cover

Contents

Andreas Herrmann

Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler

Patrizia Rubiolo, Barbara Sgorbini, Erica Liberto, Chiara Cordero and Carlo Bicchi

André Kessler and Kimberly Morrell

Kenji Mori

J. Richard M. Thacker and Margaret R. Train

Anthony A. Birkbeck

Meriel G. Jones

Christoph Cerny

Alan Gelperin

Christophe Laudamiel

Youngjae Byun, Young Teck Kim, Kashappa Goud H. Desai and Hyun Jin Park

Andreas Herrmann

Russell K. Monson

Image

Foreword

Volatile compounds play an important role in nature as messenger compounds to transmit selective information between species. The ubiquity of these compounds in our everyday environment has initiated a variety of research activities in the life sciences over recent decades. Both biologists and chemists became interested in exploring the role of bioactive volatile compounds in many different aspects. The evolution from molecular to supramo- lecular science has particularly influenced the research activities on the chemistry and biology of volatiles. The investigation of molecular properties beyond the single molecule required (and resulted in) numerous interdisciplinary efforts to answer important questions related to the role of these compounds in our direct environment.

Molecular recognition is one of the key aspects leading to the understanding of the biological processes involved in volatile signalling. In contrast to the investigation of host–guest interactions typically encountered in the area of pharmaceutical or biomedical research, which usually take place in aqueous solution, volatile compounds have to be diffused into the air and transported over large distances to reach their biological target. The specific feature of their volatility, as compared to other bioactive molecules, characterizes the behaviour of these molecules from their biogeneration, to their emission, analysis, release, transport, recognition and perception, up to their degradation in a specific environment.

The present book summarizes several aspects related to the chemistry and biology of volatile compounds in a structure-based approach and tries to give the reader an introduction to and general overview of the various research areas related to this particular class of molecules. It also provides perspectives along novel avenues of research and development. It should thus be of great interest to all those involved in the various facets of both basic and applied research on volatile compounds.

Jean-Marie Lehn

Strasbourg

November 2009

List of Contributors

Carlo Bicchi, Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy

Anthony A. Birkbeck, Firmenich SA, Division Recherche et Développement, 1 Route des Jeunes, B. P. 239, 1211 Genève 8, Switzerland

Youngjae Byun, Department of Packaging Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634–0320, USA

Christoph Cerny, Firmenich SA, Division Recherche et Développement, 7 Rue de la Bergère, B. P. 148, 1217 Meyrin 2, Switzerland

Chiara Cordero, Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy

Kashappa Goud H. Desai, Department of Food Technology, 306 School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, 136–701, Korea

Alan Gelperin, Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Andreas Herrmann, Firmenich SA, Division Recherche et Développement, 1 Route des Jeunes, B. P. 239, 1211 Genève 8, Switzerland

Meriel G. Jones, The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK

André Kessler, Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, E445 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Young Teck Kim, Department of Packaging Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634–0320, USA

Christophe Laudamiel, DreamAir LLC, 210 Eleventh Ave, Suite 1002, New York, NY 10001, USA

Erica Liberto, Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy

Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler, Botanisches Institut (Molecular Biology and Biochemistry of Plants), University of Karlsruhe, Kaiserstraβe 12, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany

Russell K. Monson, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA

Kenji Mori, The University of Tokyo, 1–20-6-1309, Mukogaoka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113- 0023, Japan

Kimberly Morrell, Cornell University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, E445 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Hyun Jin Park, Department of Food Technology, 306 School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, 136–701, Korea

Patrizia Rubiolo, Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy

Barbara Sgorbini, Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy

J. Richard M. Thacker, Biological Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK

Margaret R. Train, Biological Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK

Acknowledgements

First, I would like to thank Paul Deards from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd in Chichester for his invitation to edit this book; without his initiative, this project would not have been realized. Furthermore, I wish to thank Richard Davies, Gemma Valler, Rebecca Ralf and Mohan Tamilmaran, all from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, for their continuous support during the entire publishing process.

Of course, particular thanks go to all of the authors for accepting the challenge to provide an overview of their research areas, for their enthusiasm and many stimulating discussions and exchanges during the editing process, as well as to Prof. Jean-Marie Lehn for agreeing to write a foreword to this book. As all the chapters were peer-reviewed, I would also like to thank the numerous referees for their suggestions and comments, which helped to improve the quality of the manuscripts.

Finally, I thank my superiors Dr. Daniel Benczédi, Dr. Maria-Inés Velazco and Dr. Antoine Gautier from Firmenich for supporting this project, and I thank my wife Anja for her patience. I hope this book provides an interesting and stimulating interdisciplinary approach to the chemistry and biology of volatile compounds, and that the readers forgive the errors that may have escaped the proofreading.

Andreas Herrmann
Genève
January 2010

Abbreviations

Acacetyl (in structural formula)
ACC1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
ACSAmerican Chemical Society
ACSOS-allyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide
AEaroma extract
AEDAaroma extract dilution analysis
AFNORAssociation Française de Normalisation
AMDISautomatic mass spectral deconvolution
AMPIacetylmethyl phosphinate
APCanterior piriform cortex
approx.approximatively
APSadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate
aq.aqueous
ASEaccelerated solvent extraction
ASESaerosol solvent extraction system
ATPadenosine-5′-triphosphate
BASFBadische Anilin und Soda Fabrik
BINAP2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyl
BOLDblood oxygenation level dependent
BOSSbeaver dam offspring study
Bubutyl (in structural formula)
BVOCbiogenic volatile organic compound
ca.circa
cAMPcyclic adenosine monophosphate
CAN-BDcarbon dioxide assisted nebulization with a bubble dryer
CARcarboxen
cat.catalyst/catalytic
CBFcerebral blood flow
CDcircular dichroism (spectroscopy)
CDscyclodextrins
CDPcytidine-5′-diphosphate
CDP-ME4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol
CDP-ME2P4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2-phosphate
CDP-MEPdiphosphocytidyl-2-methyl-D-erythritol-2-phosphate
C-GCconventional gas chromatography
CICriegee intermediate
CI-MSchemical ionization–mass spectrometry
CITACCooperation on International Traceability in Analytical Chemistry
CITESConvention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
CoAcoenzyme A
COBELchildren’s olfactory behaviors in everyday life
conc.concentrated
COSYcorrelation spectroscopy
Cpcyclopentadienyl
CPCSPcontinuous powder coating spraying process
CRCChemical Rubber Company
CScysteine synthase
CSOalk(en)ylcysteine sulfoxide
CTPcytidine-5′-triphosphate
1Done-dimensional
2Dtwo-dimensional
3Dthree-dimensional
DADSdiallyl disulfide
DCdirect contact
DCMUdiuron
DEETN, N-diethyl-2-toluamide
DELOSdepressurization of an expanded liquid organic solution
d.f.film thickness
D-HSdynamic headspace
DIBAL-Hdiisobutylaluminium hydride
dil.diluted
DMAPP3,3-dimethylallyl diphosphate
DMSOdimethylsulfoxide
DNAdeoxyribonucleic acid
DOX1-deoxy-D-xylulose
DOXP1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate
DPdual phase
DSCdifferential scanning calorimetry
DTBPdi-tert-butyl peroxide
DVBdivinylbenzene
DXRDOXP reductoisomerase
DXSDOXP synthase
EADelectroantennographic detection
EAGelectroantennogram
Ed.editor/edition
EDGARemissions database for global atmospheric research
eeenantiomeric excess
EEGelectroencephalogram
EHLSepidemiology of hearing loss study
EOessential oil
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (USA)
erenantiomeric ratio
ES-GCenantioselective gas chromatography
ESPepithiospecifier protein
ETethylene
Etethyl (in structural formula)
etc.et cetera
EUEuropean Union
FACsfatty acid–amino acid conjugates
FAOFood and Agriculture Organisation (of the United Nations)
Fdferredoxin
FFNSCflavour and fragrance natural and synthetic compounds
F-GCfast gas chromatography
FIDflame ionization detector
fMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imaging
FPPfarnesyl diphosphate
FQPAFood Quality Protection Act (USA)
FSOTfused silica open tubular
GA-3-Pglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
GASgas (or supercritical fluids) anti-solvent
GCgas chromatography
GC-FIDgas chromatography–flame ionization detection
GC-MSgas chromatography–mass spectrometry
GC-qMSgas chromatography–quadrupole mass spectrometry
GC-Ogas chromatography–olfactometry
GGPPgeranylgeranyl diphosphate
γGPγ-glutamyl sulfoxide peptide derivative
GPPgeranyl diphosphate
GSglucosinolate
GSHreduced glutathione
GSSGoxidised glutathione disulfide
HCC-HShigh concentration capacity headspace technique
HIPVsherbivore-induced plant volatiles
HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus
HLAhuman leukocyte antigen
HMBCheteronuclear multiple bond coherence
HMBPP4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl diphosphate
HMGhydroxyl-methylglutaryl
HMPAhexamethylphosphoramide
HMQCheteronuclear multiple quantum coherence
HPChydroxypropyl cellulose
HPLChigh performance liquid chromatography
HPODhydroperoxyoctadienoate
HRheart rate
HSheadspace
HS-LPMEheadspace–liquid phase microextraction
HS-MSheadspace–mass spectrometry
HSQCheteronuclear single quantum coherence
HSSEheadspace sorptive extraction
HS-SPDEheadspace–solid phase dynamic extraction
HS-SPMEheadspace–solid phase microextarction
HS-SMSEheadspace–silicon membrane sorptive extraction
HS-STEheadspace–sorptive tape extraction
IAAindole-3-acetic acid
IATAInternational Air Transport Association
i.d.inner diameter
IFFInternational Flavors and Fragrances Inc.
IFRAInternational Fragrance Association
INCATinside needle capillary adsorption trap
IOFIInternational Organization of the Flavour Industry
IPPisopentenyl diphosphate
IRMSisotope ratio mass spectrometry
IspDCDP-ME synthase
IspECDP-ME kinase
IspFMEcPP synthase
IspGHMBPP synthase
IspHHMBPP reductase
ISTDinternal standard
IUPACInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
JAjasmonic acid
LCliquid chromatography
LDAlithium diisopropylamine
LFlachrymatory factor
LFSlachrymatory factor synthase
LMCSlongitudinally modulated cryogenic system
LODlimit of detection
LOQlimit of quantification
LOX3lipoxygenase 3 (gene)
MACRmethacrolein
MAEmicrowave-assisted extraction
MA-HDmicrowave-assisted hydrodistillation
MAMmethylthioalkylmalate
MBO2-methylen-3-buten-2-ol
MCSOS-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide
MDmultidimensional
MEmale equivalents
Memethyl (in structural formula)
MEcPP2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2,4-cyclodiphosphate
MeJAmethyl jasmonate
MeSAmethyl salicylate
MEP2-C-methylerythritol-4-phosphate
MESImembrane extraction sorbent interface
MGLmethionine-γ-lyase
MHCmajor histocompatibility complex
MHEmultiple headspace extraction
MLmaple lactone
MMEmembrane microextraction
MSmass spectrometry, mass spectrometer
Msmesyl (SO2CH3; in structural formula)
MVAmevalonic acid/mevalonate
MVLmevalonolactone
MVKmethyl vinyl ketone
MWmolecular weight
MYBmyeloblast
NADPHnicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NBnarrow bore (column)
NISTNational Institute of Standards and Technology
NMON-methylmorpholine-N-oxide
NMRnuclear magnetic resonance
NOESYnuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy
NPQnonphotochemical quenching
NSnosespace
Nunucleophile (in structural formula)
OAVodour activity values
OBolfactory bulb
OCOoral cavity only (exposure)
OFCorbitofrontal cortex
OPother phytohormones
OPEozone production efficiency
ORolfactive receptor
ORNsolfactive receptor neurons
OVOhio Valley Speciality Chemical (brand of stationary phases)
OXP-012-decyl-1-oxaspiro[2.2]pentane
OXP-042-(4-hydroxybutyl)-1-oxaspiro[2.2]pentane
PANperoxyacetyl nitrate
PAPSadenosine-3′-phosphate-5′-phosphosulfate
PCAprincipal component analysis
PCSOS-propyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide
pdfportable document format
PeCSOtrans-S-1-propenyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide
PEGpoly(ethylene glycol)
PETpositron emission tomography
PBP1pheromone binding protein 1
PDParkinson’s disease
PDMSpoly(dimethylsiloxane)
PEPphosphoenol pyruvate
PGprotecting group
PGAphosphoglyceric acid
PGSSparticles from gas-saturated solutions
Phphenyl (in structural formula)
PLPpyridoxal-5′-phosphate
PMHSpoly(methylhydrosiloxane)
pp.pages
PPCposterior piriform cortex
PTR-MSproton transfer reaction–mass spectrometer
qMSquadrupole mass spectrometry (detector)
quant.quantitative
RAretinoic acid
ref.reference
RESSrapid expansion of supercritical fluids
RNAribonucleic acid
RSDrelative standard deviation
r.t.room temperature
RTLretention time locking
RubisCOribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
SAsalicylic acid
SAAsupercritical assisted atomization
SASsupercritical fluids (or gas) anti-solvent
SATserine acetyltransferase
SBSEstir bar sorptive extraction
SCskin conductance
SCC-GCshort capillary column gas chromatography
sc-CO2supercritical CO2
SDEsimultaneous distillation–extraction
SDOITSan Diego odor identification test
SEDSsolution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids
SFEsupercritical fluid extraction
SFEEsupercritical fluid extraction of emulsions
S-HSstatic headspace
SIMsingle ion monitoring
SIM-MSsingle ion monitoring–mass spectrometry
SIM-qMSsingle ion monitoring–quadrupole mass spectrometry
SiSTExsolvent in silicone tube extraction
SMPskimmed milk powder
SMSEsilicon membrane sorptive extraction
SOAsecondary organic aerosol
SPACEsolid phase aroma concentrate extraction
SPMEsolid phase microextraction
SROsstress-related odours
SSIsupercritical solvent impregnation
S&T-HSstatic and trapped headspace
TAStotal analysis systems
TCDthermal conductivity detector
TDSthermodesorption system
terttertiary
THFtetrahydrofuran
TICtotal ion current
TIC-MStotal ion current–mass spectrometry
TLCthin-layer chromatography
TMStrimethylsilyl (protecting group)
TMTthiol methyltransferases
TOFtime of flight
TPLSMtwo-photon laser scanning microscopy
TRGstemperature-responsive gels
Tstosyl (SO2C6H4CH3; in structural formula)
p-TSApara-toluenesulfonic acid
UFM-GCultra-fast module gas chromatography
UKUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme
USAUnited States of America
UVultraviolet (spectroscopy)
UV/Visultraviolet/visible (spectoscopy)
VOCvolatile organic compound
Vol.volume
WOFwarmed-over flavour
WPCwhey protein (isolate) concentrate

Names of scientific journals are abbreviated according to the Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index

1

Volatiles – An Interdisciplinary Approach

Andreas Herrmann

Firmenich SA, Division Recherche et Développement, 1 Route des Jeunes, B. P. 239, 1211 Genève 8, Switzerland

1.1 Introduction

Volatiles, and in particular biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), are everywhere. They directly and indirectly influence the lives of many plant and insect species, and even human beings in many ways. Transported by diffusion through the air, they perform numerous functions, for example as so-called ‘semiochemicals’, ‘infochemicals’ or ‘pheromones’ for the communication between insects and/or plants,1,2 for (insect) mating2–4 or even, as a consequence of their pleasant taste or smell to humans, as flavours and fragrances.4,5 Without volatile compounds, life on earth as we know it would be impossible. The structural variety in these compounds, which are generally based on a hydrocarbon skeleton with oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur as the most common heteroatoms, is almost infinite and always perfectly adapted to the specific role these molecules play in nature.

Biogenic VOCs are usually highly selective for a given target. This selectivity is presumably the most important property of these different compounds which, of course, is defined by their molecular structure (and the spatial arrangement of the different functional groups from which they are composed) and usually results in a very low ‘detection threshold’ of a given compound to its target species.6 This means that the receptor of the receiving species can selectively detect specific molecules at very low concentrations in the air (typically expressed in ng 1−1 of air) which, in some cases, can be a few molecules.

In contrast to many other target-specific compounds found in nature, volatiles are characterized by (relatively) high vapour pressures, allowing their efficient evaporation from various surfaces. This enables their transport through the air and thus to reach their biological target. Nevertheless, the term ‘volatile’ is usually not well defined, and the vapour pressures of compounds considered to be volatile can vary over several orders of magnitude.7 Some representative volatile compounds such as 118 are listed in . Their vapour pressures span nine orders of magnitude, ranging from the highly volatile methane thiol (1) to the relatively nonvolatile insect pheromone bombykol (18) from the silkworm moth Bombyx mori.

Furthermore, biogenic VOCs are generally characterized as being rather ‘hydrophobic’ which facilitates, among others, their efficient evaporation from water-based media into the air. The polarity of different compounds is usually expressed as the logarithm of their octanol/water partition coefficients (log Po/w);7,8 the corresponding values for compounds 118 are indicated in . Once again, one can see that these data vary considerably, ranging from values below 1 for relatively polar compounds 1 and 3 to highly apolar molecules such as 13 with a log Po/w above 9.

The numerous areas of research dealing with the investigation of volatile compounds are as varied as their structures and their physicochemical properties. Biologists and chemists have become interested in these compounds for various reasons. Because the same volatile compounds can have different functions, volatiles have been discussed separately by the specialists in different areas. Nevertheless, the same molecular structure is often of interest to a wide variety of quite different research topics such as the biosynthesis of the given volatile in plants, its analysis in compound mixtures by different techniques, its particular biological role as a signalling compound or pheromone, its use in pest control and, if associated with a pleasant taste or smell, as a flavour or fragrance, its chemical synthesis, the mechanism of its perception, its behaviour through encapsulation and processing, its controlled release, right up to its degradation in the environment (). In the following section the different interdisciplinary research aspects associated with a given compound are illustrated with the example of (E)-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol (geraniol, 11) as a typical volatile molecule with an average vapour pressure and log Po/w. At the same time, these aspects will allow the introduction of the various topics presented in the different chapters of this book and thus illustrate a typical lifecycle of volatile compounds from their biogeneration, via their release into the air, their role as semiochemicals, their specific recognition, through to their degradation in the atmosphere.

1.2 Geraniol – A Typical Example

Biogenic, bioactive volatiles, such as geraniol (11), are generated in plants from small precursor molecules in multistep enzymatic processes. As one of the main constituents of the essential oils of various rose species, monoterpene alcohol 11 is biosynthesized by condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP, 19) and 3,3-dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP, 20) with the help of geranyl diphosphate (GPP) synthetase, followed by dephosphorylation of GPP (21),9 as depicted in . GPP is of particular importance because it is the precursor of geraniol and of many different monoterpenes. The following chapter (Chapter 2) gives a general introduction to the various mechanisms involved in the biosynthesis of plant isoprenoids and illustrate the structural variety of terpenes generated by plants.

Vapour pressures and (logarithmic) octanol/water partition coefficients (log Po/w) of a series of representative volatile compounds

c01t001_fmt

aNote: Values calculated according to ref. 7.

Aspects of interdisciplinary research, using the example of geraniol

c01s001_fmt

The identification and quantification of the individual constituents isolated from plants is an important aspect in the understanding of the biochemical processes involved in their generation. Volatiles are analysed mainly by gas chromatography (GC), usually coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and some other more specific techniques. The volatility of such compounds allows specific sample preparation methods such as static and dynamic headspace analysis to be employed.10 Chapter 3 gives an account of the numerous methods used for the analysis of volatile compounds emitted from plants by discussing the scopes and limitations of the different techniques.

Biosynthesis of geraniol

c01s002_fmt

Plants, insects and other animals use volatile compounds for their communication with the environment.1 Besides its emission from flowers to attract pollinators, geraniol (11) is also a member of a class of so-called ‘herbivore-induced plant volatiles’ (HIPVs). Plants emit these compounds to defend themselves against herbivore attack by attracting natural enemies of the herbivores responsible for the plant damage. As an example, geraniol was found to attract wasps and flesh flies of the Braconidae and Sarcophagidae families, respectively.11 The specific aspects and implications of volatile signalling for plants and insects are discussed in Chapter 4.

Geraniol (11) has also been identified in the secretions of the Nasonov gland of honeybees, where the compound, together with a series of other volatiles, serves as a pheromone to mark the entrance of the hive, for mating and orientation, as for example for swarm clustering or guidance to flowers.12 Using insects and mammals as examples, Chapter 5 presents the classification, structural particularities and roles of pheromones in chemical communication.

Apart from acting as an attractant, geraniol was also found to repel certain insects, such as the malaria-transmitting mosquito Anopheles gambiae.13 Essential oils (EOs) containing geraniol (and other insect-repellent compounds) have thus been used for protection against blood-feeding insects, whilst other volatiles have been identified as being useful for the protection of agricultural crops. The potential to selectively repel or kill certain insects is an important aspect of volatiles in the area of pest control, as documented in more detail in Chapter 6.

Although geraniol (11) is readily available from natural sources, several methods for its synthesis have been proposed, some of which are illustrated in . Typically the compound is prepared from other monoterpenes14 such as myrcene (22), citral (23) or linalool (24) to usually afford mixtures of geraniol (11) and nerol (25). The selective preparation of specific isomers in high purities is therefore one of the major achievements of organic synthesis. Chapter 7 summarizes some of the challenges encountered in the synthesis of natural and non-natural fragrances. Besides allowing the preparation of natural compounds which are difficult to be accessed in large quantities, organic chemistry has delivered a multitude of new and entirely synthetic compounds, in particular for use in perfumery.

Chemical synthesis of geraniol

c01s003_fmt

Certain volatile molecules are also part of our everyday life as flavours present in our daily nutrition. Monoterpenes, such as geraniol, contribute to the floral aroma of a series of grape varieties used in wine-making.15 Many flavour volatiles, so-called ‘secondary metabolites’ in fruits or vegetables, are generated from fats or amino acid precursors during ripening. The mechanisms involved in the biogeneration and metabolism of these compounds are important for food preparation as well as in aspects of nutrition and health. Besides the terpenoid structures, sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compounds are particularly important flavour constituents. Whereas Chapter 8 discusses the biogeneration and the role of a variety of sulfur compounds encountered in onion and garlic, Chapter 9 focuses on the generation of flavours during food processing, as for example in the so-called ‘Maillard reaction’,16 with particular focus on the thermal effects detected during cooking. Because not all volatiles have a pleasant taste or smell, the understanding of these processes is also important in allowing the efficient minimisation of undesired malodour formation under various conditions.

Once the volatiles have reached their target, they are recognized by specific receptors, which trigger an electric signal perceived by the brain. The mechanisms of olfactive perception are quite complicated in both insects and humans. The general importance of understanding the mechanisms of olfaction was underlined by the granting of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Axel and Buck in 2004 for their discoveries of odorant receptors and the organisation of the olfactory system,17 which stimulated a general interest in exploring the chemistry and biology of volatile compounds in the life sciences.18 Chapter 10 gives a general overview of the basic principles and mechanisms involved in (human) perception.

To humans geraniol (11) has a pleasant, sweet, floral smell and is therefore among the most frequently used perfumery compounds.14,19 Perfumes are usually mixtures of many different volatile compounds created at the interface between art and science. In the general public, perfumery is most commonly associated with ‘fine fragrances’, but perfumes are also an important ingredient in body care and household products, such as shampoos, soaps, creams, deodorants, shower gels, surface cleaners, detergents, softeners and many others. Chapter 11 illustrates the particular artistic aspects of perfumery creation. For their creations, perfumers require a multitude of different molecules at their disposal. These compounds can be natural compounds extracted from natural raw materials, prepared selectively by biotechnical processes or by organic synthesis.

Many terpenes are sensitive to oxidation, either by oxygen in the air20 or by a variety of bio-oxidation processes initiated by bacteria and fungi21 (). To efficiently use susceptible terpenes such as geraniol (11) in commercial product formulations they have to be protected against (oxidative) degradation by using various encapsulation techniques.22 Chapter 12 examines a series of flavour encapsulation processes which are most commonly used to increase the stability of food ingredients and to control their release in applications.

Compounds formed by air oxidation of geraniol

c01s004_fmt

Release of geraniol by enzymatic cleavage of its glycoside conjugate

c01s005_fmt

Besides the physical capturing of volatiles within capsules and other matrices, ‘chemical’ delivery systems have been developed to slowly release small quantities of volatiles to allow the duration of their perception to be increased. Nature stores and transports terpenes, such as geraniol (11) as hydrosoluble glycoside conjugates (e.g. 26) before releasing them by enzymes into the environment,23 which served as an inspiration to use fragrance conjugates as controlled release systems in practical applications (). Chapter 13 gives an account of the various techniques which have been developed for the release of fragrance molecules via covalent bond cleavage of different natural and non-natural fragrance precursors, so-called ‘profragrances’ or ‘properfumes’. Of course, this concept can be generally applied to the controlled release of volatiles in other areas, as for example to attract or repel insects in pest control.

Another important area of interest concerns the (natural) biodegradation of volatiles in water or soil by the activity of various microorganisms. Nevertheless, as a consequence of their volatility, biogenic VOCs can also reach the atmosphere, where they are exposed to particular reaction conditions leading to their rapid degradation ().24 The investigation of these processes becomes more and more important to understand the lifecycle of natural compounds and to estimate the impact of biogenic volatiles on our planet’s climate. This book therefore concludes with a discussion of this important aspect with a summary of the gas phase chemistry of biogenic VOCs in the atmosphere (Chapter 14) as one aspect of their natural biodegradation.

Degradation of geraniol in the atmosphere

c01s006_fmt

1.3 Conclusion

The different topics of research mentioned above for one representative molecule such as geraniol (11) indicate the broad variety of interest in volatile compounds. With the structures of the volatiles being the common link to all the different research areas presented in the following chapters, it is on purpose that the reader will find many common molecular structures illustrating the different chapters and thus referring to the different domains of research grouped together in this book. To date, these aspects have mainly been discussed separately by specialists from different areas, and several textbooks and reviews on the individual topics are available. However, the goal of this book is to provide an interdisciplinary approach on the various aspects of the chemistry and biology of volatile compounds to a reader generally interested in this area. The chapters constituting this book are not intended to give an extensive or comprehensive review of each of the specific topics, but rather represent a conceptual and quite general overview of a series of different research areas. They should give the reader the opportunity to discover the basic aspects of the different disciplines, to illustrate parallels between the different domains and, with the numerous references given in the different chapters, to invite further reading.

As depicted in , there is a certain overlap between the different research areas, which of course results from the discussion of similar aspects from different viewpoints in several of the chapters. At the same time, other important aspects of research on volatile compounds might only be briefly mentioned or even entirely omitted. However, to keep this book within a reasonable length, this seemed to be unavoidable.

The respective interest in volatile compounds from so many different angles is an excellent occasion for the exchange and common learning in chemistry and biology, and I hope that the present book will stimulate discussions and collaborations within a highly interdisciplinary research field.

References

1. For a selection of recent reviews, see for example: (a) N. Dudareva, E. Pichersky, J. Gershenzon, Biochemistry of plant volatiles, Plant Physiol., 135, 1893–1902 (2004); (b) J. K. Holopainen, Multiple functions of inducible plant volatiles, Trends Plant Sci., 9, 529–533 (2004); (c) N. Bakthavatsalam, P. L. Tandon, Interactions between plant chemicals and the entomophages, Pestology, 29, 17–31 (2005); (d) Special section on plant volatiles, Science, 311, 803–819 (2006); (e) M. D’Alessandro, T. C. J. Turlings, Advances and challenges in the identification of volatiles that mediate interactions among plants and arthropods, Analyst, 131, 24–32 (2006); (f) L. G. W. Bergström, Chemical communication by behaviour-guiding olfactory signals, Chem. Commun., 3959–3979 (2008); (g) S. B. Unsicker, G. Kunert, J. Gershenzon, Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 12, 479–485 (2009).

2. For reviews, see for example: The Chemistry of Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals, S. Schulz (Ed.), Topics in Current Chemistry, Vols 239 and 240, Springer, Berlin, 2004 and 2005, and references cited therein.

3. For a selection of some recent reviews, see for example: (a) T. C. Baker, J. J. Heath, Pheromones: function and use in insect control, Compr. Mol. Insect Sci., 6, 407–459 (2005); (b) L. Stowers, T. F. Marton, What is a pheromone? Mammalian pheromones reconsidered, Neuron, 46, 699–702 (2005); (c) A. Bigiani, C. Mucignat-Caretta, G. Montani, R. Tirindelli, Pheromone reception in mammals, Rev. Physiol., Biochem., Pharmacol., 154, 1–35 (2005); (d) P. A. Brennan, F. Zufall, Pheromonal communication in vertebrates, Nature, 444, 308–315 (2006); (e) K. D. Broad, E. B. Keverne, More to pheromones than meets the nose, Nat. Neurosci., 11, 128–129 (2008).

4. E. Breitmaier, Terpenes – Flavors, Fragrances, Pharmaca, Pheromones, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.

5. See for example: (a) Flavours and Fragrances – Chemistry, Bioprocessing and Sustainability, R. G. Berger (Ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2007; (b) Chemistry and Technology of Flavors and Fragrances, D. J. Rowe (Ed.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2005.

6. Standardized Human Olfactory Thresholds, M. Devos, F. Patte, J. Rouault, P. Laffort, L. J. Van Gemert (Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.

7. Vapour pressures and log Po/w were calculated with the EPI suite PBT calculator 1.0.0 based on the EPIwin program, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D. C., 2000.

8. (a) A. Leo, C. Hansch, D. Elkins, Partition coefficients and their use, Chem. Rev., 71, 525–616 (1971); (b) A. J. Leo, Calculating log Poctfrom structures, Chem. Rev., 93, 1281–1306 (1993).

9. See for example: (a) T. Suga, T. Shishibori, The biosynthesis of geraniol and citronellol in Pelargonium roseum Bourbon, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 46, 3545–3548 (1973); (b) D. V. Banthorpe, D. R. S. Long, C. R. Pink, Biosynthesis of geraniol and related monoterpenes in Pelargonium graveolens, Phytochemistry, 22, 2459–2463 (1983); (c) V. S. Dubey, An overview of geraniol biosynthesis in Palmarosa (Cymbopogon martinii Roxb. var. motia) and its biological and pharmacological properties, Recent Progr. Med. Plants, 11, 75–97 (2006).

10. See for example: (a) K. Demeestere, J. Dewulf, B. De Witte, H. Van Langenhove, Sample preparation for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air and water matrices, J. Chromatogr. A, 1153, 130–144 (2007); (b) P. López, M. A. Huerga, R. Batlle, C. Nerin, Use of solid phase microextraction in diffusive sampling of the atmosphere generated by different essential oils, Anal. Chim. Acta, 559, 97–104 (2006).

11. See for example: D. G. James, Further field evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects, J. Chem. Ecol., 31, 481–495 (2005).

12. See for example: (a) T. Schmitt, G. Herzner, B. Weckerle, P. Schreier, E. Strohm, Volatiles of foraging honeybees Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and their potential role as semio-chemicals, Apidologie, 38, 164–170 (2007); (b) I. Lamprecht, E. Schmolz, B. Schricker, Pheromones in the life of insects, Eur. Biophys. J., 37, 1253–1260 (2008).

13. M. O. Omolo, D. Okinyo, I. O. Ndiege, W. Lwande, A. Hassanali, Repellency of essential oils of some Kenyan plants against Anopheles gambiae, Phytochemistry, 65, 2797–2802 (2004).

14. H. Surburg, J. Panten, Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials, 5th edn, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.

15. See for example: F. Luan, A. Mosandl, A. Münch, M. Wüst, Metabolism of geraniol in grape berry mesocarp of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Scheurebe: demonstration of stereoselective reduction, E/Zisomerization, oxidation and glycosylation, Phytochemistry, 66, 295–303 (2005).

16. See for example: (a) H. Nursten, The Maillard Reaction: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Implications, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2005; (b) The Maillard Reaction: Chemistry at the Interface of Nutrition, Aging, and Disease, J. W. Baynes, V. M. Monnier, J. M. Ames, S. R. Thorpe (Eds), New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 2005; (c) Process and Reaction Flavors: Recent Developments, ACS Symp. Ser., Vol. 905, D. K. Weerasinghe, M. K. Sucan (Eds), American Chemical Society, Washington D. C., 2005.

17. (a) R. Axel, Scents and sensibility: a molecular logic of olfactory perception (Nobel lecture) Angew. Chem., 117, 6264–6282 (2005); Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 6110–6127 (2005); (b) L. B. Buck, Unraveling the sense of smell (Nobel lecture) Angew. Chem., 117, 6283–6296 (2005); Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 6128–6140 (2005).

18. Special section on chemical sensing, Nature, 444, 287–321 (2006).

19. S. Arctander, Perfume and Flavor Chemicals, published by the author, Montclair, 1969.

20. C. Bäcktorp, L. Hagvall, A. Börje, A.-T. Karlberg, P.-O. Norrby, G. Nyman, Mechanism of air oxidation of the fragrance terpene geraniol, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 101–106 (2008).

21. J. L. Bicas, A. P. Dionísio, G. M. Pastore, Bio-oxidation of terpenes: an approach for the flavor industry, Chem. Rev., 109, 4518–4531 (2009).

22. (a) A. Madene, M. Jacquot, J. Scher, S. Desorby, Flavour encapsulation and controlled release – a review, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 41, 1–21 (2006); (b) M. A. Augustin, Y. Hemar, Nano- and micro-structured assemblies for encapsulation of food ingredients, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 902–912 (2009).

23. See for example: J.-E. Sarry, Z. Günata, Plant and microbial glycoside hydrolases: volatile release from glycosidic aroma precursors, Food Chem., 87, 509–521 (2004).

24. (a) F. M. N. Nunes, M. C. C. Veloso, P. A. de P. Pereira, J. B. de Andrade, Gas-phase ozonolysis of the monoterpenoids (S)-(+)-carvone, (R)-(−)-carvone, (−)-carveol, geraniol and citral, Atmos. Environ., 39, 7715–7730 (2005); (b) C. D. Forester, J. E. Ham, J. R. Wells, Geraniol (2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-8-ol) reactions with ozone, and OH radical: rate constants and gas-phase products, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1188–1199 (2007).