This edition first published 2020
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Paul Morrison, David M. Taylor and Phillip McGuire to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office
111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data
Names: Morrison, Paul, 1956– author. | Taylor, David M., 1963– author. | McGuire, Philip, author.
Title: The Maudsley guidelines on advanced prescribing in psychosis / Paul Morrison, David M. Taylor, Phillip McGuire.
Other titles: Guidelines on advanced prescribing in psychosis
Description: Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Blackwell, 2020. | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2019047707 (print) | LCCN 2019047708 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119578444 (paperback) | ISBN 9781119578529 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781119578437 (epub)
Subjects: MESH: Psychotic Disorders–drug therapy | Antipsychotic Agents–side effects | Evidence-Based Medicine | Physician-Patient Relations | Treatment Outcome
Classification: LCC RC483 (print) | LCC RC483 (ebook) | NLM WM 200 | DDC 616.89/18–dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019047707
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019047708
Cover Design: Wiley
3.1 General principles in the pharmacology of psychosis
3.2 Comparative receptor affinity of commonly prescribed antipsychotics
3.3 Antipsychotics for an acute psychotic episode
3.4 Adjunctive medication for an acute psychotic episode
3.5 Rapid tranquillisation
3.6 Clopixol acuphase (zuclopenthixol acetate)
3.7 Antipsychotics for the maintenance phase
3.8 Long‐acting depot preparations
3.9 Clozapine and neutrophil counts in the UK
4.1 Drug treatment of bipolar disorder
6.1 Thresholds for diabetes
6.2 Extra‐pyramidal side effects
8.1 Outcome rating scales
Appendix 1: Pharmacokinetics of selected psychotropics
Appendix 2: The metabolic syndrome
Appendix 3: Physical health monitoring for patients prescribed antipsychotics
Appendix 4: Physical health monitoring for patients prescribed mood stabilisers
Prescribing guidelines proceed on the basis that all individuals with a given diagnosis suffer from an identical illness, with common underlying mechanisms. In general medicine, this is taken for granted and is not even an issue. For the treatment of psychosis, things are not so straightforward. In contrast to general medical conditions, a one‐size‐fits‐all approach for the treatment of psychosis is unfeasible.
Psychosis can occur in various distinct psychiatric syndromes including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. Psychotic experiences can occur in normal health but can also be a marker of serious organic pathology, for example, antibodies directed toward specific ion channels in brain tissue. Throughout the text we emphasise that the treatment of psychosis must be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.
Although classification remains problematic in psychiatry, the same is not true of psychopharmacological treatments. Over a period of 20 years or so, beginning in the early 1950s, there emerged genuinely effective medicines for major psychiatric syndromes. For the first time it was possible to provide symptomatic improvement (and not just sedation) for mania, thought disorder, delusions, hallucinations, breakdown of ego boundaries and so forth. And it became apparent, within a few years, that maintenance treatment could prevent a relapse back into psychosis and keep people out of hospital.
A range of psychopharmacological options are available for patients, with important differences between the various drugs. We adopt the strategy of comparing the upside versus the downside of each pharmaceutical. The ideal scenario is where the prescriber and the patient can weigh up the benefits versus the costs of each option and make joint decisions on treatment.
We differentiate the acute from the maintenance stage, as regards the aims of pharmacological treatment. In the acute stage, symptom relief is the priority. In the maintenance stage, the aim is to avoid relapse, which aside from further suffering, predicts a poor functional outcome. Without medication, about 80–90% of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia will experience a relapse. With maintenance medication, the risk reduces to between 5% and 40%. Genuine collaboration is much more feasible in the maintenance compared to the acute stage, this being particularly notable in bipolar disorder.
There are sections on the common side effects of all widely used antipsychotic drugs, especially for clozapine, the most powerful antipsychotic. The aim is to have data close to hand for the prescriber, care coordinator, patients and their family. We incorporate a brief explanation of the molecular origin of each side effect to aid understanding and joint decision making. The ethos is that patients should be provided with accurate data to be able to make informed healthcare decisions for themselves.
In the final two sections, the emphasis shifts from the individual toward the population level and the systems in which treatment takes place. The task is to configure resources for optimum benefit at minimal cost. We introduce the principles of value‐based healthcare and highlight the emergence of engineering principles in healthcare delivery systems. Both developments hold the promise of bringing the management of healthcare delivery under the scientific gaze.
When selecting a drug, it is useful to have basic, accurate data close to hand, covering the pharmacokinetics, interactions and the requisite physical health checks for each drug. We hope that psychiatrists, pharmacists and nurse prescribers will find the tables at the end of the book helpful for this purpose, even in a busy clinical setting.
We thank the following people for their contribution and expertise: Barbara Arroyo, Edward Chesney, Arsime Demjaha, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Fiona Gaughran, Guy Goodwin, Robert Harland, Eleanor Hinds, Juliet Hurn, Sameer Jauhar, Luke Jelen, Anne Kjerrström, John Lally, James MaCabe, Rachael McGuinness, Robert Miller, Sridhar Natesan, Toby Pillinger, Ros Ramsay, Ashvini Ramoutar, Tim Segal, Matthew Taylor and Allan Young.
“Paul Morrison has received funding from GW pharmaceuticals in the form of unrestricted grants, speaker’s fees from Otsuka, Pfizer and Valeant and consultancy fees from GW pharmaceuticals, Oxford PharmGenesis and Boehringer Ingelheim”.
“David M. Taylor has received research funding and lecturing honoraria from Janssen, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Sunovion and Galen”
Philip McGuire has received research grant funding from GW Pharmaceuticals.
Psychiatry has always struggled with terms and definitions. Canvass the opinions of a modern community multidisciplinary team, and there are likely to be a range of opinions on what psychosis actually is [1]. Yet very few will object to the phenomenological perspective, which captures the seriousness of just what is at stake in psychosis. That is because psychosis impacts upon the highest and most personal faculties of the human mind.
In short, psychosis describes a disturbance of perception, thinking, beliefs, or selfhood in which the patient experiences a fundamental transformation in their experience of lived reality. This transformation can be terrifying as in paranoid psychoses or thrilling as in mania. Psychosis can emerge and dissipate quickly or become ingrained in the mind/brain over many months. Some patients seek safety by withdrawing from the world, whereas others attract attention to their mental state through excited, agitated, bizarre, or catatonic behaviour.
The most common feature of psychosis is not hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, paranoia or suspiciousness as is commonly believed but lack of insight [2]. Lack of insight denotes the blind‐spot a patient has in regard to the falseness of their new reality and the abnormal nature of their mental state [3]. For some the term ‘lack of insight’ exemplifies the power imbalance within psychiatry.
Regardless of terminology, the blind‐spot is what makes the care of many patients suffering psychosis particularly challenging. Why would anyone take treatment, let alone engage with mental health professionals if they think their experiences are real rather than a manifestation of psychiatric illness.
Mental states have material correlates. For some patients, a material dysfunction is the direct cause of their psychosis. The list of causes includes endocrine disorders (e.g. thyroid disease), metabolic disorders (e.g. porphyria), auto‐immune conditions (e.g. N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate, NMDA‐receptor encephalitis), infections (e.g. herpes‐simplex encephalitis), epilepsy (e.g. temporal lobe epilepsy), nutritional deficits (e.g. vitamin B12 deficiency), basal ganglia disorders (e.g. Wilson's disease), medications (e.g. acyclovir), dementias (e.g. Alzheimer's disease), and most common of all, psychoactive drugs, as causes [4].
Psychosis can occur in the following syndromes: schizophrenia, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, post‐partum psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Psychotic experiences can also manifest in severe obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). There are also brief, acute, full‐blown psychotic episodes occurring outwith any of these syndromes, which even in the era before antipsychotic drugs, tended to show a full recovery of insight and restoration of the former reality [7, 8].
Auditory pseudo‐hallucinations and ‘paranoia’ can occur in people prone to emotional instability, but insight is maintained, and the prominence of deliberate self‐harm in the context of early abuse steers the formulation away from a psychotic disorder [9–11]. Indeed, psychotic‐like phenomena including voices and paranoia occur in the general population, but such experiences do not overwhelm the self to the extent that there is a fundamental transformation of lived reality, and should not be over‐psychologised as markers of mental illness [12–14].
Precise diagnosis might not be possible, but in some cases it is vital. For instance, psychosis arising from antibodies targeting the NMDA‐receptor requires urgent immunological treatment [16]. In such cases antipsychotics and psychological therapy are of no value and lead to delays.
Given the multitude of causes of psychosis, patients require a skilled assessment and careful biopsychosocial formulation before treatment, whether pharmacological or psychological, is embarked upon [17].
Psychosis and schizophrenia are not synonymous. Only about one in eight patients who experience an acute psychosis will go on to develop schizophrenia over a period of three to five years [18].
Schizophrenia is not a single syndrome [19]. From the outset, the term subsumed a collection of phenotypes [20–22].
The precise definition and demarcation of schizophrenia is as uncertain as ever, and some authorities have suggested dropping the term altogether because of the associated stigma [23, 24].
On the other hand, there are a proportion of patients who exhibit such marked social decline and loss of personality for whom no alternative descriptor is forthcoming.
Bipolar disorder is a lifelong, episodic illness with high heritability [33] Bipolar I is defined by mania. In mania, there is an absence of insight, the cardinal feature of psychosis [33].
Bipolar patients typically recover insight between manic episodes, in that they can take a rationale perspective on their previous mental state and judge correctly that their experience of lived‐reality at the time of crisis was pathological [34, 35].
Bipolar I is diagnosed after one episode of mania. Mania is characterised by a discrete period of at least one week of: persistently elevated or irritable mood; increased self‐esteem or grandiosity; decreased need for sleep; more talkativeness than usual or pressure to keep talking; flight of ideas or subjective experience of racing thoughts; distractibility; increased goal‐directed activity, or excessive involvement in pleasurable activities with high potential for painful results.
In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5), the presence of increased activity is a requirement for mania/hypomania. Increased activity can differentiate mania/hypomania from other illnesses [37].
Clinicians who treat psychosis will be familiar with the range of patients who present with problems arising from cannabis use [38]. At least one‐quarter of all new cases of psychotic illness in South London are attributable to high‐potency ‘skunk’ cannabis [39].
Compared to traditional cannabis, skunk is high in the pro‐psychotic molecule THC, but contains negligible amounts of another molecule called cannabidiol (CBD). The balance is important as CBD inhibits the psychotic effect of THC [40]. CBD also appears to have therapeutic effects in schizophrenia [41].
4344
THC, is a partial agonist at the CB1 receptor. The synthetic cannabinoids (‘spice’) are full agonists at the CB1 receptor and have much stronger effects on the psyche, eliciting intense, florid psychoses [45]. Synthetic cannabinoids can also have a pronounced effect on heart rate and blood pressure.
Around one in seven cannabis users in the population meet criteria for dependence. High‐potency cannabinoid preparations appear to have more propensity for addiction. There is a cannabis withdrawal syndrome, which resembles nicotine withdrawal. Cravings and psychomotor agitation peak at days 3–4 and diminish over 14 days [48].
In many US states and in Canada, cannabis has been legalised for recreational or medical use. Products that are high in THC with negligible CBD concentrations can be readily purchased. There are worries that cannabis‐related psychiatric problems could increase in North America with the change in legislation [49].