UK | Canada | Ireland | Australia
New Zealand | India | South Africa
Penguin Books is part of the Penguin Random House group of companies whose addresses can be found at global.penguinrandomhouse.com.
First published by Hamish Hamilton 1953
Published in Penguin Books 1958
This edition published in Penguin Books 1997
Reprinted in Penguin Classics 2000
Copyright 1953 by L. P. Hartley
This edition copyright © Douglas Brooks-Davies, 1997
Cover photograph © Jeff Hutchinson, winner of the Guardian and Penguin Modern Classics photography competition 2003
The moral right of the editor has been asserted
All rights reserved
ISBN: 978-0-141-19073-0
Introduction
THE GO-BETWEEN
Note on the Text
Notes
Textual Appendix
Chronology of L. P. Hartley
Further Reading
Acknowledgements
Follow Penguin
Let the conversation begin…
Follow the Penguin Twitter.com@penguinukbooks
Keep up-to-date with all our stories YouTube.com/penguinbooks
Pin ‘Penguin Books’ to your Pinterest
Like ‘Penguin Books’ on Facebook.com/penguinbooks
Listen to Penguin at SoundCloud.com/penguin-books
Find out more about the author and
discover more stories like this at Penguin.co.uk
PENGUIN BOOKS
Leslie Poles Hartley was born in Whittlesey, Cambridgeshire, in 1895 and was educated at Harrow and Balliol College, Oxford. During the First World War he was a junior officer in the British Army, though he was never on active service. For more than thirty years from 1923 he was indefatigable fiction reviewer for such periodicals as the Spectator, the Saturday Review, the Sketch, the London Magazine and Time and Tide. He published his first book, a collection of short stories entitled Night Fears, in 1924. The Shrimp and the Anemone, his first full-length novel, did not appear until 1944. The first volume of a trilogy, it was followed by The Sixth Heaven (1946) and Eustace and Hilda (1947), which won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize, and is also the title by which the whole work is generally known. It was recognized immediately as a major contribution to contemporary English fiction. His other novels include The Boat (1949) and The Go-Between (1953), which was awarded the Heinemann Foundation Prize of the Royal Society of Literature in 1954 and was later made into an internationally successful film, while the film version of The Hireling (1957) won the principal award at the 1973 Cannes festival. In 1967 he published The Novelist’s Responsibility, a collection of critical essays. His later books include My Sister’s Keeper (1970), Mrs Carteret Receives (1971) and The Harness Room (1971). He was awarded the CBE in the New Year’s Honours List in 1956.
L. P. Hartley died in 1972. Lord David Cecil described him as ‘One of the most distinguished of modern novelists; and one of the most original. For the world of his creation is composed of such diverse elements. On the one hand he is a keen and accurate observer of the processes of human thought and feeling; he is also a sharp-eyed chronicler of the social scene. But his picture of both is transformed by the light of a Gothic imagination that reveals itself now in a fanciful reverie, now in the mingled dark and gleam of a mysterious light and a mysterious darkness … Such is the vision of life presented in [his] novels.’
Douglas Brooks-Davies was born in London in 1942 and educated at the Merchant Taylors’ School, Crosby, and Brasenose College, Oxford. He gained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool. Until 1993 he was Senior Lecturer in English Literature at the University of Manchester and is currently Honorary Research Fellow there, as well as being a stained-glass artist. His publications include Number and Pattern in the Eighteenth-Century Novel (1973); Spenser’s ‘Faerie Queene’: A Critical Commentary on Books 1 and 2 (1977); The Mercurian Monarch (1983); Pope’s ‘Dunciad’ and the Queen of Night (1985); Spenser: ‘The Faerie Queene’ Books 1–3 (1987); Fielding, Dickens, Gosse, Iris Murdoch and Oedipal ‘Hamlet’ (1989); Silver Poets of the Sixteenth Century (1992); and Edmund Spenser: Selected Shorter Poems (1995). He wrote the volume on Dickens’s Great Expectations for Penguin Critical Studies (1989) and was Founder and General Editor of Manchester University Press’s ‘Literature in Context’ series. Most recently he has prepared a modernized edition of Spenser’s Fairy Queen (1996).
For Timothy Webb
To Miss Dora Cowell
But, child of dust, the fragrant flowers,
The bright blue sky and velvet sod
Were strange conductors to the bowers
Thy daring footsteps must have trod.
EMILY BRONTË
The past is a foreign country:1 they do things differently there.
When I came upon the diary it was lying at the bottom of a rather battered red cardboard collar-box,2 in which as a small boy I kept my Eton collars.3 Someone, probably my mother, had filled it with treasures dating from those days. There were two dry, empty sea-urchins;4 two rusty magnets,5 a large one and a small one, which had almost lost their magnetism; some negatives6 rolled up in a tight coil; some stumps of sealing-wax; a small combination lock with three rows of letters; a twist of very fine whipcord, and one or two ambiguous objects, pieces of things, of which the use was not at once apparent: I could not even tell what they had belonged to. The relics were not exactly dirty nor were they quite clean, they had the patina of age; and as I handled them,7 for the first time for over fifty years, a recollection of what each had meant to me came back, faint as the magnets’ power to draw, but as perceptible. Something came and went between us: the intimate pleasure of recognition, the almost mystical thrill of early ownership – feelings of which, at sixty-odd, I felt ashamed.
It was a roll-call in reverse; the children of the past announced their names, and I said ‘Here’. Only the diary refused to disclose its identity.
My first impression was that it was a present someone had brought me from abroad. The shape, the lettering, the purple limp leather curling upwards at the corners, gave it a foreign look; and it had, I could see, gold edges. Of all the exhibits it was the only one that might have been expensive. I must have treasured it, why then could I not give it a context?
I did not want to touch it and told myself that this was because it challenged my memory: I was proud of my memory and disliked having it prompted. So I sat staring at the diary, as at a blank space in a crossword puzzle. Still no light came, and suddenly I took the combination lock and began to finger it, for I remembered how, at school, I could always open it by the sense of touch when someone else had set the combination. It was one of my show-pieces, and when I first mastered it drew some applause, for I declared that to do it I had to put myself into a trance: and this was not quite a lie, for I did deliberately empty my mind and let my fingers work without direction. To heighten the effect, however, I would close my eyes and sway gently to and fro, until the effort of keeping my consciousness at a low ebb almost exhausted me; and this I found myself instinctively doing now, as to an audience. After a timeless interval I heard the tiny click and felt the sides of the lock relax and draw apart; and at the same moment, as if by some sympathetic loosening in my mind, the secret of the diary flashed upon me.8
Yet even then I did not want to touch it; indeed my unwillingness increased, for now I knew why I distrusted it. I looked away and it seemed to me that every object in the room exhaled the diary’s enervating power, and spoke its message of disappointment and defeat. And as if that was not enough, the voices reproached me with not having had the grit to overcome them. Under this twofold assault I sat, staring at the bulging envelopes around me, the stacks of papers tied up with red tape – the task of sorting which I had set myself for winter evenings, and of which the red collar-box had been almost the first item; and I felt, with a bitter blend of self-pity and self-reproach, that had it not been for the diary, or what the diary stood for, everything would be different. I should not be sitting in this drab, flowerless room, where the curtains were not even drawn to hide the cold rain beating on the windows, or contemplating the accumulation of the past and the duty it imposed on me to sort it out. I should be sitting in another room, rainbow-hued,9 looking not into the past but into the future:10 and I should not be sitting alone.
So I told myself, and with a gesture born of will, as most of my acts were, not inclination, I took the diary out of the box and opened it.
Diary
for the year
1900
it said in a copper-plate script unlike the lettering of today; and round the year thus confidently heralded, the first year of the century,11 winged with hope, clustered the signs of the Zodiac, each somehow contriving to suggest a plenitude of life and power, each glorious, though differing from the others in glory.12 How well I remembered them, their shapes and attitudes; and I remembered too, though it was no longer potent for me, the magic with which they were then invested, and the tingling sense of coming fruition they conveyed – the lowly creatures no less than the exalted ones.
The Fishes sported deliciously, as though there were no such things as nets and hooks; the Crab had a twinkle in its eye, as though it was well aware of its odd appearance and thoroughly enjoyed the joke; and even the Scorpion carried its terrible pincers with a gay, heraldic air, as though its deadly intentions existed only in legend.13 The Ram, the Bull, and the Lion epitomized imperious manhood; they were what we all thought we had it in us to be; careless, noble, self-sufficient, they ruled their months with sovereign sway. As for the Virgin,14 the one distinctively female figure in the galaxy, I can scarcely say what she meant to me. She was dressed adequately, but only in the coils and sweeps of her long hair; and I doubt whether the school authorities, had they known about her, would have approved the hours of dalliance my thoughts spent with her, though these, I think, were innocent enough. She was, to me, the key to the whole pattern, the climax, the coping-stone, the goddess – for my imagination was then, though it is no longer, passionately hierarchical; it envisaged things in an ascending scale, circle on circle, tier on tier, and the annual, mechanical revolution of the months did not disturb this notion. I knew that the year must return to winter and begin again; but to my apprehensions the zodiacal company were subject to no such limitations: they soared in an ascending spiral towards infinity.
And the expansion and ascension, as of some divine gas, which I believed to be the ruling principle of my own life, I attributed to the coming century. The year 1900 had an almost mystical appeal for me; I could hardly wait for it: ‘Nineteen hundred, nineteen hundred,’ I would chant to myself in rapture; and as the old century drew to its close, I began to wonder whether I should live to see its successor. I had an excuse for this: I had been ill and was acquainted with the idea of death;15 but much more it was the fear of missing something infinitely precious – the dawn of a Golden Age.16 For that was what I believed the coming century would be: a realization, on the part of the whole world, of the hopes that I was entertaining for myself.
The diary was a Christmas present from my mother, to whom I had confided some, though by no means all, of my aspirations for the future, and she wanted its dates to be worthily enshrined.
In my zodiacal fantasies there was one jarring note, to which, when I indulged them, I tried not to listen, for it flawed the experience. This was my own role in it.
My birthday fell in late July17 and I had an additional reason, an excellent one, though I should have been loath to mention it at school, for claiming the Lion as my symbol. But much as I admired him and what he stood for, I could not identify myself with him, because of late I had lost the faculty which, like other children, I had once revelled in, of pretending that I was an animal. A term and a half at school had helped to bring about this disability in my imagination; but it was also a natural change. I was between twelve and thirteen, and I wanted to think of myself as a man.
There were only two candidates, the Archer and the Water-carrier,18 and, to make the choice more difficult, the artist, who probably had few facial types at his command, had drawn them very much alike. They were in fact the same man following different callings. He was strong and sturdy and this appealed to me, for one of my ambitions was to become a kind of Hercules.19 I leaned to the Archer as the more romantic, and because the idea of shooting appealed to me. But my father had been against war,20 which I supposed was the Archer’s profession; and as to the Water-carrier, though I knew him to be a useful member of society I could not help conceiving of him as a farm-labourer or at best a gardener, neither of which I wanted to be. The two men attracted and repelled me at the same time: perhaps I was jealous of them. When I studied the title-page of the diary I tried not to look at the Sagittarius–Aquarius combination, and when the whole conception took wing and mounted to the zenith, drawing the twentieth century with it for a final heavenly romp, I sometimes contrived to leave it behind. A zodiacal sign without portfolio,21 I then had the Virgin to myself.
One result of the diary was that I went to the top of the class for knowing the signs of the Zodiac. In another way its influence was less fortunate. I wanted to be worthy of the diary, of its purple leather, its gold edges, its general sumptuousness; and I felt that my entries must live up to all these. They must record something worthwhile, and they must reach a high standard of literary attainment. My ideas of what was worthwhile were already rather advanced and it seemed to me that my school life did not provide events fit for such a magnificent setting as my diary was, or for the year 1900.
What had I written? I remembered the catastrophe well enough, but not the stages that led up to it. I turned the pages. The entries were few. ‘Tea with C’s pater and mater – very jolly.’ Then, more sophisticated, ‘Jolly decent tea with L’s people. Muffins, scones, cakes and strawberry jam.’ ‘Drove to Canterbury in 3 breaks. Visited Cathedral, very interresting. Thomas A’Beckett’s blood.22 Très riping.’ ‘Walk to Kingsgate Castle.23 M. showed me his new knife.’ This was the first reference to Maudsley; I turned the pages more quickly. Ah, here it was – the Lambton House saga.24 Lambton House was a nearby preparatory school with which we felt ourselves on terms of special rivalry; they were to us what Eton is to Harrow.25 ‘Played Lambton House At Home. Match drawn 1–1.’ ‘Played Lambton House Away. Match drawn 3–3.’ Then, ‘Last and Ultimate and Final Replay. Lambton House VANQUISHED 2–1!!!! McClintock scored both goals!!!!’
After that, no more entries for a time. Vanquished! That was the word for which I was made to suffer.26 My attitude to the diary was twofold and contradictory: I was intensely proud of it and wanted everybody to see it and what I had written in it, and at the same time I had an instinct for secrecy and wanted nobody to see it. I spent hours balancing the pros and cons of either course. I thought of the applause that would greet the diary as it was wonderingly passed from hand to hand. I thought of the enhancement to my prestige, the opportunities to swank of which I should avail myself discreetly but effectively. And on the other hand there was the intimate pleasure of brooding over the diary in secret, like a bird sitting on its eggs, hatching, creating; losing myself in zodiacal reveries, speculating upon the glorious destiny of the twentieth century, intoxicated by my almost sensuous premonitions of what was coming to me. These were joys that depended upon secrecy; they would vanish if I told them or even betrayed their source.
So I tried to get the best of both worlds: I hinted at the possession of hidden treasure, but I did not say what it was. And for a time this policy was successful, curiosity was aroused, questions were asked: ‘Well, what is it? Tell us.’ I enjoyed parrying these: ‘Wouldn’t you like to know?’ I enjoyed going about with an ‘I could if I would’ air,27 and a secret smile. I even encouraged questionnaires of the ‘animal, vegetable, or mineral’28 type, breaking them off when the scent became too hot.
Perhaps I gave too much away; at any rate the one thing I hadn’t guarded against happened. I had no warning of it, none: it happened at break, in the middle of the morning, and I suppose I hadn’t looked in my desk that day. Suddenly I was surrounded by a mob29 of grinning urchins chanting: ‘Who said “vanquished”? Who said “vanquished”?’ And in a moment they were all upon me: I was borne to the ground: various forms of physical torture were applied, and my nearest tormentor – he was almost as breathless as I, so many were pressing on him, cried: ‘Are you vanquished, Colston, are you vanquished?’
For a moment I certainly was, and for the whole of the next week, which seemed an eternity, I was subjected to the same treatment at least once a day – not always at the same hour, for the ringleaders chose their opportunity with care. Sometimes, as the day wore on, I thought I had escaped; then I would see the nefarious band in conclave; cries of ‘vanquished’ would break out and the pack would be upon me. As quickly as I could I admitted myself vanquished, but I was usually sore all over before quarter was given.
Strangely enough, though so idealistic about the future I was quite realistic about the present: it never occurred to me to connect my school life with the Golden Age or think that the twentieth century was letting me down. Nor did I have to restrain an impulse to write home or sneak to one of the masters. I had brought it on myself, I knew, by using that pretentious word, and did not dispute the right of public opinion to punish me. But I was desperately anxious to prove I was not vanquished; and as I clearly could not do that by physical force, I must resort to guile. Rather to my surprise the diary had been returned to me. Apart from having the word ‘vanquished’ scrawled all over it, it was uninjured. I attributed its restitution to magnanimity; I think now that it was probably due to prudential considerations, to a fear that I should report its disappearance as a theft. To report a theft was not against our code, it was not sneaking, as telling about my physical sufferings would have been. I gave them credit for this, but I was most anxious to put an end to the persecution and also to get even with them. Even, but no more: I was not vindictive. Luckily the jeering words were written in pencil. Retiring with the defaced diary to the lavatory I set about erasing them and it was there, in the relaxed state of mind that mechanical rubbing induces, that I had my idea.
They would believe, so I reasoned, that the diary had been discredited for ever as a talisman for self-esteem – and indeed, they were nearly right, for at first I felt that it had lost its magic by being violated: I could hardly bear to look at it. But as one by one the taunting words ‘vanquished’ disappeared, it began to recover its value for me, I felt its power returning. How wonderful if I could make it the instrument of my vengeance! There would be poetic justice in that. Moreover my enemies would be off their guard, they would never suspect danger from a gun they had so thoroughly spiked. And at the same time their consciences would not be quite easy about it, it would be a symbol of the injury they had done me, and they would be all the more sensitive to an attack from it.
In the privacy of my retreat I practised assiduously; and then I cut my finger, dipped my pen in blood, and transcribed the two curses into the diary.
I looked at them now, but still legible though not comprehensible, except for the two names printed in block letters, JENKINS AND STRODE, which stood out in sinister intelligibility. Comprehensible they never were, for they made no sense: I concocted them out of figures and algebraical symbols and what I remembered of some Sanskrit characters I had seen, and pored over, in a translation of the Peau de Chagrin30 at home. CURSE ONE was followed by CURSE TWO. Each took a page of the diary. On the next page, which was otherwise blank, I had written:
CURSE THREE
AFTER CURSE THREE THE VICTIM DIES
Given under my hand and
written in my BLOOD
BY ORDER
THE AVENGER.
Faded though the characters were, they still breathed malevolence, they could still pluck a superstitious nerve, and I ought to have been ashamed of them. But I was not. On the contrary I felt a certain envy of the self of those days, who would not take things lying down, who had no notion of appeasement, and who was prepared to put all he had into making himself respected in society.
What I expected to be the outcome of my plan I hardly knew, but I put the diary in my locker, which I purposely left unlocked, even ajar, with the cover of the diary showing, and awaited results.
I did not have long to wait – the results came very soon and were very disagreeable. Within a few hours I was set upon, and the drubbing I got then was the worst of the whole series. ‘Are you vanquished, Colston, are you vanquished?’ cried Strode, bestriding me in the mêlée. ‘Who’s the avenger now?’ And he pressed his fingers under my eyes, a trick which, it was commonly believed, would cause them to pop out.
That night, in bed, my smarting eyes shed tears for the first time. It was my second term at school; I had never been unpopular before, still less had I been systematically bullied, and I didn’t know what to make of it. I felt I had shot my bolt.31 All my persecutors were older than I was and I couldn’t possibly gather together a gang to fight them. And failing that, I couldn’t ask for sympathy. It was perfectly correct to enlist supporters if action was to be the outcome; but to confide in someone for the sake of confiding, that simply was not done. All the other four boys in my dormitory (Maudsley was one) knew of my trouble, of course; but not one would have dreamed of mentioning it, not even when they saw my scars and bruises – perhaps least of all then. Even to say ‘Bad luck’ would have been in bad taste, as suggesting that I was not able to look after myself. It would have been like pointing out some physical defect. The law that one must consume one’s own smoke32 was absolute, and no one subscribed to it more whole-heartedly than I. A late-comer to school, I had uncritically accepted all its standards. I was a conformist: it never occurred to me that because I suffered there was something wrong with the system, or with the human heart.
One act of consideration, however, my room-mates showed me and I still remember it with gratitude. It was our custom to talk for some few minutes after lights out, simply because to do so was against the rules; and if any of the five failed to join in he was pointedly reminded of it and told he was a funk, and letting down the good name of the dorm. Whether my sobs were audible I don’t know, but I dare not trust my voice to speak and nobody censured my silence.
The next day at break I wandered about by myself, keeping close to the wall, for there, at any rate, I could not be surrounded. I was keeping a weather eye open for the gang (where there had been nobody suddenly there were six) when a boy I hardly knew came up with an odd look on his face and said,
‘Have you heard the news?’
‘What news?’ I had hardly spoken to anybody.
‘About Jenkins and Strode.’ He looked at me narrowly.
‘What is it?’
‘They were out on the roofs last night and Jenkins slipped and Strode tried to hold him but he couldn’t and was pulled off too. They’re both in the San with concussion of the brain and their people have been sent for. Jenkins’s mater and pater have just arrived. They came in a cab with the blinds drawn down and Jenkins’s mater is in black already. I thought you might be interested.’
I said nothing and the boy, with a backward glance at me, went off whistling. I felt faint and didn’t recognize myself: it was so extraordinary not to be afraid of the gang any more. But I was afraid – afraid of what they might do to me in case I was a murderer. The bell went and I began to walk towards the door in the corner, and two of the boys in my dorm came up and shook hands with me and said ‘Congrats’ with respect in their faces. So then I knew it was all right.
Afterwards I was quite a hero, for nobody, it turned out, had much liking for Jenkins and Strode, though nobody had raised a finger to stop them ragging me. Even their four chums who used to help them to knock me about said they only did it because Jenkins and Strode made them. Jenkins and Strode had told everyone about the curses, meaning to make a fool of me, and what the whole school wanted to know was: Did I mean to use the third curse? Even the boys in the top classroom spoke to me about this. It was generally agreed that it would be more sporting not to, but that I should be quite within my rights if I did: ‘Those chaps want a lesson,’ the Head of the School told me. However, I didn’t use it. I was secretly terrified at what I had done, and if it hadn’t been for the current of public opinion running my way I might easily have got into a morbid state about it. As it was, I devised a number of spells intended to make the victims recover, but these I did not enter into my diary, partly because they would have detracted from the sense of utter triumph I was being encouraged to feel, and partly because, if they failed, my public reputation as a magician would have suffered. Nor would it have been a popular move; for during the few days that the boys’ lives hung in the balance we all went about in a subdued manner with long faces, but secretly hoping for the worst. Ghoulish reports – faces under sheets, parents in tears – were circulated, and the mood of tension and crisis demanded an outlet in catastrophe. Of this it was cheated, but very gradually; and during the drawn-out anticlimax I received many rather rueful congratulations on my forbearance in not having launched the third curse, which most of the boys, including in certain moods myself, believed would have been fatal.
‘Are you vanquished, Colston, are you vanquished?’ No, I was not; I had come through with flying colours. I was the hero of the hour, and though my vogue did not last long at that high level, I never quite lost it. I became a recognized authority on two subjects dear to the hearts of most boys at that time: black magic and code-making, and I was frequently consulted on both these subjects. I even made a little out of it, charging threepence a time for my advice, which I gave only after certain necromantic formalities had been gone through, passwords exchanged, and so on. I also invented a language and had the delirious pleasure, for a few days, of hearing it used round me. It consisted, if I remember, in making the syllable ‘ski’ alternately the prefix and suffix of each word in a sentence, thus: ‘Skihave youski skidone yourski skiprep?’ It was considered very funny so I got a reputation as a wag as well. And also as a master of language.33 I was no longer made fun of if I used long words, on the contrary they were expected of me; the diary became a quarry for synonyms of the most ambitious kind. It was then that I began to cherish a dream of becoming a writer – perhaps the greatest writer of the greatest century, the twentieth. I had no idea what I wanted to write about: but I composed sentences that I thought would look well and sound well in print: that my writing should achieve the status of print was my ambition, and I thought of a writer as someone whose work fulfilled print’s requirements.
One question was often put to me, but I never answered it: What exactly was the meaning of the curses that had literally brought about the downfall of Jenkins and Strode? How did I translate them? I didn’t, of course, myself know what they meant. I could easily have produced a translation but I felt for several reasons it would be wiser not to. Kept secret, they would still minister to my prestige; revealed, and used by irresponsible people, who knew what harm they might do? They might even be turned against me. Meanwhile a good deal of private curse-making went on: strips of paper covered with cabalistic signs were passed from hand to hand. But though their authors sometimes claimed to have obtained results, nothing happened to challenge the supremacy of mine.
‘Are you vanquished, Colston, are you vanquished?’ No, I was not; I had won, and my victory, though its methods were unorthodox, had fulfilled the chief requirement of our code: I had won it by myself, or at any rate without calling in the help of any human agency. There had been no sneaking. Also, I had kept within the traditional terms of schoolboy experience; so fantastic in some ways, so matter of fact in others. The curses were not really a shot in the dark, though their outcome had been so sensational. They were aimed at the superstitiousness that I instinctively knew my schoolfellows possessed. I had been a realist, I had somehow sized up the situation and solved it with the means at my command, and I enjoyed a realist’s reward. If I looked on Southdown Hill School34 as being in some way an adjunct of the twentieth century, or as being intimately related to the Zodiac – a hierarchy of glorious, perfected beings slowly ascending into the ether – what a cropper I should have come.
With an effort I took up the diary again and turned the closely written pages, so buoyant with success. February, March, April – with April the entries fell off for it was the holidays – May full up again and the first half of June. Again the dearth of entries and I was in July. Under Monday 9th I had written ‘Brandham Hall’.35 A list of names followed, the names of my fellow guests, and then: ‘Tuesday 10th. 84.7 degrees.’ Each day after that I had recorded the maximum temperature and much else, until: ‘Thursday 26th. 80.7 degrees.’
This was the last entry in July, and the last entry in the diary. I did not have to turn the pages to know they would be blank.
It was 11.5, five minutes later than my habitual bedtime. I felt guilty at being still up, but the past kept pricking at me and I knew that all the events of those nineteen days in July were astir within me, like the loosening phlegm in an attack of bronchitis, waiting to come up. I had kept them buried all these years, but they were there, I knew, the more complete, the more unforgotten, for being carefully embalmed. Never, never had they seen the light of day; the slightest stirring had been stifled with a scattering of earth.36
My secret – the explanation of me – lay there. I take myself much too seriously, of course. What does it matter to anyone what I was like, then or now? But every man is important to himself at one time or another; my problem had been to reduce the importance, and spread it out as thinly as I could over half a century. Thanks to my interment policy I had come to terms with life, I had made a working – working was the word – arrangement with it, on the one condition that there should be no exhumation. Was it true, what I sometimes told myself, that my best energies had been given to the undertaker’s art? If it was, what did it matter? Should I have acquitted myself better, with the knowledge I had now? I doubted it; knowledge may be power, but it is not resilience, or resourcefulness, or adaptability to life,37 still less is it instinctive sympathy with human nature; and those were qualities I possessed in 1900 in far greater measure than I possess them in 1952.38
If Brandham Hall had been Southdown Hill School I should have known how to deal with it. I understood my schoolfellows, they were no larger than life to me. I did not understand the world of Brandham Hall; the people there were much larger than life; their meaning was as obscure to me as the meaning of the curses I had called down on Jenkins and Strode; they had zodiacal properties and proportions. They were, in fact, the substance of my dreams, the realization of my hopes; they were the incarnated glory of the twentieth century; I could no more have been indifferent to them than after fifty years the steel could be indifferent to the magnets in my collar-box.
If my twelve-year-old self, of whom I had grown rather fond, thinking about him, were to reproach me: ‘Why have you grown up such a dull dog, when I gave you such a good start? Why have you spent your time in dusty libraries, cataloguing other people’s books instead of writing your own? What has become of the Ram, the Bull, and the Lion, the example I gave you to emulate? Where above all is the Virgin, with her shining face and long curling tresses, whom I entrusted to you’ – what should I say?
I should have an answer ready. ‘Well, it was you who let me down, and I will tell you how. You flew too near to the sun, and you were scorched.39 This cindery creature is what you made me.’
To which he might reply: ‘But you have had half a century to get over it! Half a century, half the twentieth century, that glorious epoch, that golden age that I bequeathed to you!’
‘Has the twentieth century,’ I should ask, ‘done so much better than I have? When you leave this room, which I admit is dull and cheerless, and take the last bus to your home in the past, if you haven’t missed it – ask yourself whether you found everything so radiant as you imagined it. Ask yourself whether it has fulfilled your hopes. You were vanquished, Colston, you were vanquished, and so was your century, your precious century that you hoped so much of.’
‘But you might have tried. You needn’t have run away. I didn’t run away from Jenkins and Strode, I overcame them. Not at once, of course. I went to a private place and I thought about them a great deal, they were very real to me, I can tell you. I can still remember what they looked like. Then I took action. They were my enemies. I called down curses on them, and they fell off the roof and had concussion. Then I wasn’t bothered with them any more. I didn’t mind thinking about them a bit, I don’t now. Did you take any action? Did you call down curses?’
‘That,’ said I, ‘was for you to do, and you didn’t do it.’
‘But I did – I cast a spell.’
‘What good was a spell, when it was curses that were needed? You didn’t want to injure them, Mrs Maudsley or her daughter or Ted Burgess or Trimingham. You wouldn’t admit that they had injured you, you wouldn’t think of them as enemies. You insisted on thinking of them as angels,40 even if they were fallen angels. They belonged to your Zodiac. “If you can’t think of them kindly, don’t think of them at all. For your own sake, don’t think of them.” That was your parting charge to me, and I have kept it. Perhaps they have gone bad on me. I didn’t think of them because I couldn’t think of them kindly, or kindly of myself in relation to them. There was very little kindness in the whole business, I assure you, and if you had realized that, and called down curses, instead of entreating me, with your dying breath, to think about them kindly –’
‘Try now, try now, it isn’t too late.’
The voice died away. But it had done its work. I was thinking of them. The cerements, the coffins, the vaults, all that had confined them was bursting open, and I should have to face it, I was facing it, the scene, the people, and the experience. Excitement, like hysteria, bubbled up in me from a hundred unsealed springs. If it isn’t too late, I thought confusedly, neither is it too early: I haven’t much life left to spoil. It was a last flicker of the instinct of self-preservation which had failed me so signally at Brandham Hall.
The clock struck twelve. Round me were ranged the piles of papers, dingy white and with indented outlines like the cliffs of Thanet.41 Under those cliffs, I thought, I have been buried. But they should witness my resurrection, the resurrection that had begun in the red collar-box, whose contents were still strewn about it. I picked up the lock and looked at it again. What was the combination of letters that had opened it? I might have guessed without troubling to put myself into a trance: egotism might have prompted me. I said it aloud to myself wonderingly; for many years it had been only a written word. It was my own name, LEO.42