Cover: The Maudsley Guidelines on Advanced Prescribing in Psychosis by Paul Morrison, David Taylor and Phillip McGuire

The Maudsley Guidelines on Advanced Prescribing in Psychosis

Paul Morrison

Argyll and Bute Hospital
Scotland, UK
and
Institute of Psychiatry
Psychology and Neuroscience
King’s College London
London, UK

David M. Taylor

Maudsley Hospital
and
King’s College London
London, UK

Phillip McGuire

Institute of Psychiatry
Psychology and Neuroscience
King’s College London
London, UK

 

 

logo.gif

List of tables

3.1 General principles in the pharmacology of psychosis

3.2 Comparative receptor affinity of commonly prescribed antipsychotics

3.3 Antipsychotics for an acute psychotic episode

3.4 Adjunctive medication for an acute psychotic episode

3.5 Rapid tranquillisation

3.6 Clopixol acuphase (zuclopenthixol acetate)

3.7 Antipsychotics for the maintenance phase

3.8 Long‐acting depot preparations

3.9 Clozapine and neutrophil counts in the UK

4.1 Drug treatment of bipolar disorder

6.1 Thresholds for diabetes

6.2 Extra‐pyramidal side effects

8.1 Outcome rating scales

Appendix 1: Pharmacokinetics of selected psychotropics

Appendix 2: The metabolic syndrome

Appendix 3: Physical health monitoring for patients prescribed antipsychotics

Appendix 4: Physical health monitoring for patients prescribed mood stabilisers

Preface

Prescribing guidelines proceed on the basis that all individuals with a given diagnosis suffer from an identical illness, with common underlying mechanisms. In general medicine, this is taken for granted and is not even an issue. For the treatment of psychosis, things are not so straightforward. In contrast to general medical conditions, a one‐size‐fits‐all approach for the treatment of psychosis is unfeasible.

Psychosis can occur in various distinct psychiatric syndromes including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. Psychotic experiences can occur in normal health but can also be a marker of serious organic pathology, for example, antibodies directed toward specific ion channels in brain tissue. Throughout the text we emphasise that the treatment of psychosis must be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

Although classification remains problematic in psychiatry, the same is not true of psychopharmacological treatments. Over a period of 20 years or so, beginning in the early 1950s, there emerged genuinely effective medicines for major psychiatric syndromes. For the first time it was possible to provide symptomatic improvement (and not just sedation) for mania, thought disorder, delusions, hallucinations, breakdown of ego boundaries and so forth. And it became apparent, within a few years, that maintenance treatment could prevent a relapse back into psychosis and keep people out of hospital.

A range of psychopharmacological options are available for patients, with important differences between the various drugs. We adopt the strategy of comparing the upside versus the downside of each pharmaceutical. The ideal scenario is where the prescriber and the patient can weigh up the benefits versus the costs of each option and make joint decisions on treatment.

We differentiate the acute from the maintenance stage, as regards the aims of pharmacological treatment. In the acute stage, symptom relief is the priority. In the maintenance stage, the aim is to avoid relapse, which aside from further suffering, predicts a poor functional outcome. Without medication, about 80–90% of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia will experience a relapse. With maintenance medication, the risk reduces to between 5% and 40%. Genuine collaboration is much more feasible in the maintenance compared to the acute stage, this being particularly notable in bipolar disorder.

There are sections on the common side effects of all widely used antipsychotic drugs, especially for clozapine, the most powerful antipsychotic. The aim is to have data close to hand for the prescriber, care coordinator, patients and their family. We incorporate a brief explanation of the molecular origin of each side effect to aid understanding and joint decision making. The ethos is that patients should be provided with accurate data to be able to make informed healthcare decisions for themselves.

In the final two sections, the emphasis shifts from the individual toward the population level and the systems in which treatment takes place. The task is to configure resources for optimum benefit at minimal cost. We introduce the principles of value‐based healthcare and highlight the emergence of engineering principles in healthcare delivery systems. Both developments hold the promise of bringing the management of healthcare delivery under the scientific gaze.

When selecting a drug, it is useful to have basic, accurate data close to hand, covering the pharmacokinetics, interactions and the requisite physical health checks for each drug. We hope that psychiatrists, pharmacists and nurse prescribers will find the tables at the end of the book helpful for this purpose, even in a busy clinical setting.

Glossary

AKT
RAC‐alpha serine/threonine‐protein kinase
BLIP
Brief limited intermittent psychosis
CGI
Clinical global impression
CMHT
Community mental health team
CNS
Central nervous system
CBD
Cannabidiol
CBT
Cognitive behavioural therapy
CRT
Cognitive remediation therapy
DKA
Diabetic ketoacidosis
ECT
Electroconvulsive therapy
EI
Early intervention
EPSEs
Extrapyramidal side‐effects
GABA
&ip.gamma;‐aminobutyric acid
GAF
Global assessment of functioning
GLP‐1
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1
GSK3β
Glycogen synthase kinase 3β
hERG
Human‐ether‐a‐go‐go‐related gene
HDAC
Histone deacetylase
HTT
Home treatment team
ICD10
International statistical classification of diseases 10th Edition
IM
Intramuscular
LSD
Lysergic acid diethylamide
NMDA
N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate
NICE
National institute of Clinical Excellence
OCD
Obsessive compulsive disorder
RCT
Randomised controlled trial
SLAM
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
SSRI
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
TD
Tardive dyskinesia
THC
delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol
UDS
Urine drug screen

Acknowledgments

We thank the following people for their contribution and expertise: Barbara Arroyo, Edward Chesney, Arsime Demjaha, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Fiona Gaughran, Guy Goodwin, Robert Harland, Eleanor Hinds, Juliet Hurn, Sameer Jauhar, Luke Jelen, Anne Kjerrström, John Lally, James MaCabe, Rachael McGuinness, Robert Miller, Sridhar Natesan, Toby Pillinger, Ros Ramsay, Ashvini Ramoutar, Tim Segal, Matthew Taylor and Allan Young.

COI statements

“Paul Morrison has received funding from GW pharmaceuticals in the form of unrestricted grants, speaker’s fees from Otsuka, Pfizer and Valeant and consultancy fees from GW pharmaceuticals, Oxford PharmGenesis and Boehringer Ingelheim”.

“David M. Taylor has received research funding and lecturing honoraria from Janssen, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Sunovion and Galen”

Philip McGuire has received research grant funding from GW Pharmaceuticals.

Chapter 1
Psychosis

1.1 What is psychosis?

Psychiatry has always struggled with terms and definitions. Canvass the opinions of a modern community multidisciplinary team, and there are likely to be a range of opinions on what psychosis actually is [1]. Yet very few will object to the phenomenological perspective, which captures the seriousness of just what is at stake in psychosis. That is because psychosis impacts upon the highest and most personal faculties of the human mind.

In short, psychosis describes a disturbance of perception, thinking, beliefs, or selfhood in which the patient experiences a fundamental transformation in their experience of lived reality. This transformation can be terrifying as in paranoid psychoses or thrilling as in mania. Psychosis can emerge and dissipate quickly or become ingrained in the mind/brain over many months. Some patients seek safety by withdrawing from the world, whereas others attract attention to their mental state through excited, agitated, bizarre, or catatonic behaviour.

1.2 Lack of insight

The most common feature of psychosis is not hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, paranoia or suspiciousness as is commonly believed but lack of insight [2]. Lack of insight denotes the blind‐spot a patient has in regard to the falseness of their new reality and the abnormal nature of their mental state [3]. For some the term ‘lack of insight’ exemplifies the power imbalance within psychiatry.

Regardless of terminology, the blind‐spot is what makes the care of many patients suffering psychosis particularly challenging. Why would anyone take treatment, let alone engage with mental health professionals if they think their experiences are real rather than a manifestation of psychiatric illness.

1.3 Causes of psychosis

Mental states have material correlates. For some patients, a material dysfunction is the direct cause of their psychosis. The list of causes includes endocrine disorders (e.g. thyroid disease), metabolic disorders (e.g. porphyria), auto‐immune conditions (e.g. N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate, NMDA‐receptor encephalitis), infections (e.g. herpes‐simplex encephalitis), epilepsy (e.g. temporal lobe epilepsy), nutritional deficits (e.g. vitamin B12 deficiency), basal ganglia disorders (e.g. Wilson's disease), medications (e.g. acyclovir), dementias (e.g. Alzheimer's disease), and most common of all, psychoactive drugs, as causes [4].

  • The following psychoactive drugs can elicit an acute psychotic episode after a single administration: serotonin 5HT2A receptor agonists (e.g. lysergic acid diethylamide, LSD), glutamate NMDA channel blockers (e.g. ketamine), and cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists (e.g. delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol, THC) [5].
  • Repeated, heavy use of stimulants can elicit a classic paranoid psychosis by impacting upon dopamine signalling (e.g. methamphetamine) [5, 6].

Psychosis can occur in the following syndromes: schizophrenia, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, post‐partum psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Psychotic experiences can also manifest in severe obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). There are also brief, acute, full‐blown psychotic episodes occurring outwith any of these syndromes, which even in the era before antipsychotic drugs, tended to show a full recovery of insight and restoration of the former reality [7, 8].

Auditory pseudo‐hallucinations and ‘paranoia’ can occur in people prone to emotional instability, but insight is maintained, and the prominence of deliberate self‐harm in the context of early abuse steers the formulation away from a psychotic disorder [9–11]. Indeed, psychotic‐like phenomena including voices and paranoia occur in the general population, but such experiences do not overwhelm the self to the extent that there is a fundamental transformation of lived reality, and should not be over‐psychologised as markers of mental illness [12–14].

  • Robin Murray and Jim van Os have made the elegant observation that, ‘the boundaries between normal mentation, common mental disorder and schizophrenia become blurred, if positive psychotic symptoms are used as a distinguisher’ [15].

Precise diagnosis might not be possible, but in some cases it is vital. For instance, psychosis arising from antibodies targeting the NMDA‐receptor requires urgent immunological treatment [16]. In such cases antipsychotics and psychological therapy are of no value and lead to delays.

Given the multitude of causes of psychosis, patients require a skilled assessment and careful biopsychosocial formulation before treatment, whether pharmacological or psychological, is embarked upon [17].

1.4 Schizophrenia: loss of personality and psychosocial decline

Psychosis and schizophrenia are not synonymous. Only about one in eight patients who experience an acute psychosis will go on to develop schizophrenia over a period of three to five years [18].

Schizophrenia is not a single syndrome [19]. From the outset, the term subsumed a collection of phenotypes [20–22].

  • Paranoid form, dominated by psychotic symptoms.
  • Hebephrenic form, dominated by severe thought disorder and bizarre affect.
  • Catatonic form, dominated by psychomotor signs.
  • Simple form, dominated by severe psychosocial decline but no psychotic symptoms.

The precise definition and demarcation of schizophrenia is as uncertain as ever, and some authorities have suggested dropping the term altogether because of the associated stigma [23, 24].

On the other hand, there are a proportion of patients who exhibit such marked social decline and loss of personality for whom no alternative descriptor is forthcoming.

  • Many consider that psychosocial decline and loss of personality are the hallmarks of schizophrenia [25]. Essentially the same meaning is conveyed by the term, negative symptoms, originally formulated in nineteenth‐century neurology to describe the loss of a function which is normally present in health. In schizophrenia the loss encompasses; drive, motivation, ambition, emotion, conversation, interests, family life, friendships, romantic relationships, and intellectual life [26–28].
  • A proportion of patients present with negative symptoms from the outset. Indeed, the drift towards psychosocial withdrawal and personality decline can precede a psychotic episode by several years [25].
  • Negative symptoms carry much more prognostic and diagnostic weight than the positive symptoms. Negative symptoms are commensurate with poorer long‐term outcomes [29].
  • Schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms are amongst the most psychosocially disabled, but sometimes the absence of risk alerts means that they can often be overlooked [30, 31]. Indeed, the absence or relative paucity of ‘voices’ and ‘paranoia’ in the overall clinical picture can even lead inexperienced workers to judge that there is no evidence of a mental disorder.
    • A relatively common error is the misdiagnosis of an autistic disorder. The negative syndrome of schizophrenia and autistic disorders are characterised by impaired social interaction. A key distinguishing feature is that autism is manifest before the age of three years, whereas a schizophrenic decline emerges in adolescence/early adulthood.
  • One concern, which has arisen, is that there may be a tendency towards under‐recognition and under‐treatment of severe and enduring mental illness, such as negative syndrome schizophrenia, and over‐responding to relatively mild psychological problems [32].

1.5 Bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a lifelong, episodic illness with high heritability [33] Bipolar I is defined by mania. In mania, there is an absence of insight, the cardinal feature of psychosis [33].

Bipolar patients typically recover insight between manic episodes, in that they can take a rationale perspective on their previous mental state and judge correctly that their experience of lived‐reality at the time of crisis was pathological [34, 35].

Bipolar I is diagnosed after one episode of mania. Mania is characterised by a discrete period of at least one week of: persistently elevated or irritable mood; increased self‐esteem or grandiosity; decreased need for sleep; more talkativeness than usual or pressure to keep talking; flight of ideas or subjective experience of racing thoughts; distractibility; increased goal‐directed activity, or excessive involvement in pleasurable activities with high potential for painful results.

  • Bipolar II is diagnosed after one episode of hypomania + one episode of depression. Hypomania (‘mini‐mania’) is recognised as mania which is not severe enough to cause a marked impairment in psychosocial functioning, psychosis, or to require hospitalisation. Periods of hypomania lasting one to four days are more common than prolonged episodes [36].

In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5), the presence of increased activity is a requirement for mania/hypomania. Increased activity can differentiate mania/hypomania from other illnesses [37].

1.6 Cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids, and psychosis

Clinicians who treat psychosis will be familiar with the range of patients who present with problems arising from cannabis use [38]. At least one‐quarter of all new cases of psychotic illness in South London are attributable to high‐potency ‘skunk’ cannabis [39].

Compared to traditional cannabis, skunk is high in the pro‐psychotic molecule THC, but contains negligible amounts of another molecule called cannabidiol (CBD). The balance is important as CBD inhibits the psychotic effect of THC [40]. CBD also appears to have therapeutic effects in schizophrenia [41].

  • Acute cannabinoid psychoses are typically paranoid or manic in flavour. Less commonly, there can be hebephrenic features or motor signs such as posturing and bizarre gestures [42].

4344

THC, is a partial agonist at the CB1 receptor. The synthetic cannabinoids (‘spice’) are full agonists at the CB1 receptor and have much stronger effects on the psyche, eliciting intense, florid psychoses [45]. Synthetic cannabinoids can also have a pronounced effect on heart rate and blood pressure.

  • An emerging concern is that the synthetic cannabinoids may be so powerful as to overwhelm the stabilising properties of antipsychotic medication.
  • The synthetic cannabinoids are not detected in standard drug screens, and over 150 molecules are available. Markers of synthetic cannabinoids use include confusion, slurred speech, excessive sweating, tachycardia and hypertension [46].
  • Complications of synthetic cannabis use include renal failure, pulmonary damage, myocardial infarction, seizures, and stroke [46].
  • Synthetic cannabinoids have emerged as a major problem in UK prisons [47].

Around one in seven cannabis users in the population meet criteria for dependence. High‐potency cannabinoid preparations appear to have more propensity for addiction. There is a cannabis withdrawal syndrome, which resembles nicotine withdrawal. Cravings and psychomotor agitation peak at days 3–4 and diminish over 14 days [48].

  • Many patients who are able to sustain abstinence can make a significant recovery. The challenge, of course, is in persuading patients that the downside of their drug use far outweighs any residual upside.

In many US states and in Canada, cannabis has been legalised for recreational or medical use. Products that are high in THC with negligible CBD concentrations can be readily purchased. There are worries that cannabis‐related psychiatric problems could increase in North America with the change in legislation [49].