img

Contents

img

In Memoriam
DONOVAN F. MITCHELL
AND
IRENE K. MITCHELL

Foreword to the Eighth Edition

Sadly, this is the first edition of The Guide in which Bruce Mitchell, who died in January 2010, has had no part. After Mitchell’s death Fred Robinson was invited by the editors of Blackwell Publishing to prepare an eighth revised edition.

In preparing this edition I have made a complete review of all parts of the book with an eye to clarifying and sharpening our phrasing and updating the contents in all discussions of both grammar and texts. In addition, two new features have been added: the first twenty-five lines of Beowulf have been introduced to the selections from that poem (text number 18), and these lines have been provided with an exceptionally detailed commentary dealing with the language, style, and content of the poem. This addition has been made in response to readers’ request that The Guide provide students with a full and detailed introduction to the poem that in most colleges and universities is taken up in a course following the introductory course in Old English. A second addition is Appendix F, which provides a brief but fairly comprehensive account of the First Consonant Shift (‘Grimm’s and Verner’s Laws’) to which we make allusion in §§105–109 but without spelling out just what these consonant shifts were.

A special feature of The Guide ever since the First Edition has been the detailed explanation of OE syntax (§§139–214). Occasional reference is made elsewhere in The Guide to specific passages in the discussion of syntax, and these passages should be helpful to students. But most teachers do not assign the entire fifty-odd pages on syntax to beginning students, these pages being directed to the more advanced student of OE. To the more advanced student and to Old English scholars in general the discussion of syntax can be quite useful, and so I am retaining it in this edition.

In preparing this Eighth Edition I have received valuable advice and assistance from several colleagues, including Traugott Lawler, Roberta Frank, J. R. Hall, and Theodore Leinbaugh. I am most grateful for their help. Eight anonymous readers enlisted by the publisher have also provided very helpful insights and suggestions. And, as always, I am indebted to Alfred Bammesberger for his brilliant textual studies.

img

Anglo-Saxon England

Abbreviations and Symbols

LANGUAGES AND DIALECTS

img

GRAMMATICAL TERMS

img

SYMBOLS

>

became

<

came from

*

this precedes a form which is not recorded. Usually it is a form which probably once existed and which scholars reconstruct to explain the stages in sound-changes; see §103.3.

  Sometimes it is a form which certainly never existed but which is invented to show that one sound-change preceded another. An exam-ple is ċierfan in §100, note.

over a letter denotes a long vowel or diphthong.

img

over a letter denotes a short vowel or diphthong.

img

means ‘short and long’, e.g. img in §100.

img

in §41 denote a long and short syllable respectively.

img

denote respectively a syllable carrying full, secondary, or no, stress.

[ ]

enclose phonetic symbols.

How to Use this Guide

This section is particularly addressed to those of you who are working without a teacher.

THE IMPORTANCE OF READING AND PARSING

The ability to recognize forms in the texts you are reading and an awareness of the basic structure of Old English are far more important than a parrot knowledge of the paradigms. Hence, from the beginning, you must get into the habit of analysing and thoroughly understanding each form you meet in your texts.

Important in the reading of OE is ‘parsing’—that is, identifying what part of speech each word in a sentence is (noun, pronoun, adjective, verb, and so on) and what particular form the word has in the sentence (accusative case, present tense, subjunctive mood, and so on). If you are uncertain about the meaning of the parts of speech listed below or of other terms such as ‘article’, ‘infinitive’, or ‘participle’, you are advised to consult Appendix D. For further details see A. J. Thomson and A. V. Martinet A Practical English Grammar (4th ed., Oxford, 1986) or David Crystal A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (2nd ed., Basil Blackwell, 1985).

The information needed when parsing Old English words is:

Noun:

Meaning, gender, number, case, and the reason for the case, e.g. accusative because it is object, genitive denoting possession, or dative of the indirect object.

Pronoun:

Same as for noun. Here you need to know the noun to which the pronoun refers. (If it is a relative pronoun, see §162.)

Adjective:

Same as for noun. Sometimes, of course, an adjective is used with a noun, sometimes it is used alone, either as a complement or where a noun is more usual, e.g. ‘The good die young’.

Verb:

If you have the infinitive, you merely need the meaning. Otherwise you need to work out the person, number, tense, and mood, and then deduce the infinitive. Unless you are familiar with the verb, you will have to do all this before you can find its meaning. For hints on how to do it, see §134.

Adverbs and interjections (a name given to words like ‘Oh!’, ‘Alas!’, and ‘Lo!’) will give little trouble. It is important to notice the case of a word governed by a preposition, for a difference in case sometimes indicates a difference in meaning; see §§213–214. Conjunctions are a greater source of difficulty. Lists of them are given in §§168, 171, and 184, and references to discussions on them are set out in ‘Understanding the Syntax’ below.

Note

The importance of gender varies. Sometimes it is obvious, sometimes it is of no real importance. But at times it provides a vital clue. Thus in Hē ġehīerþ þās word and þā wyrcð, þās and þā could be acc. sg. fem. or acc. pl. Only the fact that word is neuter will tell us that we must translate ‘He hears these words and carries them out’.

LENGTH MARKS

Long vowels have been marked ( - ) throughout, with the exception noted below. A knowledge of the length of vowels (or ‘quantity’, as it is called) is essential for proficiency in reading, for accuracy in translation (compare god ‘god’ with gōd ‘good’), for the understanding of OE metre, and for the serious study of phonology. Hence, when you learn the inflexions, you will need to remember both the form of the word and the length of its vowels. Long vowels are marked in the Texts and you should take advantage of this by noting carefully those which occur in both familiar and unfamiliar words.

But since the length-marks are not shown in the Old English manuscripts, many editions of prose and verse texts do not show them. Examples are the standard editions of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and of the Homilies of Ælfric and Wulfstan, the texts published by Methuen (in their Old English Library) and by the Early English Text Society, and The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records (published by Columbia University Press), which contain virtually all the extant poetry. You will have to use one or more of these works fairly early in your career. In the hope that you will find the transition to such texts easier if you have already seen short passages in the form in which they appear in these works, we have not regularized the spelling (see §3) or marked vowel-length in the illustrative quotations in chapters 5 and 6. Most of the passages quoted are taken from texts which appear in Part Two. You can use these passages by writing them out, marking in the length-marks yourself, and then comparing them with the correct version. You can check individual words in the Glossary. But you will find it more interesting if you track down the context of the longer prose passages and those in verse with the help of the references in the Glossary. By so doing, you will improve your knowledge of vowel quantity and widen your acquaintance with OE literature.

LEARNING THE INFLEXIONS

Those who want to test their knowledge of the paradigms and to try their hand at translating into Old English (a very useful way of learning the language, especially important since no one speaks it today) will find A. S. Cook Exercises in Old English (Ginn, 1895) a useful book. There are second-hand copies about. Stephen Pollington’s Wordcraft, Wordhoard and Wordlists: Concise New English to Old English Dictionary and Thesaurus (Anglo-Saxon Books, 1996) will give easy access to the Old English vocabulary.

We suggest that those coming to this book without any knowledge of Old English learn the inflexions in the order set out below. But remember that texts must be read and an understanding of the syntax acquired at the same time. Hints on how to do this are given later in this section.

1 Read §§1–4.

2 Now work through §§5–9. Make sure that you can recognize the new letters æ, þ, and ð, and practise reading aloud the Practice Sentences (Text 1), following generally the natural stress of MnE.

3 Now read §§10–12.

4 The next step is to learn the paradigms in A below, in the order in which they are set out there.

5 (a) When you have learnt the pronouns, nouns, and adjectives, in A, you can see whether §§77–81 help or hinder you. Experience on this point differs.

(b) When you have learnt the verbs in A, you should read §§131–134.

6 You can now turn to the paradigms referred to in B below. B contains what may be called the ‘derived paradigms’, i.e. those which can be derived from the paradigms set out in A when certain sound-changes are understood. The sound-changes are presented in the hope that they will make your work easier, not as an end in themselves. Thus, if you meet a word hwatum in your reading, you will not be able to find out its meaning unless you know that it comes from an adjective hwæt ‘active, bold’. You will know this only if you have read §70.

7 The paradigms in C are important ones of fairly frequent occurrence which need not be learnt all at once. When you come across one of them in your reading, you can consult the relevant section. In this way, you will absorb them as need arises.

8 Because of the dialectal variations and inconsistencies in spelling noted in §§2–3, there are many ways of spelling even some of the most common words in the language; for examples, see the word se in the Glossary. If all the possible forms of this and other words were given in the paradigms in chapter 3, you would not see the wood for the trees. So those less common variants which occur in the texts will be found as cross-references in the Glossary.

A Key Paradigms

These paradigms must be known thoroughly. At this stage, concentrate on them alone; disregard anything else in these sections.

1 The pronouns set out in §§15–21. Note particularly §19. (The dual forms in §21 may be passed over at first.)

2 Nama (§22) and, after reading §§63–64, tila (§65).

3 Now read §§26–32.

4 Stān (§33), scip/word (§34), and ġiefu/lār (§§47–48).

5 The strong declension of the adjectives (§§66–67).

6 Now read §§14, 87–89, and 115.

7 Fremman (§§116–117) and lufian (§§124–125).

8 Habban (§126), bēon (§127), and weorþan (Appendix A.3 (b)).

9 The principal parts of the strong verbs (§§90–95).

10 The conjugation of strong verbs (§§110–113).

B Derived Paradigms

The paradigms in this group may be derived from those in A as follows:

1 From nama, those in §§23–25.

2 From stān, scip, or ġiefu, those in §§35–44, 48–51, and 52–60. See now §13.

3 From tila and til, those in §§68–73.

4 From fremman, those in §§116–123.

5 From lufian, those in §§124–125.

6 From §§90–95, those in §§96–109.

7 From §§110–113, those in §114.

Note

Some nouns which often go like stān, scip, or ġiefu, once belonged to other declensions. As a result, they sometimes have unusual forms which may cause you difficulty in your reading. It might be just as well if you learnt to recognize these fairly early in your career. They include: ċild (§34), hæleþ and mōnaþ (§44), some nouns in -e (§§45–46), the feminine nouns discussed in §§49 and 51, the relationship nouns (§60), and the u-nouns (§§61–62).

C Other Paradigms

1 Other Strong Nouns (§§45–46 and 61–62).

2 Comparison of Adjectives (§§74–76).

3 Numerals (§§82–86).

4 Verbs

(a) Class 3 weak verbs (§126).

(b) Dōn and gān (§128).

(c) Willan (§§129 and 211).

(d) Preterite-present verbs (§§130 and 206–210).

5 Adverbs (§135).

LEARNING THE VOCABULARY

Many OE words are easily recognizable from their MnE counterparts, though sometimes the meaning may be different; see §4 and Part 2.1 below (i.e. the first OE text for practice reading) and look up the word ‘lewd’ in the Oxford English Dictionary.

Other words differ in spelling and pronunciation as a result of changes in ME and MnE. The short vowels e, i, o, u, have remained relatively constant (see §7). But the long vowels and the diphthongs have sometimes changed considerably. Words with a long vowel in OE sometimes appear in MnE with the vowel doubled, e.g. fēt (masc. pl.) ‘feet’ and dōm (masc.) ‘doom’. Sometimes, they have -e at the end, e.g. līf (neut.) ‘life’ and (with, in addition, one of the differences discussed below) hām (masc.) ‘home’ and hūs (neut.) ‘house’.

Correspondences like the last two are more difficult to spot. Yet a knowledge of them is easily acquired and will save you much hard work. Thus, if you know that OE ā often appears in MnE as oa, you will not need to use the Glossary to discover that bār (masc.) means ‘boar’, bāt (fem. or masc.) ‘boat’, brād ‘broad’, and hār ‘hoar(y)’. Words like āc (fem.) ‘oak’, hlāf (masc.) ‘loaf’, and hlāfas (masc. pl.) ‘loaves’, will not present much more difficulty.

The table which follows will help you to recognize more of these correspondences. But it is not complete and the correspondences do not always apply. Thus OE hāt is MnE ‘hot’ and you may find it interesting to look up in a glossary or dictionary the four OE words spelt ār and see what has happened to them.

img

See §253 (Barney) for a book which may help you to learn the vocabulary.

The principles on which words were formed in OE are set out in §§136– 138. Once you understand these, you will be able to deduce the meaning of some new words by their similarity to words you already know; see §136. For correspondences in endings, see §138.

UNDERSTANDING THE SYNTAX

The fundamental differences between the syntax of Old English and that of Modern English are set out in §§139–153. These, and §§182–183, should be studied as soon as you can read simple sentences with some degree of fluency and before you pass on to the connected passages of Old English recommended below. Other sections which should be read fairly soon are §§154–155, 157–158, and 160 (noun clauses and their conjunctions), §162 (relative pronouns), §§166–167 and §§169–170 (conjunctions introducing adverb clauses), §189 note, and §§195–199 (the uses of the tenses and the syntax of the resolved verb forms).

The remaining parts of the syntax should be used for reference when the need arises; note especially the topics mentioned in §§141–142 and the lists of conjunctions in §§168, 171, and 184. When you begin to feel some confidence, you can try the exercise in §172.

If at first you find these sections too long and complicated, you are advised to use one of the books cited in §256.

TEXTS TO READ

Part Two of this book starts with a selection of prose texts for beginners, the texts being carefully coordinated with the explanations in the grammar sections. After you have worked your way through these, you will be ready for the poems, which are similarly annotated. This combination of texts should provide a foundation from which you can advance to Beowulf and to the prose and verse texts available in Methuen’s Old English Library and the Manchester Series.

READING THE TEXTS

Before beginning to read the texts you should do two things: first, study carefully the introduction to the Glossary, and second, familiarize yourself with the function words and word-patterns listed in §§168 and 171. While reading the texts, you should make careful use not only of the Glossary, but also of the Index of Words and Appendix D.

WES ÞU HAL

It now remains for us to wish you success – and pleasure – in your studies. In 991, before the battle of Maldon, Byrhtnoth called across the cold waters of the river to his Danish foes:

Nū ēow is gerimgmed;  gāð ricene tō ūs,

Guman tō gūþe;  god āna wāt

hwā þǣre wælstōwe  wealdan nōte.

(The Battle of Maldon, ll. 93–95)

This can be paraphrased

‘Now the way is clear for you; O warriors,

hasten to the battle; God alone knows

how things will turn out’.

It is our hope and wish that your efforts will prosper – Wel þe þæs geweorces!

Part One

1
Preliminary Remarks on the Language

§1  Old English (OE) is the vernacular Germanic language of Great Britain as it is recorded in manuscripts and inscriptions dating from before about 1100. It is one of the Germanic group of the Indo-European family of languages. Those who are unfamiliar with this concept should read about it in one of the histories of the English language cited in the Bibliography.

§2  There are four dialects distinguishable in the extant monuments – Northumbrian, Mercian, Kentish, West-Saxon. The differences are apparent in the spelling and vocabulary. After 900 West-Saxon was increasingly used as a standard written language. It is for this reason that, initially at any rate, you learn West-Saxon. But even here the spelling conventions were never as rigidly observed as they are in Great Britain or America today, where compositors, typists, and writers, in different parts of the country use the same spelling, no matter how different their pronunciations may be.

§3  Most OE primers therefore attempt to make things easier for the beginner by ‘normalizing’, i.e. regularizing, the spelling by eliminating all forms not belonging to the West-Saxon dialect. But difficulty arises because two stages can be distinguished – early West-Saxon (eWS), which is the language of the time of King Alfred (c. 900), and late West-Saxon (lWS), which is seen in the works of Ælfric (c. 1000). Norman Davis, in revising Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Primer, followed Sweet and used eWS as his basis. Quirk and Wrenn’s Old English Grammar, however, normalizes on the basis of Ælfric’s lWS. For the beginner, the most important difference is that eWS ie and īe appear in lWS texts as y and ȳ; this accounts for such differences as Sweet ieldra, hīeran, but Q. & W. yldra, hȳran. Another is that ea and ēa may be spelt e and ē in lWS (and sometimes in eWS) texts, e.g. seah and scēap, but seh and scēp. Since the other differences will scarcely trouble you and since there are some disadvantages in the use of lWS, the paradigms are given here in their eWS forms and the sound laws are discussed with eWS as the basis. Any important variations likely to cause difficulty – apart from those mentioned here – will be noted. Full lists of all dialectal variants will be found in the appropriate section of Alistair Campbell’s Old English Grammar.

In the sections on syntax, the spelling of a standard edition has generally been followed, though occasionally an unusual form has been silently regularized. This should ease the transition to non-normalized texts. Similarly, in the prose texts provided for reading, we have moved from totally normalized to non-normalized texts. We have not normalized the poems.

§4  As has been explained in the Foreword, this book, after a brief discussion of orthography and pronunciation, deals with accidence, word formation, and syntax (including word-order), and attempts simple explanations of those sound-changes which will help you to learn the inflexions. Other sound-changes and semantics are not discussed. On the metre of poetry see Appendix C. It is important, however, to remember that many common words have changed their meaning. Sellan means ‘to give’, not just ‘to give in exchange for money, to sell’. Eorl cannot always be translated ‘earl’ and dēor and fugol mean, not ‘deer’ and ‘fowl’, but ‘any (wild) animal’ and ‘any bird’ respectively. It is also important to note that, while Old English literature was written and/or transmitted by Christians, the Christian poetry was largely written in an originally pagan vocabulary which embodied the values of the heroic code. However, it does not follow that the poetry is rich in pagan elements. You will find that words like lof in The Seafarer and wyrd in The Wanderer have acquired Christian connotations. On this point, see further §§218 and 236–246. The Bibliography contains references to useful introductory discussions on all the topics not discussed in this book.

2
Orthography and Pronunciation

I ORTHOGRAPHY

§5 As a glance at the facsimile of the OE manuscript on page 278 will show, the letters used by Anglo-Saxon scribes were sometimes very like and sometimes very unlike those used today, both in shape and function. Printers of Anglo-Saxon texts generally use the equivalent modern letter form. Hence the sounds [f] and [v] are both represented by f, and the sounds [s] and [z] by s because the distinctions were less significant in OE; on these and other differences in representing the consonants, see §9.

The following symbols are not in use today: æ (ash), which represents the vowel in MnE ‘hat’, þ (thorn) and ð (eth or, as the Anglo-Saxons appear to have called it, ðæt), both of which represent MnE th as in ‘cloth’ and in ‘clothe’. Capital ð is written Đ. To make the learning of paradigms as simple as possible, þ has been used throughout chapter 3.

The early texts of the Methuen Old English Library used the runic ‘wynn’ ρ instead of w and the OE letter ʒ for g. In the latest volumes, these have been discarded.

As is customary, the punctuation in quotations and selections from OE is modern. See the facsimiles on pages 278 and 293 and note the absence of modern punctuation.

II STRESS

§6 The stress usually falls on the first syllable, as in MnE, e.g. mórgen ‘morning’. The prefix ġe- is always unaccented; hence ġebimgdan ‘await, abide’. Two main difficulties occur:

1 Prepositional prefixes, e.g. for-, ofer-, can be either accented (usually in nouns or adjectives, e.g. fórwyrd ‘ruin’) or unaccented (usually in verbs, e.g. forwíernan ‘refúse’).

2 Compound words in which both elements retain their full meaning, e.g. sæ-weall ‘sea-wall’, have a secondary stress on the root syllable of the second element. There is some dispute about three-syllabled words with a long first syllable (see §26). Some say that bindende ‘binding’ and timbrode ‘built’ have a pattern like MnE ‘manhandle’, not like img. But not everyone agrees.

III VOWELS

§7 Short vowels must be distinguished from long vowels, which are marked (-) in this book (except as noted on pp. 2–3). Approximate pronunciations of OE vowels for those working without a teacher are given as far as possible in terms of Received Standard English.

a

as the first vowel in ‘aha’

ā

as the second vowel in ‘aha’

æ

as in ‘mat’

ǣ

as in ‘bad’

e

as in ‘bet’

ē

approx. as in ‘hate’, but a pure vowel [cf. German See]

i

as in ‘tin’

ī

as in ‘seen’

o

as in ‘cough’

ō

approx. as in ‘so’, but a pure vowel [cf. German so]

u

as in ‘pull’ [NOT ‘hut’]

ū

as in ‘cool’

y

as i, with lips in a whistling position [French tu]

ȳ

as ī, with lips in a whistling position [French ruse]

Vowels in unstressed syllables should be pronounced clearly. Failure to distinguish gen. sg. eorles from nom. acc. pl. eorlas is characteristic of ME, not of OE.

IV DIPHTHONGS

§8 If you are not sure of the distinction between vowels and diphthongs, see the definition and examples under ‘diphthong’ in Appendix D below. It is important to realize that OE words such as heall, hēold, hielt, which contain diphthongs, are just as much monosyllables as MnE ‘meat’ and ‘field’ (in which two letters represent one vowel) or MnE ‘fine’ and ‘base’, which contain diphthongs. The OE diphthongs, with approximate pronunciations, are

ea = æ + a
ēa = ǣ + a
eo = e + o
ēo= ē + o
ie = i + e
īe = ī + e

A short diphthong is equal in length to a short vowel, a long diphthong to a long vowel. But remember that, like the MnE word ‘cow’, they are diphthongs, not two distinct vowels such as we get in the ea of ‘Leander’.

V CONSONANTS

§9 All consonants must be pronounced, e.g. c in cnapa, g in gnæt, h in hlāf, r in þǣr, and w in wrītan.

Double consonants must be pronounced double or long. Thus, when you see -dd-, as in biddan, pronounce it as you do when you say ‘red D’, not as you do when you say ‘ready’.

Most of the consonants are pronounced in the same way as in MnE. The main exceptions are set out below.

The letters s, f, þ, and ð, are pronounced voiced, i.e. like MnE z, v, and th in ‘clothe’, between vowels or other voiced sounds, e.g. rīsan, hlāfas, paþas, and hēafdes. In other positions, including the beginning and end of words, they are voiceless, i.e. like MnE s, f, and th in ‘cloth’, e.g. sittan, hlāf, pæþ, and oft. This accounts for the different sounds in MnE ‘path’ but ‘paths’, ‘loaf’ but ‘loaves’, and the like. Initial ġe- does not cause voicing; findan and its past ptc. ġe-funden both have the sound f.

The differences described in the preceding paragraph are due to the fact that the pairs f and v, s and z, and voiceless and voiced þ ‘th’, were merely variants (‘allophones’) in OE and not sounds of different significance (‘phonemes’). This means that, whereas in MnE speech the distinctions between ‘fat’ and ‘vat’, ‘sink’ and ‘zinc’, and ‘loath’ and ‘loathe’, depend on whether we use a voiceless or voiced sound, both OE fæt ‘fat’ and OE fæt ‘vat’ could be pronounced with initial f or v, according to dialect.

At the beginning of a word (‘initially’) before a vowel, h is pronounced as in MnE ‘hound’. Otherwise it is like German ch in ich [ç] or ach [x], according to the front or back quality of the neighbouring vowel. It can be pronounced like ch in Scots loch.

Before a, o, u, and y, c is pronounced k and g is pronounced as in MnE ‘good’. Before e and i, c is usually pronounced like ch in MnE ‘child’ and g like y in MnE ‘yet’. In Part One and in reading selections 1 through 3, the latter are printed ċ and ġ respectively, except in the examples quoted in chapters 5 and 6. ċċ in words like wiċċecræft is pronounced like modern ch.

After or between back vowels, g is pronounced [img], like the g sometimes heard in dialectal German sagen. Those without a teacher can pronounce it as w in words like dragan and boga.

The combinations sc and cg are usually pronounced like MnE sh and dge respectively. Thus scip ‘ship’ and ecg ‘edge’ are pronounced the same in both OE and MnE. But in ascian ‘ask’, -sc- is pronounced -sk-.

Note

A detailed account of the pronunciation of Old English will be found in chapters VI–IX of Alistair Campbell’s Old English Grammar.

If you experiment, you will notice that the vowel in ‘bad’ is longer than that in ‘mat’, though MnE [æ] is frequently described as a ‘short vowel’.

The original pronunciation of ie and īe is not known with any certainty. It is simplest and most convenient for our purposes to assume that they represented diphthongs as explained above. But by King Alfred’s time ie was pronounced as a simple vowel (monophthong), probably a vowel some-where between i and e; ie is often replaced by i or y, and unstressed i is often replaced by ie, as in hiene for hine. Probably īe had a similar sound.