THE MAJORITY OF you know The Football Ramble as the four men on the microphones each week, but there is a fifth man in our number – Jon Teague. It is no exaggeration to say that he takes leadership and responsibility for anything and everything that occurs when the mics are faded down (and also one or two things when they’re faded up), from organisation of live shows to the securing of commercial agreements, not to mention his tireless work to improve our frankly appalling diary management. We wouldn’t be in the position to write our first book (or indeed do anything much) without him. What’s more, he does all of this for minimal credit and recognition. Jon, we salute you and your incessant and relentless Spurs knowledge. Thank you, sir!
Thanks also must go to our Dutch uncle, Ben Bailey Smith, and our adopted son, Joel Grove, as well as our online king Matt Isherwood and queen, the Always Excellent Kelly Welles. Cheers also to acast for having our backs, everyone at Penguin Random House but particularly James Keyte and Ben Brusey, as well as Paul at Absolute Radio. Ed Davis must be thanked for providing the subtitle – it was a spot-on observation and we couldn’t agree with it more.
This book is also for Chris Applegate and Chris Wildey, no longer of this parish but forever somehow a part of it.
The Football Ramble would also like to individually thank:
I would like to thank my amazing wife-to-be, Holly, for always being inspiring and understanding of a man who spends so much time at the behest of this ridiculous game. Thanks also to Mum, Dad and Andrew for always being supportive.
Thanks to Marcus, Luke, Pete and Jon Teague: I can think of no better people with whom to effectively spend most of my time in a cupboard. Extra thanks to Jon for doing the grown-up work like contracts and hanging rivals off bridges.
Thanks to Rupert Fryer for his invaluable help with understanding how the South American league systems work, or rather helping me to get a grasp on how actually they don’t.
Last but by no means least, thanks to you, our readers and listeners. I wouldn’t say that we couldn’t do it without you, we could, but if we did it would just be pathetic by now.
Thanks first and foremost to my beautiful Mimi, you’re everything to me.
Also to my wonderful family but particularly my late Uncle Les, who set the football fire blazing within me in the first instance. May it never be quenched!
Thanks to JT for everything – you’re not only a brilliant colleague but also a true friend. Thanks particularly for your help with the Media and Referees chapter, it was invaluable.
Thanks also to Thomas Moss, Dan Poulton, James Sullivan and Duncan Haskell for constant inspiration and Andy Brassell and James Horncastle, two men who wear their ridiculous football knowledge lightly enough to still be great company.
And to all our listeners for accompanying us on this wonderful journey. You’re the best co-pilots we could ask for.
Thanks first to my marvellous family Speller, aka the wind beneath my wings.
Also to Jamie, Paul and Ruth for making excellent sounding boards, as well as Laurence McKenna for the endless positivity and guidance.
I am especially appreciative to Jonathan, David and all the chaps at The Blizzard for the football knowledge, encouragement and ice cream.
A great big thank you from the very bottom of my heart to all of you for journeying with us on this football ramble. We couldn’t and wouldn’t do it without you.
And lastly, of course, my fellow Ramblers – Jim, Jon, Luke and Pete – without whom none of this would exist and thus life would be a lot less fun.
Thanks to Chankles, Alex G and his rabble, Matty, Marc, Al Z, Mam and Dad and Christine Fish. The Nonstuff crew and Les Ferdinand. Love ya x
The Football Ramble emerged from London towards the end of 2007 as a genuinely refreshing football voice, and quickly established itself as one of the most influential and entertaining shows about the world’s most popular sport.
Multi-award winning, it is now a must-listen for any discerning fan who enjoys the more entertaining side of the game.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to The Football Ramble
From the hosts of the UK’s biggest independent sports podcast comes a celebration of football in all its forms.
Tackling the real issues from fans you won’t see or hear on Sky Sports, or anywhere else for that matter, the boys rewrite football history in their own unique style.
From the weird to the wonderful, from the Alan Pardew to the Kevin Keegan, join Marcus, Luke, Pete and Jim as they guide you through the beautiful game.
After all, three’s company, but four’s a ramble…
THERE’S SOMETHING IRRESISTIBLE about balls. If a ball is nearby then every atom of you is compelled to bounce it, throw it or kick it. It calls to you like a mysterious orb made of pure fun. You don’t know why, you sometimes don’t even notice it happening, but you just need to play with it.
Much is written about how football began, about who invented it and at what point it became enough like the game we have today to be considered football. Maybe it exists because it has to. Something about us needs to kick around a spherical object and football has evolved so that we can satisfy this urge. It’s true beginnings probably come from our ancient ancestors kicking fruit about because when there’s a roundish object on the ground something inside us just has to absolutely leather it. Even as a 34-year-old man I’m still tempted by every stray bottle cap I come across. In fact I once broke my toe attempting to kick one, but that’s a story for one other book. Kicking things is fun. Throw in an objective like scoring to give it some competitive purpose and you have a sport.
To people like ourselves, football is a big part of our lives that has always just been there. We’ve been meeting since 2007 to enthuse and despair about it into microphones then release our thoughts into the wild simply because we’re hooked. All fans have a history with it, yet it has a long history without us. Of course it hasn’t always just been there. It’s evolved over time to become the behemoth it is now. However it started, it’s been quite a journey . . .
Football was formalised in England in 1863 when the Football Association got together in a pub and decided on a definitive set of rules for the sake of practicality. This is often considered to be the birth of the modern game but the true history of football goes back a lot further than that no doubt drunken afternoon. The Chinese have such a legitimate claim to have invented it that FIFA recognise one of their ancient sports, cuju – the literal translation of which is ‘to kick a ball’ – as being the earliest form of football.
The first written reference to cuju came more than 2,000 years ago during the Han dynasty (206 BC–AD 220). It began as military fitness training but became popular among the aristocracy, with games providing entertainment at the Emperor’s birthday celebrations and other formal occasions. It’s hard to overstate how similar it became to modern football both in terms of the game itself and the role it played in society. It wasn’t simply a primitive, lawless kickabout. It was a properly organised, competitive sport. Initially it was played with teams of twelve to sixteen players facing off on a square court, with six crescent-shaped goals at either end. Over time it evolved to become like a cross between volleyball and headers and volleys, played with a single goal located in the centre of the pitch. Players scored by shooting the ball through a hole in the middle. It had referees, penalties and many other things that are integral to the modern game. Maybe it even had frustrated tablet warriors, bashing abuse into bits of stone and chucking them at players after they’d had a bad game.
During the Han dynasty, Emperor Wudi loved it so much that he had his servants write articles about it in what may have been the first examples of minute-by-minute reports. They’re hard enough on a laptop, let alone on a piece of parchment when you have no access to replays and face the very real threat of execution if you happen to miss who actually scored because you were finishing off a sentence about who conceded the corner.
During the Song dynasty (970–1279, as if you needed reminding) the sport was so popular that many major Chinese cities had their own fully professional cuju clubs, playing in a nationwide league called the qiyun she. These are considered to be the first sports clubs of any kind.
It was a big deal, so much so that around this time the Emperor Taizu became known for his freestyle cuju, in which he’d perform tricks as modern exhibition players do, except much better because it was like the Queen doing it.
As with football centuries later, commercialisation followed this popularity. It’s not as if players were endorsing ancient bamboo-flavoured soft drinks but many were fully fledged professionals who became rich and famous through their skill. Female cuju players were also popular, with records showing that a seventeen-year-old girl once beat an entire team of soldiers in what is perhaps the earliest and most authentic recorded result of Chinese whispers. One women’s game is believed to have featured 153 players, playing in front of tens of thousands of fans.
Sadly, the game went into decline during the Ming dynasty (that’s 1368–1644), possibly because everyone was getting really into vases instead. As a sport it became associated with brothels and vice, with teams of prostitutes organising and playing games to attract customers, which seems both coy and forward at the same time. This reputation diminished its popularity so much that it ceased to exist at all, though at one point during the Qing dynasty (1644–1912, obviously) it was modified to be played on ice skates in what was effectively a spin-off. That’s some pretty modern thinking. If this has happened before, and as football becomes more like a product than a sport, then it can be only a matter of time before we get ‘The Premier League – On Ice!’ or perhaps a World Cup in Antarctica. It makes as much practical sense as a World Cup in Qatar, more so if you factor in global warming.
So football, this mad and addictive game that we all love, that is ours, has happened before. As a fan it’s hard to get your head around that, especially as it was popular over a period of twelve centuries, far longer than football as we know it has existed. Maybe cuju wasn’t even the first time it had happened. The dinosaurs at the top of the food chain must have needed something to do when they weren’t eating. Tyrannosaurus rex would have had the pace for it and their tails would have provided a useful extra limb – with arms as rubbish as that they wouldn’t have been playing basketball, for God’s sake.
Dinosaurs aside, cuju definitely wasn’t the first competitive ball game. Many were played throughout the ancient world and some outdate cuju, though these weren’t nearly as similar to football and FIFA certainly don’t recognise them. Probably because of all the violent deaths . . .
The oldest ball game historians know of is broadly known as the Mesoamerican ball game, which was really many similar games played in the ancient cultural region that stretched from modern Mexico down into Central America. The Mayans called their version pok-a-tok, the Aztecs knew it as tlachtli and the game that is still played today is called ulama. The oldest court discovered has been dated to 1400 BC and courts have been found as far south as Nicaragua and as far north as Arizona. Interestingly, records of both cuju and the Mesoamerican games include references to a mysterious, nomadic figure known only as ‘Kanu’, something that has baffled historians.
A common objective of the games was to keep the ball off the ground without using your hands, a point being scored when the other team failed to return the ball. The Mayans added stone rings that hung high on the court walls and were used as goals. In most versions players had to use their hips rather than their feet. This would be unwieldy enough with a modern ball but these players used a solid rubber thing about the size of a basketball. It was also played on a stone court, meaning players would end up bloodied and bruised from simply playing the game as it was supposed to be played. There are many accounts of players dying from internal bleeding caused by the injuries they sustained.
It’s all pretty horrifying and that’s before we even get to the human sacrifice. If you didn’t die from playing the game you could be killed for losing it, with the captain of the vanquished side, or sometimes the entire team, offered up as a sacrifice for the gods. I would definitely have died doing this were I around at the time. Games had a religious significance, with the ball representing the movement of celestial bodies. Those that ended in sacrifice correlated with the cycles of the sun and moon. This was because the Mayans believed that two of their gods – the twins Hunahpu and Xbalanque – had travelled to the underworld to battle death gods called Xibalbans in a booby-trapped ball game. They were victorious and eventually transformed themselves into the sun and the moon, meaning that sacrifices must be made so that both could rise each day. It all seems so obvious once you know that.
What’s particularly galling about this is that evidence for the sacrificial element appears fairly late in the archaeological records, at which point those in charge had surely figured out that the sun comes up every day regardless of what you do. The late addition suggests it was intended as an improvement, like it was goal-line technology or vanishing spray. Perhaps the authorities had a hidden agenda: ‘That Axayacatl was terrible today. This team will never win anything with him as captain. By the way, how’s your maize doing? Mine is awful. The gods must be seriously displeased.’
‘Mine is exactly the same. Hang on. I’ve got an idea . . .’
Much of the art depicting the sacrifices made at the games shows decapitation, leading some scholars to believe that the newly available supply of heads were then used as balls. At least the rubber balls didn’t have teeth. The pressure must have been unbearable – Sam Allardyce bellowing at you for not tracking back is one thing; making sure you don’t get your head lopped off as the only alternative to the sun disappearing for ever is something else.
Though ulama is still played, it is done so only in a few places in Mexico. When the Catholic Spanish conquistadors arrived in the sixteenth century they suppressed the game because of what they considered to be pagan elements – and because they favoured a high-pressing, quick-tempo passing game – and the gruesome practice of human sacrifice came to an end. Recently it has been reintroduced in preparations for the 2022 World Cup.
The ancient Greeks had a game called episkyros and the Romans had an equivalent, known as harpastum. Much of what is known about both has been pieced together from poems, stories, paintings and vases. The European Cup features an image of a man balancing a ball on his knee that originally appeared on a marble vase from ancient Greece. Ornaments were the highlights packages of the time. Where modern footballers can simply record themselves scoring on Match of the Day, the Greeks and Romans would have to sit eagerly by the kiln to see if their goal was as good as they remembered.
Both episkyros and harpastum bore similarities to rugby. It’s thought that the aim of both was to keep the ball in the air and on your side of the pitch while the opposition attempted to steal it and get it on to theirs. It sounds almost jolly and twee – the kind of thing you might do with your partner if you existed solely in a yoghurt advert – but as with everything that ever happened in the ancient world it was punctuated by extreme violence. One of the rules of harpastum was that only the player with the ball could be tackled. Imagine having to specify that. It’d be like managing Lee Cattermole. As if everyday life wasn’t risky enough back then, the Greeks also played their version naked, just for the added frisson of some testicular or vaginal jeopardy.
Harpastum was popular among Roman children, who would play it in the street. We know this because Cicero, the Roman philosopher, politician and lawyer, wrote of a court case in which a barber accidentally slit the throat of a man he was shaving after he was struck by a wayward ball. Hitting your neighbour’s window is bad enough but causing a man to execute a customer in his admittedly poorly conceived outdoor barber shop doesn’t bear thinking about. I can only conclude that the victim must have been an ancestor of Kevin Keegan to have suffered such a slapstick death. That, or Rome’s answer to Sweeney Todd simply murdered a man in broad daylight and blamed it on those pesky kids.
What’s striking about so many of these games is that they had structure and organisation, although not so much in Britain, where chaos reigned supreme. The early history of football and its ancestors often seems like it was full of violence as we know about it only through records that were primarily related to crime or medical emergencies. However, in some cases this is simply because it was incredibly violent.
Mob football began in the Middle Ages and is where the modern game has its roots. It was a combination of football, rugby and rioting. The number of players was unlimited as sides were made up of entire towns rather than teams. You could use your hands and essentially do anything as the only rule was that you couldn’t kill anyone. Imagine having to specify that. It’d be like managing Lee Cattermole. Terrible injuries occurred all the time but people simply got on with it. If you severed a leg while playing you merely slapped some leeches on the wound, played on, then spent the next month dying an agonisingly slow death.
The ‘goals’ were markers at the far ends of each town and everywhere was part of the game – from paths and squares to hedgerows and rivers – inevitably leading to significant property damage. In some cases the game was won when one team managed to kick the ball on to the neighbouring town’s church balcony.
This may sound chaotic but it also sounds brilliant. Were it reintroduced today, say as a one-off Tyne-Wear derby, it would attract record viewing figures. The full squads, the management staff, season-ticket holders, casual fans, bystanders caught up in the thrill of it, pets, everyone, just going at it for bragging rights as the drone cameras fly overhead.
The first record of a game that featured the exclusive kicking of a ball in England is from 1280, in Ulgham, Northumberland, noted because a player died after he ran into an opponent’s dagger, of course. Daggers must have been an essential part of the kit back then. ‘Honestly ref, he just ran into my knife.’
The first time it was actually referred to as football came in 1314 when London Mayor Nicholas de Farndone banned it. There were thirty bans between 1314 and 1667 because football was – and this will come as no surprise – really violent. James I of Scotland banned it in the Football Act of 1424, which featured the words ‘na man play at the fut ball’ in a dialect still spoken there today.
Henry VIII was another notable figure to ban it, in 1540, though he must have liked it at some stage. In 1526 he ordered the first known pair of football boots, from the Great Wardrobe. This was the store in which his clothing was kept and not, disappointingly, what he believed in a gout-induced fever to be a magical cupboard that spoke only to him. When ordering some footwear he sent for ‘4 velvet pairs and 1 leather pair for football’, possibly for use on one of his many, many stag weekends. Tu-dor! Tu-dor!
Evidently, William Shakespeare was also not a fan, with his character Kent using the term ‘base football player’ as an insult in King Lear. This is disappointing as it’s nice to think that, as observers of people, he and his bard pals would have watched the chaos unfold from the sidelines, perhaps biting their thumbs and chanting ‘Who art thou?! Who art thou?!’ at bloodied rival townspeople after a few meads.
It’s understandable that people took issue with football. It sounds like it was a genuine public menace, with games leaving a trail of destruction in their wake. If I was a market trader just trying to make a living by selling my pewterware and a football match came along and smashed up my business I know I wouldn’t be happy. Games were even organised as a pretext to rioting. Despite all this the bans were difficult to enforce as people simply ignored them and a crude set of rules began to take shape.
Around 1660 Francis Willughby wrote his Book of Games. It was the first account to describe fundamentals such as scoring, goals themselves, tactics and rules. He described an early version of the outlawing of high tackles, which had typically gruesome results: ‘They often break one another’s shins when two meet and strike both together against the ball, and therefore there is a law that they must not strike higher than the ball.’ Well over 350 years on some players still struggle with this.
The chaos continued regardless, so much so that people seemed to think it was a good idea to play on roads. Eventually the Highway Act of 1835 was passed, introducing a fine for anyone still mad enough to use a road as a football pitch. Football and disorder went hand in hand. What this game needed was some good old British rules . . .
England was the first country to have codified rules and this came to be because public school teams wanted to play each other. This proved problematic as they all used different rules, like men in pubs who make you play them at pool when you really don’t want to and suddenly it’s for cash and then the rent is gone again.
The Cambridge Rules were created in 1848 to unify them all but there were still other sets that followed. Sheffield FC had their own rules – which, as they were the first officially founded football club, started in 1857, isn’t as weird as it sounds. For a while they must have had only themselves to play so could do whatever they wanted. They killed the time spent waiting for other clubs to form by coming up with things like crossbars, free-kicks and half-time.
In 1862 a man named J.C. Thring created the Uppingham Rules, number three of which gives an exasperated insight into the approach many players still favoured at the time: ‘KICKS must be aimed only at the ball.’
Those italics are Thring’s. When the Football Association was founded in 1863 they decided to put an end to all this piffle and poppycock by agreeing on a definitive set of rules. The Laws of the Game of Association Football were drawn up by a man called Ebenezer Cobb Morley, who, despite sounding like a heavy handed parody of a Charles Dickens character, honestly did exist. In fact, the FA was formed in the first place only because Morley wrote to a London newspaper called Bell’s Life, proposing the idea of a governing body for football. That led to a meeting in a London pub called the Freemasons’ Tavern where, by the sound of it, very serious men arrived on penny farthings, stroked their undoubtedly impressive waxed moustaches and defined the foul throw. Huzzah! The meeting was attended by representatives from a number of now defunct clubs, including some jokers called No Name Club of Kilburn, who sound like a pub quiz team who blagged their way into the discussions. It was decided that elements such as hacking – kicking your opponent’s shins – and carrying the ball would be outlawed. Those who disagreed with these changes broke away and went on to form rugby union, probably chanting about how ungentlemanly it all was while daring each other to down pints of their own piss. In time this also led to American football and Aussie rules. As afternoons in the pub go it was a productive one.
This is not to say that the game immediately became the sport we know today. When Sheffield FC visited London for a game in 1866 they were roundly mocked for using their heads, which unless the crowd was made up of doctors who specialised in the long term effects of head trauma now seems embarrassingly short-sighted.
A loose version of the offside rule was introduced in 1867 and this led to a host of new tactical innovations. Like passing. Before this the most common tactic was for a player to kick the ball forward and everyone else to charge after it. The exact origins of the passing game are difficult to determine as they provide an early example of England and Scotland’s sporting rivalry. Legend has it that, in 1867, Scotland’s Queen’s Park met to create a style that would give them an advantage over the English, whom they were mostly smaller than. In England the ever-present Sheffield FC and Royal Engineers AFC also lay claim to pioneering this style. If there’s one thing the English and Scots can agree on it’s that the other is wrong. Wherever it started, the new style became known as the Combination Game and, adorably, Scientific Football.
Sheffield continued to innovate, giving the world its first cup competition in the same year. It was stubbornly played under the Sheffield Rules and was won by local side Hallam, who defeated Norfolk by two rouges. Not goals, rouges. The goals in the Youdan Cup format were four yards wide and a rouge was scored if the ball missed the goal but would have gone in had it been twelve yards wide. They were used to settle a game in the event of a draw. People complain that penalties aren’t a fair way to decide a game but they seem a lot fairer than basing the result on what might have happened in a parallel universe.
In 1871 the whole cup thing was attempted again with the first nationally organised competition, the FA Cup. It was an instant success. It was easier to follow as it featured events based solely in this dimension.
This period also saw the first international match. It was set up by an Englishman named C.W. Alcock, who placed an advert in a Glaswegian newspaper challenging the people of Scotland to produce a team to play England. He received no responses. Undeterred, he simply arranged a match with a team of London-based Scots, which England won. He kept putting adverts in newspapers in an attempt to goad players down from Scotland, eventually giving up and instead taking an English team to Glasgow in 1872. This is the first official, FIFA-recognised international. It was a 0–0 draw and, given most of what was to come for both nations, it’s perhaps fitting that nobody won.
Things were at a point where they were getting serious but not yet professional and this was becoming a bone of contention. Those in Scotland and the north of England wanted the game to become professional as they couldn’t afford to take time off work for games, whereas those in the south, where it was a more moneyed pursuit, favoured keeping it amateur. Professionalism won and, in 1888, the Football League was formed by Aston Villa director William McGregor to provide regular competitive matches. Doing nothing for future stereotypes, no sides from the south initially took part, at least being consistent in throwing an entirely unprofessional collective strop.
Such was the popularity of the game among Britons that they began to take it abroad and force it on other people, as they had previously done with imperialism and subsequently with Coldplay. In Switzerland, Lausanne Football and Cricket Club was formed in 1860 by English students doing joint degrees in timekeeping and money laundering, though it’s thought that they began as primarily a cricket club. In France a club is believed to have been founded by the English as early as 1863. A report from The Scotsman said that this team managed to ‘surprise the French amazingly’, though this could have been confusion caused by nearby mimes. They always look surprised. It’s somehow their job.
In Germany Dresden English Football Club was founded in 1874, though the Germans didn’t need the British influence for long. They formed a gigantic amount of amateur local leagues with regional champions then competing in play-offs to reach a national final in a typically rigorous test of a team’s championship credentials. It wouldn’t be until 1963 that the Bundesliga was formed, by which time they’d already won the World Cup. It would be unbelievable were it not so German.
In Italy a man named James Richardson Spensley introduced a football section to Genoa in 1886, who until then had been a cricket club set up to represent England abroad. Chaps on tour, what what! Another outfit, Torino Football and Cricket Club, arrived the next year. Concerned by the gulf in quality between foreign and Italian players, the powers that be split early Italian tournaments into two competitions: the Federal Championship, in which foreign players who lived in Italy could play; and the Italian Championship, in which only Italian players could compete. The Federal Championship’s prize was the Spensley Cup. In 1908 this cup should have been won by Juventus but previous champions AC Milan simply refused to give it to them, confusingly handing it to Genoa rather than keeping it. Thankfully Italy’s football authorities are now a bastion of credibility and have never since been associated with anything so completely and utterly ridiculous.
British workers also introduced the game to Spain. Legend has it that Seville were founded in a café on Burns Night, 1890, by a group of Scottish ex-pats and Spaniards after ‘a deal of talk and a limited consumption of small beer’, in a rare example of British people actually playing down how much they’ve had to drink in Spain.
In Bilbao groups of British steel and shipyard workers and Basque students returning from studying in England formed Bilbao Football Club, who would go on to become Athletic Bilbao. The club now famously employs the cantera policy of allowing only players born in the Basque region to represent the club, in a foreshadowing of future Brits abroad being kicked out of ex-pat bars for no doubt disgraceful behaviour while on holiday. That’s more like it.
Football was taking hold everywhere. The first recorded match outside Europe was played in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1867 between two teams of British merchants. The first match in Brazil was arranged by a Scotsman named Thomas Donohoe in 1894. Soon after that Charles William Miller, the Brazilian-born son of another Scottish immigrant, returned from studying in Southampton armed with some footballs and a rule book. He introduced the game to São Paulo Athletic Club, one of many clubs that played a number of sports, founded a league and installed himself as their main striker. This may seem egotistical but, to be fair to him, they won the first three championships. Sports clubs were common in Brazil and Flamengo’s football team came to exist only because a group of rowers from Fluminense decided they’d rather be footballers. The board told them they couldn’t, not unreasonably, and they presented their proposal to Flamengo, who were fine with the idea. It’s a tactic the modern player can’t be far away from adopting . . .
‘Boss, this season is getting really tough, so I’ve spoken to the lads and we’ve decided to become hoverboard racers instead.’
‘Saido, get off that thing and give me forty press-ups.’
Back in Blighty, the soft southern clubs were still in a huff about all this professionalism balderdash. Everyone else just got on with it. Preston North End were crowned champions of the inaugural Football League in 1889 without losing a game and also won the FA Cup, immediately setting an impossible standard for their sulky southern rivals.
Familiar names were starting to appear. In 1892 a second division was added to the league system. Woolwich Arsenal became the first London club to join the party and would later have the dubious honour of being supported by me. Liverpool entered the league in the same year. Tottenham Hotspur became the only ever non-league FA Cup winners, in 1901. Sheffield continued to be a hotbed of activity, with success coming for The Wednesday, as Sheffield Wednesday were then known, and Sheffield United – not Sheffield FC, in fact suggesting a lack of unity in the city’s footballing circles. Newcastle United and Sunderland AFC were successful while Manchester City looked like they might become a powerhouse only for it to turn out that they’d been paying players £7 a week when the national wage limit was £4. This may not sound like a lot but it was still double what a skilled tradesman could earn. Complaints of footballers earning too much are nothing new. The FA sacked five of their directors and banned four players from ever playing for them again. This was a much harsher punishment than certain clubs receive for financial irregularities now, which basically amount to a framed certificate that says: ‘Don’t do it again £lol.’
International fixtures were also becoming increasingly popular, with the home nations regularly playing each other in highly competitive games. The FA were the only governing body in the world at the time and an invitation was extended to them to become part of a wider, international body. They rejected it out of hand, cocking a snook at such bunkum. Undeterred, the plucky, heroic administrators who’d made this invitation decided to go it alone. It was time for the real heroes of the piece to emerge . . .
FIFA was founded in 1904, when Sepp Blatter was merely a twinkle in the eye of his father, Cthulhu Blatter. The FA would eventually accept FIFA’s authority and join them only to leave again in a further row about professionalism. Great Britain had won Olympic gold in 1908 – fielding only English players – and again in 1912. In 1920 they lost to Norway after selecting a team of amateur players, whereas the Norwegians simply picked the best players they had available, the absolute dicks! The FA wanted the Olympics to remain amateur, FIFA wanted to push on and have a fully professional tournament of their own. The row got so bad that Great Britain didn’t enter teams in the 1924 and 1928 tournaments. Eventually things settled down. Olympic football did remain amateur, for a time, FIFA got their tournament and they and the FA lived happily ever after. Sort of.
The FA certainly were stuffy back then. In 1921 they banned women’s football because: ‘The game of football is quite unsuitable for females and ought not to be encouraged.’ Sadly, attitudes like this were common. In 1931 a Norwegian women’s team, IF Fløya, wrote to the Norwegian FA asking to stage a series of fund-raising games. They received no reply so played one anyway, then swiftly received a haughty response saying: ‘Ladies should not play football . . . the ladies could also get injuries that destroyed their reproductive organs.’ Presumably back then all male Norwegian players had to wear penis guards as the male reproductive organs are at far greater risk.
Some things are more important than football, like massive wars. On 4 August 1914 the First World War broke out, though it wasn’t called that at the time. It later became known as the Great War, which is also inaccurate as by all accounts it was seriously shit for everyone involved. Incredibly the 1914/15 league season and FA Cup were played as normal despite outcry. It was widely believed that if football carried on then men of fighting age would prefer playing or watching it to living in a ditch and being shot at all day and night.
In the end there was, in fact, a whole battalion made up of footballers, called simply the Football Battalion. Bizarrely, they were formed after Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, appealed specifically to footballers to enlist. They were led by one-time Aston Villa player Frank Buckley, who estimated that 500 of the 600 men who originally joined the battalion died. A modern equivalent would roughly be Benedict Cumberbatch convincing Gabby Agbonlahor to sign up to such responsibility. He’s bad enough at closing down defenders.
For the rest of the war the FA suspended the league but allowed clubs to organise regional competitions, with every opportunity taken to convince those taking part to enlist. It became an effective propaganda tool. A children’s football-themed pinball game from the time even featured the strange aim of getting the ‘football’ through the trenches and into Kaiser Wilhelm II’s mouth. That showed him.
On Christmas Day, 1914, arguably the most famous game in history took place as troops from both sides met on no-man’s land during an all too brief truce. The story goes that someone produced a ball from somewhere and a game ensued. Some historians are sceptical but there are accounts from both sides describing something similar. It even seems that this may have happened in a number of places across the battlefield. Soldiers did play behind the lines as a method of staying fit and keeping up morale so it’s entirely possible that there would have been a ball to hand. While it’s impossible to know, it’s safe to assume that if any of these games did take place then Germany would have won. It’s lucky that war can’t go to penalties or the world might be very different.
The war ended in 1918, definitely ending all war for ever, everyone hoped. Football picked up where it had left off. In England the league system continued to expand and, in 1923, Wembley Stadium was opened. The first FA Cup final played there was between West Ham United and Bolton Wanderers and is known as the White Horse Final, not because either side featured a goal-scoring horse but because the match was so overcrowded that police had to intervene and an image of a no doubt confused white police horse was particularly striking. The official attendance was 126,047, with estimates of the actual figure being closer to 300,000. Bolton won 2–0 with many a thrown cap lost in the throng.
One of the scorers on the day, David Jack, would later move to Arsenal to play under one of the innovators of the time. Herbert Chapman won two league titles and one FA Cup with both Huddersfield Town and Arsenal and was one of the first managers to have full control of team affairs. Before this teams had largely been chosen by board members. Chapman also introduced numbered shirts, added hoops to Arsenal’s socks so that the players could pick each other out – crucial in a time when everything was in black and white – and was an early advocate of floodlights, installing them at Highbury in 1932 despite them not being officially sanctioned for use in matches until the 1950s. He was also a pioneer of what might loosely be termed transfer shenanigans. In 1928 he set a world transfer record when he signed Jack from Bolton for £10,890. He held the negotiations in a hotel bar and instructed the staff, whom he knew, to give the Bolton representatives doubles of whatever they ordered while he drank gin and tonic that, in fact, contained no gin. As the Bolton men got increasingly drunk Chapman used the advantage of his sobriety to haggle them down to a price he considered to be a bargain. It was all a bit of a lark, and possibly a crime.
The first World Cup took place in 1930 in Uruguay. England refused to take part, believing it beneath them, and Uruguay went on to win it. The second World Cup took place in 1934 in Italy. England refused to take part, believing it beneath them, and Italy went on to win it. The third World Cup took place in 1938 in France. England refused to take part, by now probably realising that they should but not wanting to look silly, and Italy went on to win it, again. There would not be another until 1950 because, in 1939, that absolute prick Adolf Hitler rolled into Poland and the Second World War began. Football was officially suspended in September 1939, all players had their contracts terminated and the majority of clubs shut down. Regional leagues were set up to keep some semblance of the game running but few even completed a season. Stadiums were even repurposed to aid the war effort. Arsenal’s Highbury was used as an Air Raid Precautions centre so they and Tottenham Hotspur had to share a ground in just one of the many tragedies of war.
Perhaps the most famous story of football in World War Two is that of the ‘Death Match’ involving FC Start, a team made up of former players from Dynamo and Lokomotiv Kyiv. There are many versions of the story, including one that features Sylvester Stallone in goal if the movie Escape to Victory is to be believed. What does seem clear is that the Start players worked in a bakery under occupation and beat a Nazi side called Flakelf 5–1. A rematch was ordered. The most well-known version of the story says that during the half-time break the players were threatened with execution should they win. Defiant, they won 5–3. One Start player rounded the German keeper, stopped the ball on the goal-line, turned around and kicked it back down the pitch in a show of contempt. Days later the players were arrested and shot. Various accounts say that there were no such threats and that, though some of the players were later arrested, this was not as a result of the match. Regardless, many were sent to camps and whatever the truth it makes a wet and windy, clichéd night in Stoke seem comparatively appealing.
The world took time to recover and so did football, naturally, it being part of said world. In 1950 the first post-war World Cup was held in Brazil, with Uruguay victorious in a final the hosts assumed they would win. Their disappointment led to what can only be described as a state of mourning, with some distraught fans even committing suicide. The experience gave rise to a phenomenon called the Phantom of ’50, a fear of failure that strikes Brazil when they face Uruguay. Amongst it all a young Pelé promised his tearful father that he would win the World Cup for Brazil, which eight years later he did.
Despite not winning their maiden World Cup, England still considered themselves to be the global leaders of the game. This idea would come under intense scrutiny in 1953 when they hosted Hungary at Wembley. Known as the Mighty Magyars, the Hungarians were ranked first in the world but England, then third, had never lost to a team from outside the British Isles at home. The press dubbed it the Match of the Century. Hungary scored in the first minute. With twenty-seven minutes gone they were 4–1 up and they went on to win 6–3. Upper lips unstiffened, mouths sat agape and pipes teetered redundantly upon them. England had suffered a right old bamboozling and no mistake! It wouldn’t happen again, though. They organised a rematch, in Hungary, only this time they’d be ready for the Magyars and their fancy tactics! They lost 7–1. It’s said that the English players simply weren’t as technically competent with the ball as their foreign counterparts, the correction of which the FA will be getting around to any day now.
At a stretch England could actually lay some claim to have influenced the style that had so roundly beaten them. An Englishman named Jimmy Hogan had been coaching in Austria when the First World War broke out and then spent time coaching the Hungarian side MTK. He was known as a tactical innovator and his methods helped shape the football Hungary later played, itself a precursor to the Total Football that would later emerge. For his efforts abroad he was seen by some as a traitor. Great work everyone. Sándor Barcs, president of the Hungarian Football Federation, said after the game: ‘Jimmy Hogan taught us everything we know about football . . . When our football history is told his name should be written in gold letters.’ That Jimmy Hogan is largely unheard of is probably Barcs’s fault. Gold lettering is prohibitively expensive. Sorry Jimmy, you’re just having normal ink here, but well done all the same.
In 1948 Chile hosted the Campeonato Sudamericano de Campeones, or ‘South American Championship of Champions’ in English, which sounds lame and slightly wacky in comparison to its suave Spanish cousin. It was the precursor to the Copa Libertadores. French journalist Jacques Ferran was covering it for the newspaper L’Equipe and hit on the idea of doing exactly the same thing in Europe. UEFA loved the idea and with the trademark speed they still display today the first European Cup kicked off in 1955, a mere seven years later. Hibernian, made the semi-finals but the FA refused to allow England’s champions, Chelsea, to enter, reasoning that it could be bad for English football in general. In the short term they may have had a point. Real Madrid kept up a tradition left over from the days of the Franco regime by murdering everybody, winning the first five. They were finally defeated in Europe by Barcelona in the first round of the 1961 competition. Their fierce rivals would go all the way to the final before losing to Benfica at the Wankdorf Stadium in Bern, which it is absolutely necessary to mention here. European football became truly continental.
The fifties had been a tough time for English football. As well as international humblings from Hungary and the USA, the Munich air disaster claimed the lives of twenty-three people when Manchester United were returning from a European Cup match with Red Star Belgrade in 1958. Many of those who died were part of the team known as the ‘Busby Babes’, owing to manager Matt Busby’s influence in ushering through the talented young players who made up much of the squad. They’d been expected to dominate for years to come. Recovery would be a long and difficult process.
English teams did begin to have some success in Europe, with Spurs becoming the first English team to win a European trophy with their Cup-Winners’ Cup triumph in 1963. Two years earlier Spurs had become the first English side in the twentieth century to win the league and cup double. That year, 1961, was significant also because it marked the end to the cap on footballers’ wages. Jimmy Hill, then head of the players’ union, the PFA, had campaigned hard for this and the impact was immediate. So immediate that Hill’s then Fulham team-mate Johnny Haynes became the first £100-a-week player (up from £20 a week) within hours of the rules changing. I hope he at least bought Hill a pint afterwards.
In international football 1960 brought the introduction of the European Championship, just forty-four years after those crazy, disorganised South Americans held their first Copa América. The four-team tournament was won by the Soviet Union. Brazil then won their second consecutive World Cup, in 1962, and in a little-remembered piece of classic pub quiz trivia England actually won the World Cup on home soil in 1966. This was obviously huge for England as, until this point, we’d been telling everyone that we were the best in the world at this game and we now finally had the proof to back it up. It still resonates now because we’re part of a select few who’ve actually won the World Cup and it feels like if we did it once we can do it again . . . right? We’re going to win it again before I die, right? Please? Oh God, please let us actually win something else one day.
In European club competitions, Spain, Portugal and Italy dominated until 1967, when Celtic beat Internazionale to became the first British club to win the European Cup. Inter went 1–0 up with a seventh-minute penalty then set up to defend for the rest of the game, employing their famous catenaccio style. Undeterred, Celtic had a massive forty-three attempts on goal, eventually winning 2–1. All but one of the fifteen players in their squad had been born within ten miles of Celtic Park and the team earned the nickname of the Lisbon Lions. It is just one of many examples of football’s weird obsession with comparing men to lions. Lions and eagles. You’d think they were the only hard creatures. The under representation of bears and sharks in particular is yet another illustration of how football still has a way to go before it can consider itself truly inclusive.
A year later the 1968 European Cup final was contested between Benfica and Matt Busby’s Manchester United, ten years on from the tragedy of Munich. Survivors Bobby Charlton and Bill Foulkes featured and United also had a 22-year-old George Best in the team. They beat the Portuguese side 4–1 at Wembley. If the events of 1958 were a reminder that football is ultimately unimportant, 1968 was a reminder that it can still be incredibly powerful.