cover
PRAISE FOR ONE KING
One King constitutes one of the best reads I have yet seen on this most critical issue. It has shown how the ancient promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, with its three key divine promises, dominates the redemptive plan of God all the way through Scripture, showing at once the priority of sharing the Gospel with Israel and Israel’s call and election to bless all the nations of the earth. My only wish is that this book may fall into the hands of every serious Bible student and pastor. I highly recommend this book to the blessing of all who want to get the biblical story right.
—DR. WALTER C. KAISER, JR.
President Emeritus, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
Whether we like it or not, until Jesus returns, the controversy of Zion is only going to increase in its relevance, prominence, and impact, forcing itself onto all of us. Understanding this, it is imperative that responsible Christians take the time to gain a solid understanding of the underlying biblical foundation of this controversy. Samuel Whitefield is one of the clearest thinkers on these matters. During an age when the writings of many Christians bring more fog than clarity, One King is a crisp breath of clean air.
—JOEL RICHARDSON
New York Times best-selling author, speaker, and filmmaker
Samuel Whitefield has written a powerful book on Israel and its destiny. He handles the Scriptures with accuracy and provides a very compelling overall framework. Those who struggle with new presentations that deny ethnic Israel an important place in the plan of God and its inheritance in their ancient Land would do well to read this book.
—DR. DANIEL JUSTER
Author and Founder, Tikkun International
Israel is mentioned over 2500 times in the Scripture. An improper understanding of this most important theme will lead to an improper understanding of Scripture. I highly recommend One King, as it will challenge the reader to grapple with God’s heart and plan for Israel’s past, present, and future.
—SCOTT VOLK
Founder, Together for Israel
Without a doubt there are historic and emerging controversies in the body of Christ surrounding the subject of Israel and the church, and writings like this are so helpful to God’s people during this hour! Samuel Whitefield is unafraid to dive into the tensions regarding Israel and the nations, while at the same time bringing clarity and confidence to the reader about the vision that Scripture gives for the people and the land of Israel. One King will inspire your heart and open your eyes to the invitation the church has in this hour to enter into the storyline of Israel’s salvation and redemption in our generation … exciting!
—JIM STERN
Lead Pastor, Destiny Church, Saint Louis
We are living in a time when the controversy concerning Israel and the destiny of the Jewish people is increasing. This is a subject with many conflicting sentiments and opinions. Yet Paul tells us that it is imperative for the church to grow in the knowledge of God by understanding God’s eternal plan (mystery) concerning Israel. Samuel Whitefield, with excellent skill and insight, makes the subject accessible and returns it to its proper context where it belongs—the gospel of the kingdom.
—STUART GREAVES
Senior leadership team, IHOPKC
Christians are increasingly being forced to ask the question of how they should relate to modern Israel through a New Testament and gospel-centered lens. That question requires us to understand how the New Testament understood Old Testament promises and the nature of the Kingdom of God. This question is increasingly inescapable and has serious implications for how we understand the mission of the church in our generation, especially the mission to the Muslim world. It is important that we get this issue right and that we take a gospel-centered approach, and this is one of the best resources I can recommend on the subject.
—DR. JOSHUA LINGEL
President, World Apologetics and Discipleship Institute Founder and President, i2 Ministries
ONE
KING
title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To the King who gave Himself for us when we were still His enemies.
May this work in some small way cause the nations to love Him more.
Contents
Foreword
Introduction
Part 1
The Basis of the Gospel—Abraham’s Promise
1God’s Promises to Abraham
2The Progression of the Promises in the Old Testament
3The New Testament Affirmation of the Promises
4Abraham’s Promises Have Not Been Fulfilled
Part 2
The New Testament and the People of God
5Israel’s Promises and the Body of Jesus
6The New Testament, the People of God, and Israel
Part 3
Understanding the Election of Israel
7Paul’s Dilemma and God’s Election
8Israel’s Historical Challenge with God’s Election
9The Challenge of Election
10Paul’s View of Israel’s Election
Part 4
Israel’s Future in the New Testament
11The Fulfillment of Israel’s Promises in the New Testament
12Is AD 70 the End of Israel’s Story?
Part 5
The Kingdom
13King Jesus
14The King of Israel and the Nations
Part 6
The Church, the Jewish People, and the Modern State of Israel
15The Church and the Jewish People
16The Complexity of the Modern State
Acknowledgments
Bibliography
FOREWORD
The establishment of the modern State of Israel in the aftermath of the Holocaust produced theological shockwaves throughout the church. First, there was the theological shockwave of the Holocaust itself, since the mass slaughter of European Jews could not have taken place without centuries of “Christian” anti-Semitism in Europe. And it was replacement theology—the teaching that the church was the New Israel and that it had replaced the old Israel in God’s scheme of salvation—that opened the door to this plague of church-sponsored anti-Semitism. Second, there was now irrefutable proof that God’s promises for Israel remained and that the church had not, in fact, replaced Israel, since the Jewish people were now back in the land with their own sovereign state.
In the years that followed, culminating in 1967 with the Six-Day War and Israel’s recapture of the Old City of Jerusalem, it seemed clear to many Christians that God had indeed restored His people back to their ancestral homeland and that Old Testament prophecies were literally coming to pass.
But things are changing now. 1948 was a long time ago; even 1967 was a long time ago. Where is the culmination of God’s plan? If the rebirth of the nation of Israel is an end-time marker, why hasn’t Jesus returned yet? And since Israel seems to have as many shortcomings as any other nation, why should the church stand with Israel rather than with the Palestinians? Could it be that the rebirth of Israel really wasn’t such an important scriptural event? Could it be that Israel is just like any other nation, meaning that, while Jews can be saved like any other individuals, no national promises remain for the people of Israel as a whole? Could some form of replacement theology be true, be it called fulfillment theology or expansion theology or something else?
Through a careful and systematic study of hundreds of relevant verses, Samuel Whitefield comes to four irresistible conclusions: 1) God always keeps His promises; 2) there are promises that remain for national Israel; 3) God will fulfill these promises based on His righteousness rather than Israel’s righteousness; and 4) those promises to Israel include both national salvation and physical restoration to the land.
In a study of this kind where so much Scripture is discussed, readers might come to different conclusions about specific points of exegesis. But Samuel builds a devastatingly clear case because, in my judgment, the Word itself builds a devastatingly clear case, and it is the cumulative evidence of Samuel’s exegesis that I refer to as “irresistible.”
What I find particularly edifying about this study is: 1) the focus on Jesus—the One King of the title—in whom everything is centered; and 2) the recognition that God’s purposes for Israel include a massive harvest of Gentiles. Israel’s redemption is the redemption of the world, and Israel’s redemption—and identity and purpose and meaning—is found in Jesus the Messiah.
This book, then, calls every believer to recognize the importance of God’s purposes of Israel, explaining why there is such massive controversy over the Jewish people having their own state on their ancient homeland. And it reminds us that the battle is ultimately a spiritual battle, meaning that God wants the entire church to work together in prayer for Israel’s ultimate salvation, a salvation that ties in directly with the return to earth of that glorious King.
Samuel himself has spent many hours in prayer for Israel, and this book was birthed out of prayer. May this study stir the hearts of many believers, especially in this younger generation, to give themselves to prayer and intercession for the Jewish people as well, and may that intercession be built on the rock-solid theological foundations found in the pages that follow.
I echo the words of Paul that “all Israel shall be saved” (Romans 11:26)!
 
Michael L. Brown, PhD
image
As the redemptive story unfolds in the Bible, it sets our hope on a King and His kingdom. This kingdom is ultimately associated with a place—Zion. Zion enters the Bible as a small mountain in Jerusalem, a stronghold taken by David and subsequently associated with the City of David. Mount Zion in Jerusalem comes to be a symbol for the glory of David’s reign as a prophetic picture of a coming Messiah who will be King.
In the Psalms we find majestic descriptions of Zion that go far beyond David’s reign, and the glory of Zion’s future is set forth as the hope of the nation. After David’s reign, the prophets elaborate on this hope. They describe a future day when Mount Zion is the most glorious mountain on the earth and the dwelling place of God. Zion quickly becomes something far bigger than the small mountain David conquered. The glory of this future Zion becomes deeply connected with God’s work of redemption, and its future glory becomes one of God’s promises to the people of God.
With the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70 and the subsequent Diaspora, the hope represented by Zion shifted primarily to the hope of heaven. With that shift the word Zion began to take on a universal meaning: a type of shorthand reference for God’s universal rule over creation. Because the predictions of Zion’s future glory are so grand, this shift seemed to make sense, and most Christians think of Zion in terms of the heavenly kingdom of God, as the concept of Zion became separated from its earthly beginnings.
Key to the question of how we understand Zion is the question of how we understand Israel. For centuries, the church has wrestled with the question of how she and “Israel” relate to one another. Throughout church history, most Christians have assumed God replaced Israel with her—with the church, that is—and God is no longer committed to a literal fulfillment of the promises He made to the Jewish people. Zion remained our hope, but Zion became divorced from Israel. However, a number of key events in the twentieth century have forced Christians to reconsider how we understand both God’s promises to Israel and His global mission that began after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem.
The first of these key events was the Holocaust. The Holocaust was one of those shocking events that challenge all our understanding of what it means to be human. As the historian Robert Wistrich said, “Staring into the Holocaust is like staring into an abyss and hoping it doesn’t stare back.”1 While the Holocaust is processed many ways, it is rarely processed theologically, but the reality is that it had immense theological implications. If God were “finished” with the Jewish people, then why, after two thousand years, was a madman’s attempt at their extermination one of the most defining events of the twentieth century?
The second key event was the establishment of the modern state of Israel in 1948. From its very beginning, the modern state has been a global controversy and has created a theological controversy, too. Though it is essentially a secular democracy, the fact that a Jewish Israel emerged after two thousand years of absence has caused the church to reexamine everything it thought about Israel and to ask serious questions about how modern Israel relates to ancient Israel, the Bible, and the modern church. In our generation, the controversy that began in 1948 continues to escalate.
The third key event was the expansion of the gospel throughout the nations to the point where, for the first time in history, it is possible that the gospel may be preached to every people group within our lifetime. The preaching of the gospel to every people is one of the key milestones in global missions (see Matthew 24:14; Revelation 5:9; 7:9). The fact that this milestone is now within reach forces us to examine the gospel mission in light of Paul’s conviction in Romans that the success of the gospel in the nations ultimately exists for the provocation of Israel and for her salvation:
So I ask, did they stumble in order that they might fall? By no means! Rather through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean! Now I am speaking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch then as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry in order somehow to make my fellow Jews jealous, and thus save some of them. For if their rejection means the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead? (Romans 11:11–15)
Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob.” (vv. 25–26)
If the success of the gospel in the nations is ultimately intended to bring salvation to Israel, how then do we understand the present condition of Israel and the ultimate aim of God’s mission to the Gentiles?
As the church has been forced to reexamine the relationship between Israel and the nations, there are serious questions that must be answered:
How do we reconcile the promises made to the Jewish people with the expansion of the gospel to the Gentiles that is so clear in the New Testament?
How does a modern, secular Israel—frequently referred to in terms of “Zionism”—relate to the saved Israel the Bible speaks about? Is there any connection at all?
How do Old Testament promises relate to a New Testament church?
Who are the people of God?
How are the biblical promises of Zion fulfilled?
Because the Bible presents the kingship of Messiah in the context of Israel and her salvation, the emergence of modern Israel also raises a couple of related questions:
What does it ultimately mean that Jesus is King both of Israel and the nations?
How do we understand Jesus’ kingdom and its relationship to Israel?
What does it mean to have a Jesus-centered view of Israel and of Zion?
More and more, believers across the earth recognize Israel is of great significance, not just in the past, but also in the present and the future. At the same time, many are wrestling with how to reconcile Israel’s importance with the real transitions that take place in the New Testament. The key to understanding this biblical tension is realizing that the first coming of Jesus did not fulfill most of the Bible’s promises. What His first coming did was secure those promises, making their fulfillment possible in the future. Many promises that the church assumed for generations were fulfilled are in fact promises that remain to be fulfilled in the future by the glorious return of Jesus. Examining all that this means helps us to understand what is meant by Zion and where our future hope really lies.
If we remove the artificial divide between the Old and New Testaments, we can be faithful and loyal to the gospel and the great transition the New Testament brings, while also being faithful to Paul’s exhortation that the gospel mission in the nations would ultimately end in the salvation of the Jewish people. When we view the Old Testament and New Testament together, we can both recognize and celebrate the unique election of the Jewish people and the offer to the Gentiles to be full members of the people of God, because Jesus is both the King of Israel and the King of the Nations.
To understand how Israel and the nations are joined in God’s plan, we have first to reexamine Old Testament foundations and recognize how deeply Paul’s gospel is rooted in the Old Testament. The Old Testament is not simply part of our history. It contains the theological foundations of the New Testament gospel. Not only is the Old Testament the foundation of our gospel, it ultimately declares specific promises that have not yet been fulfilled—promises that are driving where redemptive history is going.
As the crisis of Israel increases and the mission to every people group nears completion, it is going to become even more critical that the global church clearly understands both the original foundations of the gospel in the Old Testament that remain in force and exactly how the first coming of Jesus shifted the trajectory of redemptive history. In order to understand these two things, we have first to examine where Paul’s gospel begins in the Old Testament and then examine how the New Testament teaches the promises to Israel and the nations will be fulfilled by God’s King. The controversy of Israel, and of Zion, is not going away. We must have a Jesus-centered answer to Zion and the people of God.
1R. S. Wistrich, Hitler and the Holocaust. (New York City: Modern Library, 2001), 18.
PART 1
THE BASIS OF THE GOSPEL—ABRAHAM’S PROMISE
image
GOD’S PROMISES TO ABRAHAM
GLOBAL CRISIS
Genesis 1 opens with the well-known phrase, “In the beginning,” as it begins to describe both what happened to put the earth in the condition it is in and how God intends to redeem the earth. After briefly describing creation, Genesis 1 through 11 sets the stage for God’s plan for world redemption. It tells us how sin and tragedy were introduced into the human experience. As time passes, we see the full effects of humanity’s sin, as humanity’s situation grows increasingly grim. Families are destroyed. Sons are murdered, and not long into the story, wickedness escalates so rapidly that God releases a global flood to stop its growth. Even after the flood, the earth is still left in a crisis because, while the flood swept away most of humanity, it was unable to resolve the issues in the human heart that caused the crisis in the first place. No leader, even Noah, ultimately is capable of redeeming humanity. The earth needs a new leader, a new “Adam,” to redeem and restore the human race.
Genesis 11 describes a pivotal event in early human history that serves to illustrate the human condition. While the flood is still a recent memory, humankind decides to set up a challenge to God’s authority on the plains of Shinar. Construction begins on a tower that is intended to give humanity access to spiritual power in an effort to challenge the One who flooded the earth. In this pivotal moment, God steps in and breaks the power of humankind by separating the people through confounding their speech. Thus begins the story of the nations of the earth.
However, the crisis of the nations is not the only story of Genesis. There is also a promise of redemption. Beginning with Genesis 3:15, God promises that Someone is coming who will redeem and restore the human race. The same God who creates the nations in Genesis 11, also promises ultimately to redeem them. To do this, God sets a plan into motion in Genesis 12, choosing one man who will become the father of one particular nation. He will use this man Abraham in a pivotal way in His plan to redeem all the nations.
GOD’S PROMISES TO ABRAHAM
There is a tendency to consider the Old Testament something that is only part of history, something that has been completely superseded by the New Testament. However, that is not true.
While the New Testament does say the law given to Moses is passing away, it does not say the entire Old Testament is passing away. That means we need to understand the covenants of the Old Testament and recognize what is temporary and what is permanent. One of the most important of these covenants is the covenant made with Abraham, because the Bible presents it as both a permanent covenant and an unconditional covenant. In fact, Paul uses this covenant as the entire basis of the gospel. While the gospel teaches that the law of Moses is passing away, it clearly teaches that the covenant with Abraham is not passing away at all but, instead, is the foundation of the gospel.
The Abrahamic covenant is the source of righteousness by faith as it is written in Genesis 15:6 that Abraham believed God and He “counted it to him as righteousness” (see also Romans 4:3). It is the very foundation of the promise of redemption, for the apostle Paul said,
Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ. This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void. For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise. (Galatians 3:16–18)
And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise. (v. 29)
Jesus is the means by which the promises to Abraham are fulfilled. While the law must pass away, Abraham’s promises must not pass away because they are the very basis of the gospel, and Jesus remains committed to fulfilling them. Therefore, to understand the work of Jesus and ultimately His kingdom, we must understand these promises because Jesus has been made King in order to fulfill them.
These promises undergird the entire story of redemption in this age and create a great tension throughout the biblical narrative as prophets predict their fulfillment and, at the same time, wonder how God will ever bring them to fulfillment. The first step to understanding what Jesus will do as King is understanding these promises and what the Bible says about God’s commitment to fulfilling them.
GOD’S THREE PROMISES IN GENESIS 12
In Genesis 12, God begins to give shape and definition to His redemptive plan. He begins by calling out Abraham and giving him very specific promises. He says to Abraham,
Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed. (Genesis 12:1–3)
God makes three very distinct promises to Abraham here. Each of these is important to recognize because the promises are key components of God’s redemptive plan and all three—the promise of land, the promise of descendants, and the promise to the nations—must be fulfilled by His chosen King.
THE PROMISE OF LAND
First, God promises Abraham a specific land. In Genesis 12:1, He tells Abraham to go “to the land” that He “will show” him. The whole context of the promise is that Abraham is sent to a new land intended for him to possess. He will not simply dwell in this new place; he will ultimately inherit it with his descendants. “‘To your offspring I will give this land’” (Genesis 12:7).1 Abraham and his physical descendants must inherit the land for the promise to be fulfilled.
The land is presented to Abraham as a permanent inheritance. So, for this promise to be fulfilled, Abraham’s descendants must dwell permanently in the land. The inheritance is also promised specifically to Abraham (see Genesis 15:8), whom we know never owned the land, thus creating tension. If God’s promises are true, then how is it that Abraham never saw the fulfillment of them? If Abraham’s death is the end of God’s promises to him, the promise of the land is forever unfulfilled because Abraham never inherited the land nor did he live to see his descendants inherit it.
The book of Hebrews describes this dilemma when it tells the story of the great men and women of faith. One of the indications of their great faith was that they remained faithful even when they did not receive in their lifetimes what God had promised them.
These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. (Hebrews 11:13)
And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect. (vv. 39–40)
To understand the redemptive story, we have to understand what the author of Hebrews expressed in Hebrews 11. The redemptive story is deeply connected. God’s promises to the patriarchs remain unfulfilled because it has always been in God’s heart to join His people together across time and then to bring the fulfillment of all that He has promised, as we see in the last verses of the chapter.
If Abraham did not receive his promise in his lifetime, and God’s Word is true, then there must come a time in the future when Abraham is raised from the dead so that the promise can be fulfilled in exact detail according to how it was spoken. Abraham cannot inherit his promises as a dead man, so the dilemma of his unfulfilled promises must mean that a time will come in the future when God will raise Abraham (and the rest of the patriarchs) from the dead and fulfill His promises. This means that the hope of the resurrection, which is so central in the New Testament, was central in God’s redemptive plan from the very beginning. This is not to say that Abraham would have completely understood or expected this, but his willingness to sacrifice Isaac in Genesis 22 shows that he did understand God would raise the dead if necessary to fulfill His promises. Only as the redemptive story develops throughout the Scripture does it become apparent that God’s promises to the patriarchs were not fulfilled in their lifetimes. In later chapters, we will see that the New Testament anticipates a future fulfillment of Abraham’s promises.
THE PROMISE OF DESCENDANTS
Abraham is also promised that he will have descendants. God says, “I will make of you a great nation,” in Genesis 12:2. The promise implies that the people will be a righteous people because Abraham is told that this great nation will make his name great. The people called by Abraham’s name can only make his name great in the earth if they are a righteous people in the eyes of God. In other words, this statement refers to quality as well as quantity. Righteousness is what makes a nation great, not merely its large population (see Proverbs 14:34).
Abraham will be a blessing to the earth because the nation that flows from him will be a blessing to all the earth. Again, this enforces the prediction that the nation coming from him will be righteous. In biblical thinking, the unrighteous are cut off from the earth (see Psalm 37), but Abraham is promised the exact opposite—descendants who make his name great!
THE PROMISE TO THE NATIONS
Abraham also receives a promise for the nations of the earth. In Genesis 12:3, God promises him that all the nations of the earth will receive blessing through His plan to make a great nation from Abraham’s descendants. The first two promises are specific to Abraham’s natural descendants, but it is important to recognize that God promises, from the beginning, that His plan for Abraham will be a great blessing to all the nations. Galatians 3:8 and other New Testament passages tell us that this blessing is the offer of salvation to the Gentiles.2 The idea, then, of gentile salvation is not a new idea originating in the New Testament. Instead, we find it right here in the original promise made to Abraham.
God is going to bring blessing to all the people of the earth, every tribe and tongue, in the process of fulfilling the first two promises He made to Abraham. From the beginning, God is committed to the nations, and their salvation and Israel’s salvation are deeply intertwined.
THE WARNING OF CONTROVERSY
Having then made these three promises to Abraham, God says something interesting. He tells Abraham that He “will bless those who bless” Abraham and curse those who dishonor him (Genesis 12:3). Dishonor is translated curse in the New American Standard Bible and treats you lightly in the New English Translation. A curse as a consequence serves as a sober warning to Abraham that God’s plan is going to be controversial in the nations. There will be individuals who agree with and bless God’s plan by blessing Abraham, and there will be those individuals who curse or treat Abraham lightly because of how God chooses to fulfill His three promises to him.
Because this verse ends with, “and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed,” it indicates that the salvation of the nations will ultimately be connected to how they relate to Abraham or to God’s plan to fulfill all three promises. The nations are warned it will be easy to take offense at God’s plan; however, they are also told that blessing God’s plan through blessing Abraham is the way to receive the blessing that will flow through God’s plan to them—to all the nations of the earth. This is the very same thing the apostle Paul said when he told the gentile believers in Rome to not be arrogant toward the unsaved Jewish people (see Romans 11:20, 23–27).
All three promises are tied together and will be fulfilled together. The nations will receive blessing and salvation in the way God accomplishes His plan to make the Jewish people a great people who permanently inherit a land and who, by way of receiving their promises, will bless the nations. The Jewish people cannot receive their full inheritance unless the nations come into the blessing of salvation, but the nations cannot receive their full blessing without the Jewish people receiving salvation and a land inheritance.3 These three promises are three strands of one cord. God will not fulfill only one without the other. All three of them must be fulfilled, and because of the way they are interdependent all three will come to their complete fulfillment at the same time.
Right there, in Genesis 12, we find the three core promises that drive God’s redemptive plan: 1) Abraham will have descendants who will become a righteous nation, 2) those descendants will permanently inherit a land, and 3) the nations will receive blessing and salvation through the process. These three promises become the foundation of God’s mission in the world and are reiterated throughout the biblical narrative.
In Galatians, Paul tells us plainly that Abraham received the essence of the gospel in Genesis 12.
And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.” (Galatians 3:8)
Paul tells us that Genesis 12 predicts both justification by faith and the salvation of the Gentiles. Note carefully how Paul makes his case about the salvation of the Gentiles. He does not apply Abraham’s first two promises to the Gentiles; instead, he notes the promise to the Gentiles was always in the covenant made with Abraham, as was righteousness by faith. Paul recognizes God was intentional from the beginning of His redemptive work to plainly state that the Gentiles would receive great blessing from His covenant with Abraham. Since Paul recognizes the promise made to the Gentiles as a literal promise, then it makes sense for us to take literally the other promises to Abraham’s descendants as well—especially in light of Abraham’s encounter with God in Genesis 15.
ABRAHAM’S COVENANT ENCOUNTER IN GENESIS 15
The encounter between God and Abraham in Genesis 15 is one of the great covenantal encounters in the Bible. It is an important chapter because there is nothing else like it in the Word. God only enters into covenant a few times in the Bible, and each one is incredibly significant. It is also important to understand this chapter because Paul’s basis for salvation by faith is this covenant encounter between God and Abraham: “‘Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness’” (Romans 4:3, quoting Genesis 15:6). Abraham’s encounter is not simply an Old Testament story, then; it is the foundation for our New Testament faith.
We are saved by faith because Abraham secured his promise by faith. Our promise of salvation is secure only to the extent that Abraham’s promise is secure. Furthermore, it follows that our salvation is connected to God’s covenant with Abraham. Paul interprets Genesis 15 as the basis of God’s ongoing covenant with people. God’s agreement with Abraham is not something that has passed away, but it is something that Jesus has secured.
In this chapter, Abraham asks God if He intends to fulfill the promise made in Genesis 12. Abraham only addresses two of the promises—the promises of descendants and land—but the covenant encounter of Genesis 15 is God’s confirmation of what He spoke in Genesis 12, which means all three promises are ultimately confirmed by the covenant act.
The encounter begins as Abraham expresses his pain to God and asks for assurance that the promises of Genesis 12 will be fulfilled literally.
But Abram said, “O Lord God, what will you give me, for I continue childless, and the heir of my house is Eliezer of Damascus?” And Abram said, “Behold, you have given me no offspring, and a member of my household will be my heir.” (Genesis 15:2–3)
And he said to him, “I am the Lord who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to possess.” But he said, “O Lord God, how am I to know that I shall possess it?” (vv. 7–8)
Abraham is in pain because God made him a promise, but Abraham cannot see any way for the promise to come to pass. He cannot have one son, much less many descendants, and he is also wandering the land he is supposed to possess. It is important to understand the entire context of the covenant encounter. The key question is whether or not the promises will be fulfilled literally. Abraham is concerned that another brought into his house will inherit his promise instead of his physical son. To use New Testament language, Abraham is concerned that someone grafted into his family will fulfill the promise of a son. God emphasizes the literalness of the promise. Yes, there will be billions, like Abraham’s servant, who will be grafted into Abraham’s house and receive blessing. However, the promise given to Abraham will have a literal fulfillment in his descendants.
In the conversation, God repeats and affirms both His promises from chapter 12:
And behold, the word of the Lord came to him: “This man shall not be your heir; your very own son shall be your heir.” And he brought him outside and said, “Look toward heaven, and number the stars, if you are able to number them.” Then he said to him, “So shall your offspring be.” (Genesis 15:4–5)
And he said to him, “I am the Lord who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to possess.” (v. 7)
After verbally confirming His promise, God enters into covenant with Abraham in a covenant ceremony during which He fully commits to perform the promises:
He said to him, “Bring me a heifer three years old, a female goat three years old, a ram three years old, a turtledove, and a young pigeon.” And he brought him all these, cut them in half, and laid each half over against the other. But he did not cut the birds in half. And when birds of prey came down on the carcasses, Abram drove them away. As the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell on Abram. And behold, dreadful and great darkness fell upon him. (Genesis 15:9–12)
When the sun had gone down and it was dark, behold, a smoking fire pot and a flaming torch passed between these pieces. On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, “To your offspring I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates, the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites and the Jebusites.” (vv. 17–21)
There are several key components of the covenant ceremony that we have to recognize. The first is its cultural significance. The ceremony was based on an ancient method of making an agreement. In this ancient ceremony, two individuals would walk between split animals to make a public statement of their commitment. The commitment was that it should be done to them as it was done to the animals if they should break their agreement. God wanted to assure Abraham that this was a permanent agreement by using an ancient ceremony that Abraham understood.
Second, God did not allow Abraham to contribute to the performance of the covenant. Though the covenant was made with Abraham, when it was time to make covenant, God put Abraham into a deep sleep, leaving him unable to contribute to the covenant ceremony. This happened because Abraham’s righteousness came from faith. Faith, or confidence in God’s Word, was the only thing that God allowed Abraham to contribute.
Third, two parties had to walk through the sacrifices to make the covenant, but instead of God and Abraham walking through it together, God walks through it. This is one of the most interesting events in Scripture. There is not a third party to the covenant. It is between Abraham and God, yet Abraham sees two manifestations of God, a flaming torch and a smoking fire pot (some translations say “oven”), moving through the animals together.
What does this signify? Only God made covenant with Abraham, yet he saw two manifestations walk through the animals in the covenant ceremony. In the New Testament, we see the intimate partnership between the Father and the Son in the work of redemption. In light of later Scripture, we can recognize that the two manifestations of God that Abraham sees represent the Father and Son walking through the sacrifices. This means the Father and Jesus made a commitment to each other to fulfill the promises made to Abraham. This is significant because, if Abraham had been allowed to walk through with God, then Abraham’s ability would determine whether the covenant failed or succeeded, since because he would be committing his strength to keep it. God knew Abraham’s weakness, so He guaranteed the covenant Himself. He knew that Abraham’s sin, and the sin of his descendants, would break the covenant. That is why the Son walked through with the Father, committing Himself to be sacrificed like the split animals in order to ensure the success of the covenant. This emphasizes the permanence of the covenant and God’s commitment to it. This was more than a symbolic promise; it was also a prophetic act. Because of Abraham’s sin, and the sin of his descendants, the reality is the Son would be sacrificed like the animals. That future sacrifice would permanently secure the covenant.
God’s commitment to fulfilling the promises He made to Abraham in Genesis 12 is on full display in Genesis 15. The dramatic covenant ceremony emphasizes that Abraham’s righteousness has no part to play in the fulfillment of the promises. God Himself will secure the promises with His own righteousness. This is one of the key themes of the promises made to Abraham: the promises are neither threatened nor secured by Abraham’s ability to obey. They are promises God made to a man and committed Himself to fulfill. There is a reason that Paul understood righteousness by faith from this chapter. He understood God’s commitment to fulfilling these three promises through His own strength.
To understand God’s redemptive plan, it is important to recognize these key differences between this covenant and the Mosaic law, where God laid out requirements, with blessings and curses, and the outcome of the agreement was based on the people’s performance. These key differences are why Paul says that the suffering, death, and resurrection of Jesus has caused one to pass away (Sinai) and another to be guaranteed (Abraham) forever.
1God’s initial promises to Abraham make the land promise clear. See also Genesis 15:7, 8, 18.
2See Acts 10:45; 13:47–48; 15:12; 26:23; Romans 11:11; Galatians 3:8, 14.
3See Romans 11:12–15.
image
THE PROGRESSION OF THE PROMISES IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
THE REAFFIRMATION OF THE PROMISE IN GENESIS 28
In Genesis 28, God reaffirms to Jacob the promises made to Abraham:
And behold, the Lord stood above it and said, “I am the Lord, the God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac. The land on which you lie I will give to you and to your offspring. Your offspring shall be like the dust of the earth, and you shall spread abroad to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south, and in you and your offspring shall all the families of the earth be blessed. Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land. For I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” (Genesis 28:13–15)
God confirms the fact that His plan for Abraham will continue through Jacob, and He gives Jacob the same three promises He gave to Abraham. It is incredibly significant that God makes this promise to Jacob right after Jacob has tricked his brother, lied, and stolen his brother’s promise. He is emphasizing the same thing He emphasized to Abraham: Jacob’s righteousness is not what secures the promises. God’s righteousness is what secures the promises.
God promises Jacob that He will not leave him until He does what He has spoken to him. What has God spoken to him? The same three promises that He spoke to Abraham—righteous descendants, permanent inheritance in the land, and blessing to the nations.
When we survey Jacob’s life, we see that none of the promises were fulfilled in his lifetime. Jacob’s family struggled with issues. He ended his life being taken out of the land and down to Egypt rather than inheriting it. He did not see all the people of the earth blessed. Jacob ends up in the same predicament that Abraham faced: he did not see the fulfillment of the promises in his lifetime.
Does this mean God is a liar? We find the answer in the words of Jesus:
“And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” (Matthew 22:31–32)
When Jesus was asked about the reality of the resurrection, He affirmed He would raise Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob from the dead. In fact, God refers to Himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because death is not their final end. He will be their God forever, because the promise of the gospel is that they will live forever (John 6:40, 50–51). This gospel promise means God still intends to fulfill His promises to Abraham and Jacob. He will raise them from the dead, and they will see the fulfillment of the promise. This is what is implied in Genesis 15:7 when God tells Abraham that He brought him into the land so that he could inherit it. Abraham never inherited the land in his lifetime, but he will. He has to, for God to fulfill the promise. In light of Jesus’ promise and Hebrews 11, we can see the promise of the resurrection in this passage.
Hebrews 11 reiterates the fact that neither Abraham nor Jacob saw the fulfillment of God’s promises.
By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to a place that he was to receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going. By faith he went to live in the land of promise, as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise. For he was looking forward to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God. (Hebrews 11:8–10)
These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. (v. 13)
The author of Hebrews continues and explains God’s plan to us:
And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect. (11:39–40)
Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us. (Hebrews 12:1)
It has been suggested that ancient Israel may have experienced the fulfillment of Abraham’s promises in David’s reign, but the author of Hebrews is clear they remain unfulfilled. They are future promises that must be fulfilled literally and that require God to raise Abraham and Jacob from the dead to fulfill them.
The author of Hebrews also tells us a second thing that is very significant: Abraham’s promises will not be fulfilled without “us.” Who is “us”? “Us” refers to the believers in Jesus, both Jew and Gentile. The author is explaining that God has a multigenerational, multiethnic plan to fulfill the promises He made. The New Testament emphasizes that these three promises are deeply intertwined. We are all joined together in the mission of God to fulfill the promises made to Abraham. The Jewish people will not enter into their full inheritance until the Gentiles do; at the same time, the Gentiles cannot come into their fullness without the Jewish people coming into theirs.
INTERPRETING THE OLD TESTAMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF THE PROMISES
Once we recognize the centrality of the promises made to Abraham in the plan of God, it helps us to understand the main themes of the Old Testament. Abraham’s promises are a lens through which we can look at the Old Testament, and when we do that, we find these three promises drive the hopes of God and the predictions of the prophets.
Throughout the Old Testament, there is a constant prediction that the day will come when all of Israel is righteous (we could say saved)1, Israel inherits their land permanently in peace and safety2, and the Gentiles are worshipping the God of Israel.3 Throughout the Old Testament, we see the people’s deep longing for these promises and even their attempts to fulfill them in their own ability. We also read the impassioned oracles of the prophets who predict a day is coming when God will fulfill these great promises. These promises are repeated, developed, and reaffirmed throughout the Old Testament. They become one of the major unifying elements that binds together all the books of the Old Testament.