image

CONTENTS

Preface

1: How the South Was Lost

America’s Industrial Decline

Riding the Commodity Boom

The Unrequited States of America

Evo’s Sweater

America’s Addiction

Enter the Dragon

Breaking Away

2: Earthquake in the Andes

America Paralyzed

“Death to the Yankees!”

Chávez’s Parrot

South America Plays Chicken

Next Stop: Ecuador

Continental Shifts

3: Atahualpa’s Ghost

The Burden of History

Plunder and Profits

America’s Backyard

Dirty Business

Kennedy, Castro, and Coups

The Washington Consensus

The End of the Experiment

4: Resource Nationalism

Politics Trumps Economics

A South American Tradition

Defying Count Dracula

Economic Xenophobia

Return of the State

5: Trading Oil, Drugs, and Insults

Petro-Diplomacy

Bankrolling Bolivarianism

Coca Crops and Coups

The War on Drugs

Enter Obama

6: Meet the Street

“The Bomb That Only Kills People”

Chávismo’s Foundation Myth

Washington Contentious

The Social License

The Water War

Evo’s Lesson

7: Evo, Evo Presidente!

In the Hands of Indigenous Peoples

The Invisible

“No One Wants to Be a Cholo”

“Give Them the Belt”

The Outsiders Come In

Rewriting Constitutions

8: “For God and Money”

Fujimori, Montesinos, and the Vladivideos

The Pervasiveness of Corruption

Mind the Capability Gap

The Informal Economy

9: Power to the People

Roadblock Culture

The Permanent Threat

The Challenge of Democracy

Community Power

Bypassing Government

The Revolution, Televised

10: Hugonomics

Production Problems

Divide and Rule

Borrowing Public Health

Popularity and Populism

Viva la Revolución

11: The Curious Death of the Panama Hat

Exporting People

Money Isn’t Jobs

Decoupling

Looking beyond Chávez

12: A Different Vision

The War on Drugs

The Cuba Embargo

Immigration

Between Domestic and Foreign Policy

Tomorrow’s Commodities

Democracy, Policing, and Education

The Meaning of America

An American G4

Acknowledgments

Select Bibliography

Index

image

For Lorna

PREFACE

In December 2009, I took a trip from Chicago, where I was the correspondent for the Financial Times, back to Peru, my previous posting for the newspaper. It was not the best of days for the Windy City. The financial crisis had hit hard. The unemployment rate in Chicago exceeded the national average. The city had a $14.5 billion hole in its pension funds and a $650 million budget deficit. On my way to the airport, I drove past apartment complexes half-built and abandoned, haunting reminders of the construction boom that had started to bring buyers back downtown from the suburbs. The Chicago Spire, an ambitious project to build the tallest residential building in the world, on the shore of Lake Michigan, was nothing more than a deserted hole in the ground, having collapsed amid debt, lawsuits, and acrimonious squabbles between the developers. To add insult to injury, two months earlier Chicago had lost its bid to host the 2016 Olympics, which the city had trumpeted as a way to bring investment and development to blighted areas of its south side. Much to the dismay of the assembled crowds watching the voting on giant screens in Daley Plaza, Chicago was eliminated in the first round of voting.

Lima could not have been more different. In many ways it was the same city I had left a couple of years earlier—dirty, chaotic, and sprawling—but where Chicago was struggling, the Peruvian capital was more vibrant than ever. The country had quickly brushed off the global economic downturn, and its economy was growing at a brisk clip. The signs of this activity were everywhere—in the furious shopping, enthusiastic eating, the better quality of cars on the streets, and, most obviously, in the swarms of workers putting up residential buildings at a blistering pace.

I should not have been surprised. The contrast between Lima and Chicago pointed to a much bigger geopolitical trend: Latin America was on the way up and the United States was in relative decline, at least in economic terms. This was nothing like the Great Depression that followed the 1929 Wall Street crash, which had a devastating effect on Latin America. Back then, exports slumped, countries defaulted on their debts, and there was a surge in civil agitation by radical groups; a rash of military coups and attempted coups swept across the region, and a wave of populist nationalism was unleashed. Now Latin America had emerged relatively unscathed from the financial crisis prompted by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the Wall Street investment bank, in September 2008.

In 2010, the economies of Latin America would grow at an average rate of 6 percent—twice as fast as the United States. Paraguay grew at 10 percent, Uruguay and Peru at 9 percent, while the economies of Brazil and Argentina expanded at a rate of 8 percent. Unemployment across the region fell to about 7.6 percent, while joblessness in the United States hovered near 10 percent. The previous year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 19 percent—a welcome advance considering the losses endured in the prior two years—but positively snail-like next to the 104 percent advance in Argentina’s stock exchange, 101 percent growth in the Peruvian bolsa, and 83 percent growth in Brazil. The International Monetary Fund, which had so often in the past warned Latin America that the end was nigh, even started to fret publicly that the region might be growing a little too fast for comfort. The biggest corporate takeover of 2010 was the $28 billion purchase of Carso Global Telecom, a Mexican telecom company, by América Móvil, an even bigger Mexican telecom company. Money managers in Argentina and Peru ran the year’s best-performing emerging markets funds.

While Peru was a remarkable story, the headline-stealing star of Latin America was Brazil. It had been the last country to enter the Great Recession that began in 2008 and the first to leave it. It was poised to overtake France and the United Kingdom to become the world’s fifth biggest economy. It was the world’s biggest producer of iron ore, and the top global exporter of beef, chicken, orange juice, sugar, coffee, and tobacco. Its companies were transforming themselves into global titans. Vale, headquartered in Rio, was the world’s second biggest mining company. Gerdau, based in Porto Alegre, was the leading producer of long steel—used in construction and infrastructure—in the Americas, with operations across Latin America as well as in the United States, Canada, India, and Spain. Embraer of São José dos Campos was the world’s third biggest aircraft maker. BM&FBovespa of São Paulo had become the second biggest financial exchange in the world. In September 2010, Petrobras, the state oil company, conducted the biggest stock sale in financial history, raising $67 billion from eager investors. Eike Batista, a mining and oil baron once married to a Playboy cover girl, was by 2010 the eighth richest person in the world, with a net worth of $27 billion, according to Forbes. Batista predicted that he would soon be the world’s wealthiest man, an ambition that would see him replacing another Latin American—Carlos Slim, the Mexican telephone tycoon.

Back in the United States, not only was economic growth sluggish, but the world was also growing increasingly concerned about the country’s debt burden. The national debt was nearly $14 trillion—close to the US gross domestic product. The United States showed little stomach for tackling the problem. In 2010, after a bipartisan commission recommended slashing the federal budget, President Barack Obama instead agreed to an $858 billion deal with Republicans to extend the tax cuts put in place under his predecessor, George W. Bush. The following year, the federal government flirted with default because of a political stand-off over how to raise the country’s debt limit. The United States was looking like a country devoid of a long-term plan, putting off the inevitable as long as possible, engaging in the same sort of unsustainable fiscal irresponsibility of which it had long accused other countries—especially those in Latin America.

With the economies of South America growing so fast, you might have thought the United States would be looking to catch a little of the action, to shackle the stuttering engine of its economic growth to the supercharged developing countries of the south. US corporations had long cottoned on to what was happening. Latin America accounted for one-quarter of US exports. While North America continued to grow anemically, the United States’ leading companies funneled investment into countries such as Brazil, where demand was growing much faster. The US government was much slower on the uptake.

For decades, Washington had been lecturing to Latin America how to behave. It had told the region to cut the size of government, to set business free, to lower taxes and burdensome regulation, to open itself up to foreign trade.

In the aftermath of the 2008 recession, not only did the wisdom of that advice look questionable, but the United States was increasingly doing just what it had cautioned Latin American countries not to do. The lack of federal oversight was being blamed for having enabled the financial crisis. George W. Bush, a tax-cutting Republican president, had overseen a vast increase in the national debt. Whereas his predecessor, Bill Clinton, had declared back in 1996 that “the era of big government is over,” the financial crisis and subsequent economic downturn had forced the federal government to throw itself back into the US economy, injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into Wall Street, Detroit, and the national mortgage market. Barack Obama set a decidedly protectionist tone by inserting a “buy American” clause into his $787 billion stimulus package of 2009.

Meanwhile, the biggest Latin American countries were paying off their debts and expanding their ties with the world’s fastest-growing and most exciting market—China. Instead of schooling its southern neighbors, it was starting to look as if the United States might actually have something to learn from them.

As Latin America’s economic might grew, the region was considering what its future role might be in the new geopolitical order. Brazil was starting to flex its muscles on the international stage, showing diplomatic as well as economic ambition. Other South American countries were also extending their international reach. Might that present an opportunity for the United States to engage in some strategic alliance building, to find a new international role as part of a hemispheric coalition that could collectively formulate a vision for the whole of the Americas and a vision of North America’s and Latin America’s joint role in the world?