

Gina was just one of five sisters (along with Samantha, Karen, Louise and Becky) all older than Guy and all with seemingly bohemian tastes in music, clothing and general outlook. Far from the standard Bury household, the prevailing intelligent liberalism could only have had a profound effect. The Garveys’ dinner table also proved an unlikely training ground. Gina remembers “regular and lively discussions about politics, social situations and literature”.

These discussions openly encouraged Guy’s burgeoning intellectualism in a way that didn’t excite him at school. He would often use elongated debates to full effect, grasping the limelight and inadvertently shaping his early stagecraft. “The conversations were not always intense,” said Gina. “They could also be humorous and very funny. They were ‘performances’, no doubt about that now.”

Gina also revealed that these post-dinner chats could be quite cruel. If Guy embarked on a particularly pretentious tack, his talk would be met with shouts of, “Boring … shudupppp!”

“It could be cruel at times,” admitted Gina.

Such exchanges later helped Garvey to pare down his lyricism, keeping his observations interesting and pertinent for people to utilise within their own experience. His parents’ divorce would also prove to be an important factor. Without doubt, Garvey’s writing, which had already started to fill numerous notebooks, would become more and more introspective. More private, one might suggest, with the young boy using words to arrest his discomfort.

“I had always been dramatic as a small child,” he told The Guardian in March 2009. “I remember crying into the mirror when I was about nine or 10 years old. Real amateur dramatics. I am one of seven kids with a big family in a small house, you have got to be dramatic to get noticed.”

There were other problems. Crassly, Garvey’s ‘open-door’ ears would cause him to be bullied at school. It was a pathetic physical problem that was soon arrested by a pin-back operation, although Garvey’s bookish aloofness was also seen as something of an affront to the Bury-boy machismo that has its roots firmly in the Crombie wearing post-mod Suedehead area. While Garvey would later make a lyrical nod to this – as did Morrissey, rather more obviously – he didn’t feel comfortable among schoolboy braggadocio.

Being open to literature, politically aware, and warmly devoted to his family, Garvey also developed rural passions, not surprisingly as the dark Pennine moors rose from the rear of his house. This love of the countryside he would later share with the band that always hovered closest to Elbow, the Wilmslow-based Doves.*

Hunky Dory