Cover Page

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Copyright

List of Contributors

Preface

About the Companion Website

Chapter 1: What is a Coherent Flow Structure in Geophysical Flow?

1.1 Introduction

1.2 From random turbulence to coherent flow structures

1.3 Coherent flow structures in low Reynolds-number flows over smooth boundaries

1.4 Large-scale, high Reynolds-number coherent flow structures

1.5 Does scale matter?

1.6 What is the difference between the mean flow and CFS?

1.7 Coherent flow structures within geophysical flows: future research needs

References

Chapter 2: Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layers

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Eddy structures

2.3 Interactions of eddies on different scales

2.4 Extracting coherent structure from geophysical flows

2.5 Conclusions

2.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 3: Structural Attributes of Turbulent Flow over a Complex Topography

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Experiments

3.3 Results

3.4 Discussion

3.5 Conclusions

3.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 4: Coherent Flow Structures in the Pore Spaces of Permeable Beds underlying a Unidirectional Turbulent Boundary Layer: A Review and some New Experimental Results

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Flow across a permeable boundary layer: background

4.3 Boundary layer structure in the freeflow region over permeable beds

4.4 Flow within the transition layer of permeable beds

4.5 Discussion

4.6 Summary and challenges for future work

4.7 Acknowledgements

Notation

References

Chapter 5: Instabilities in Stratified Shear Flow

5.1 Introduction to Kelvin–Helmholtz and Holmboe instabilities

5.2 One-sidedness

5.3 Application of the Taylor–Goldstein equation to asymmetric profiles

5.4 Mixing

5.5 Field observations

5.6 Conclusions

References

Chapter 6: Scalar Turbulence within the Canopy Sublayer

6.1 Introduction

6.2 A brief review of scalar turbulence inside canopies

6.3 Scope

6.4 Scalar turbulence within the CSL

6.5 Summary and conclusions

6.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 7: On the Structure of Wall Turbulence in the Thermally Neutral Atmospheric Surface Layer

7.1 Introduction

7.2 Field scale: atmospheric surface layer

7.3 Laboratory scale: turbulent boundary layer

7.4 Results

7.5 Discussion and conclusions

References

Chapter 8: Critical Reflections on the Coherent Flow Structures Paradigm in Aeolian Geomorphology

8.1 Introduction

8.2 Coherent flow structure end-member reference states

8.3 Flow structures over flat sandy surfaces

8.4 Flow structures over dunes

8.5 Discussion

8.6 Summary and conclusions

References

Chapter 9: Coherent Flow Structures in Vegetated Channels

9.1 Introduction

9.2 Coherent structures in vegetated channels

9.3 Conclusion

9.4 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 10: Coherent Eddy Structures over Plant Canopies

10.1 Introduction

10.2 Evidence for organized motion

10.3 Buoyancy forcing

10.4 Summary and conclusions

10.5 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 11: SPIV Analysis of Coherent Structures in a Vegetation Canopy Model Flow

11.1 Introduction

11.2 Experimental setup

11.3 Results

11.4 Discussion and conclusion

11.5 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 12: Calculation and Eduction of Coherent Flow Structures in Open-Channel Flow Using Large-Eddy Simulations

12.1 Introduction

12.2 Method of LES

12.3 Examples

12.4 Conclusions

References

Chapter 13: Detection and Analysis of Coherent Flow Structures in a Depth-Limited Flow over a Gravel Surface

13.1 Introduction

13.2 Previous approaches to study CFS over gravel surfaces

13.3 Methodology

13.4 Results

13.5 Discussion

13.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 14: COHSTREX: Coherent Structures in Rivers and Estuaries Experiment

14.1 Introduction

14.2 Stratified flow experiment

14.3 Unstratified flow experiment: thermal imaging

14.4 Summary

References

Chapter 15: Intermittent Suspension and Transport of Fine Sediment over Natural Tidal Bedforms

15.1 Introduction

15.2 Field site and data acquisition

15.3 Data analysis methods

15.4 Results

15.5 Discussion

15.6 Conclusions

15.7 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 16: Large-Scale Coherent Flow Structures in Alluvial Pools

16.1 Introduction

16.2 Background

16.3 Methods

16.4 Results

16.5 Discussion and conclusion

References

Chapter 17: From Macroturbulent Flow Structures to Large-Scale Flow Pulsations in Gravel-Bed Rivers

17.1 Introduction and research context

17.2 Methods

17.3 Results

17.4 Discussion

17.5 Implications and conclusions

17.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 18: Coherent Secondary Flows over a Water-Worked Rough Bed in a Straight Channel

18.1 Introduction

18.2 Methods

18.3 Results

18.4 Discussion

18.5 Conclusions

18.6 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 19: Coherent Flow Structures, Initiation of Motion, Sediment Transport and Morphological Feedbacks in Rivers

19.1 Introduction

19.2 Grain-flow interaction: recent developments

19.3 Fluctuating fluid forces

19.4 Particle dislodgement paradox

19.5 Resolution of the particle dislodgement paradox

19.6 Analytical formulation

19.7 Experimental results

19.8 Thoughts on coherent structures and grain entrainment

19.9 Some additional thoughts on the impulse concept and particle entrainment

19.10 Conclusion

19.11 Acknowledgement

Notation

References

Chapter 20: Turbulence Modulation by Suspended Sediment in a Zero Mean-Shear Geophysical Flow

20.1 Introduction

20.2 Methods

20.3 Results

20.4 Discussion

20.5 Conclusions

20.6 Acknowledgement

References

Chapter 21: Effect of Migrating Bed Topography on Flow Turbulence: Implications for Modelling Sediment Transport

21.1 Introduction

21.2 Characterization of bed topography

21.3 Flow velocities above migrating bed forms

21.4 Turbulence patterns modulated by bed forms

21.5 Sediment transport modelling

21.6 Summary and concluding remarks

21.7 Acknowledgements

References

Chapter 22: Turbulence Structure and Sand Transport over a Gravel Bed in a Laboratory Flume

22.1 Introduction

22.2 Materials and methods

22.3 Results and discussion

22.4 Conclusions

References

Chapter 23: Coherent Structures and Mixing at a River Plume Front

23.1 Introduction

23.2 Background

23.3 Field campaign and measurements

23.4 Results

23.5 Comparison to prior field and laboratory results

23.6 Summary

References

Chapter 24: Interfacial Waves as Coherent Flow Structures associated with Continuous Turbidity Currents: Lillooet Lake, Canada

24.1 Introduction

24.2 Methods

24.3 Results and discussion

24.4 Conclusions

References

Index

Title Page

2013014152

List of Contributors

Ronald J. Adrian    School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States. rjadrian@asu.edu


Joseph F. Atkinson    Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, New York 14260, United States. atkinson@buffalo.edu


Andreas C. W. Baas    Department of Geography, King's College London, The Strand, London, VC2R 2LS, United Kingdom. andreas.baas@kcl.ac.uk


Julio M. Barros    Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 United States. jmbarros@illinois.edu


Bernard O. Bauer    Earth and Environmental Sciences and Physical Geography, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7, Canada. bernard.bauer@ubc.ca


Marius Becker    MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen 28359, Germany. mbecker@marum.de


Sean J. Bennett    Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14261, United States. seanb@buffalo.edu


James L. Best    Departments of Geology, Geography and Geographic Information Science, Mechanical Science and Engineering and Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States. jimbest@illinois.edu


Gianluca Blois    Departments of Mechanical Science and Engineering and Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States, and International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. blois@illinois.edu


Jeffrey R. Carpenter    Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States. jeffrey.carpenter@yale.edu


Daniela Cava    CNR – Institute of Atmosphere Sciences and Climate, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy. d.cava@isac.cnr.it


C. Chris Chickadel    Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States. chickadel@uw.edu


Kenneth T. Christensen    Departments of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States, and International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. ktc@illinois.edu


Michael Church    Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada. mchurch@geog.ubc.ca


Clinton L. Dancey    Baker Environmental Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States. cld@vt.edu


Panayiotis Diplas    Imbt Environmental Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States. panos2007@gmail.com


Michael J. Fay    Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14261, United States. faymichael@gmail.com


John J. Finnigan    Marine and Atmospheric Research, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, Australia. john.finnigan@csiro.au


Efi Foufoula-Georgiou    St. Anthony Falls Laboratory and National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States. efi@umn.edu


Michele Guala    Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States. mguala@umn.edu


Richard J. Hardy    Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. r.j.hardy@durham.ac.uk


Patrick A. Hesp    School of the Environment, Flinders University, South Australia, 5042, Australia. Patrick.hesp@flinders.edu.au


Alexander R. Horner-Devine    Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States. arhd@uw.edu


Yinting Hou    Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, New York 14260, United States. yintinh@buffalo.edu


Derek W. T. Jackson    Centre for Coastal and Marine Research, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT5S 1SA, Northern Ireland. D.jackson@ulster.ac.uk


Andrew T. Jessup    Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States. jessup@apl.washington.edu


Gabriel G. Katul    Nicholas School of the Environment, Box 80328, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States. gaby@duke.edu


Ray Kostaschuk    Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada. rkostasc@sfu.ca


Roger A. Kuhnle    United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS 38655, United States. Roger.Kuhnle @ars.usda.gov


Eva Kwoll    MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen 28359, Germany. ekwoll@marum.de


Eddy J. Langendoen    United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS 38655, United States. Eddy.Langendoen@ars.usda.gov


Gregory A. Lawrence    Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. lawrence@civil.ubc.ca


Jeff LeHew    Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States. lehew@caltech.edu


Daniel G. MacDonald    Department of Estuarine and Ocean Sciences, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Fairhaven, MA 02719, United States. dmacdonald@umassd.edu


Bruce J. MacVicar    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada. bmacvicar@uwaterloo.ca


Timothy I. Marjoribanks    Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. Tim.marjoribanks@durham.ac.uk


Geneviève A. Marquis    Département de Géographie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 3R9, Canada. marquis.genevieve@uqam.ca


Cheryl McKenna Neuman    Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada. cmckneuman@trenu.ca


Beverly J. McKeon    Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States. mckeon@caltech.edu


Stuart J. McLelland    Department of Geography, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom. s.j.mclelland@hull.ac.uk


Ricardo Mejia-Alvarez    Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 United States. Presently: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 United States. rimejal@lanl.gov


Amy Menczel    Department of Geography, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. amenczel@gmail.com


Meredith Metzger    Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States. M.metzger@utah.edu


Heidi Nepf    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. hmnepf@mit.edu


Lana Obach    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON N2L 3G1, Canada. Lmg217@mail.usask.ca


Daniel R. Parsons    Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX United Kingdom. D.Parsons@hull.ac.uk


Edward G. Patton    Earth System Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80302, USA. patton@ucar.edu


Corrado Pellachini    Bren School of Environmental Science and Management and Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, United States. corrado.pellachini@ing.unitn.it


Laurent Perret    LUNAM Université, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LHEEA, UMR CNRS 6598, 1 rue de la Noë BP 92101, F-44321 Nantes Cedex 3, France. laurent.perret@ec-nantes.fr


Davide Poggi    Dipartimento di Idraulica, Trasporti ed Infrastrutture Civili, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy. davide.poggi@polito.it


Jeffrey Rominger    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. jtr@mit.edu


Nicholas J. Rosser    Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. n.j.rosser@durham.ac.uk


André G. Roy    Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. agroy@uwaterloo.ca


Tony Ruiz    LUNAM Université, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LHEEA, UMR CNRS 6598, 1 rue de la Noë BP 92101, F-44321 Nantes Cedex 3, France. Present address: PSA Peugeot Citroën, DRIA/DSTF/MFTA, Case Courier VV1405 2, route de Gisy, F-78943 Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France. tony.ruiz@mpsa.com


Gregory H. Sambrook Smith    School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. g.smith.4@bham.ac.uk


Roger H. Shaw    Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States. rhshaw@ucdavis.edu


Arvind Singh    St Anthony Falls Laboratory and National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States. sing0336@umn.edu


Mario Siqueira    Universidade de Brasilia, Departmento de Eng. Mecânica, Brasilia, DF, Brazil. mariosiqueira@unb.br


Thorsten Stoesser    Hydro-environmental Research Centre, Cardiff School of Engineering, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff CF243AA, United Kingdom. stoesser@cf.ac.uk


Stefan A. Talke    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, United States. s.a.talke@pdx.edu


Edmund W. Tedford    Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. ttedford@eos.ubc.ca


Jeremy G. Venditti    Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. jeremy_venditti@sfu.ca


Ian J. Walker    Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P5. Canada. ijwalker@uvic.ca


Giles F. S. Wiggs    School of Geography and Environment, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3QY, United Kingdom. gwiggs@ouce.ox.ac.uk


Christian Winter    MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany. cwinter@marum.de


Daniel G. Wren    United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS 38655, United States. Daniel.Wren@ars.usda.gov


Lijun Zong    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. lz248@mit.edu

Preface

Understanding fluid flow at Earth's surface is of central importance to understanding the dynamics of Earth's surface and its lower atmosphere. These geophysical flows, in environments ranging from deserts to forests and from rivers to the oceans and atmosphere, are structured across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, from small-scale turbulent vortices generated at the boundaries and responsible for grain motion, to large-scale circulation patterns that generate atmospheric and geomorphic features visible from space. This book derives from a conference held at Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, 3–5 August 2011 entitled Coherent Flow Structures in Geophysical Flows at the Earth's Surface. The conference built on the success of an earlier meeting entitled Coherent Flow Structures in Open Channel Flows held at the University of Leeds, UK, in 1995, which produced a well-cited book of the same name (edited by Ashworth, Bennett, Best and McLelland and published in 1996 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd). The 1995 conference launched an impressive array of research into the structure of fluid flows in rivers. The 2011 meeting had a wider scope than the earlier conference, expanding beyond rivers to flows in all natural environments at Earth's surface. The 2011 conference brought together the research community that uses numerical simulations, laboratory modelling and field observation to study coherent flow structures (CFS), their interaction with sediment, vegetation, and benthic communities, the manipulation of such flow structures for managing sedimentary environments, and the key roles they play in Earth surface dynamics.

The conference would not have been possible without the dedicated volunteer efforts of a small group of graduate students, postdocs and staff at Simon Fraser University including Maureen Attard, Ryan Bradley, Megan Hendershot, Caroline Le Bouteiller, Martin Lin, John Ng, Dan Shugar and Andrea Vigna. Justin Ankenmann from SFU Meeting, Event and Conference Services arranged many of the conference logistics and made the process much easier for the organizers. The US National Science Foundation (nsf.gov), the National Center for Earth Surface Dynamics (nced.umn.edu) and TSI (tsi.com) provided funds for student conference registration and accommodation, allowing an impressive, enthusiastic and motivated group of young researchers to attend the meeting. Additional funds for coffee breaks, lunches, keynote speaker travel costs, student awards and a field trip on the Fraser River were provided through generous support from the British Society for Geomorphology (geomorphology.org.uk), the Canadian Geomorphology Research Group (cgrg.geog.uvic.ca), Dantec Dynamics (dantecdynamics.com), Golder Associates Ltd. (golder.ca), LAVision (lavision.de), Met-Flow (met-flow.com), Nortek USA (nortekusa.com), Reson (reson.com), Rockland Scientific (rocklandscientific.com), Simon Fraser University (sfu.ca), SFU Geography (sfu.ca/geography/), SonTek/YSI (sontek.com), Teledyne RD Instruments (rdinstruments.com), the Jack and Richard Threet Chair at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (illinois.edu) and Wiley (wiley.com).

There were 107 abstracts submitted to the Coherent Flow Structures in Geophysical Flows at the Earth's Surface conference and it was not possible to produce a book with a chapter from each contributor. With this volume, the editors attempted to compile a group of contributions that represent the very best reviews and the most exciting new research presented at the meeting, and attempted also to achieve a breadth that covers the field so that this book might become a state-of-the-art treatment on CFS in flows at Earth's surface. Ultimately, this volume illustrates how the study of coherent flow structures is now being applied to geophysical flows at Earth's surface.

fprefg001

The first chapter represents the editors' attempt to define what a coherent flow structure is in geophysical flows and how the idea is currently being applied. In the second chapter, Ron Adrian describes the primary coherent flow structures identified in hydraulically smooth boundary layer flows at low Reynolds numbers. Chapters 3–5 deal with the dynamics of CFS in flows at Earth's surface. Subsequent chapters deal with CFS in airflows (6–8) and through vegetation canopies (6 and 9–11). New methods for examining CFS are reviewed in Chapters 12–14. The final group of chapters deals with coherent flow structures in sediment-transporting flows. This includes chapters on CFS in estuarine tidal flows (14 and 15), morphological scale CFS in rivers (16–18), the dynamic linkage between CFS and sediment movement (19 and 20), the statistical properties of turbulence in sediment transporting flows (21 and 22) and CFS associated with gravity currents (23 and 24).

The editors are extremely grateful to the volume contributors for all their hard work, cooperation and for making this book possible. Each paper was fully peer reviewed and, where possible, by someone who attended the conference and someone who did not. The editors thank this group of reviewers for their essential, yet uncredited, contribution to the volume. The staff at Wiley, especially Rachael Ballard, Fiona Seymour and Lucy Sayer, have been very helpful and supportive in bringing this volume to publication.

We hope that this volume, like its predecessor, will become an authoritative record of advances in our understanding of coherent flow structures in flows at Earth's surface and that it will set the stage for new research developments in the field.


Jeremy G. Venditti

Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada


James L. Best

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States


Michael Church

The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada


Richard J. Hardy

Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

About the Companion Website

This book is accompanied by a companion website:


www.wiley.com/go/venditti/coherentflowstructures


The website includes: